Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Full-Race Twinscroll 35R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #256  
streetturbo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Originally Posted by scorke
It appears this guy is all jokes....




He got 25 psi at 4000 rpm on his 35R too, isn't that incredible?

I hate when people make stuff up.

Scorke
Lol, he got bi-turbo setup
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #257  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by scorke
It appears this guy is all jokes....




He got 25 psi at 4000 rpm on his 35R too, isn't that incredible?

I hate when people make stuff up.

Scorke
This was my old setup, and sorry for your misinformation. I am not all jokes by any means, ask anyone that knows me personally. Yes I did have full boost with my 35R at 4,000 but it was too laggy down low so I got rid of that setup and went with this Borg Warner setup and smaller cams. I have many vendors and good friends that are vendors on here that can verify this information.

The smaller turbo has much more low end and makes more power from 2-4k than the 35r does. I auto-cross the car so this was important to me. I loved the 35r and it did alright at the auto-cross just not as good as this turbo.

Back on topic....

All I am trying to say is the GT series spool is not impressive, I would love to try this manifold with another turbo! This manifold will help spool I will agree and will definitely say it is a very nice piece. Just would like to see some tests with another turbo is all.

~Zach
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #258  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by phenem
The smaller turbo has much more low end and makes more power from 2-4k than the 35r does. I auto-cross the car so this was important to me. I loved the 35r and it did alright at the auto-cross just not as good as this turbo.

Back on topic....

All I am trying to say is the GT series spool is not impressive, I would love to try this manifold with another turbo! This manifold will help spool I will agree and will definitely say it is a very nice piece. Just would like to see some tests with another turbo is all.

~Zach
Garrett is the LEADER in automotive turbo applications. What is propietary on the s256 that gives it an inherent advantage over a Garrett turbo?

How did you get your 35R to make the same boost at the same RPM? Either your 35R was a freak or you have a laggy s256? does it not seem almost impossible for what you stated to be true?

The rev-hard is probably the most comprimised manifold besides the stock one. The things it has going for it are cost, cast, and possibly quick spool due to the volume.

Scorke
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 10:14 AM
  #259  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by scorke
Garrett is the LEADER in automotive turbo applications. What is propietary on the s256 that gives it an inherent advantage over a Garrett turbo?

How did you get your 35R to make the same boost at the same RPM? Either your 35R was a freak or you have a laggy s256? does it not seem almost impossible for what you stated to be true?

The rev-hard is probably the most comprimised manifold besides the stock one. The things it has going for it are cost, cast, and possibly quick spool due to the volume.

Scorke
I am not arguing that they are not the leader, just saying that I would like to see some test's with other turbo's is all. I do not want to get in a GT series pissing match that Garrett is awesome. They make nice turbo's and so do other companies....I love Garrett stuff just was not impressed with the 30r or 35r on my car as far as low end goes. They compromise too much down low to gain power up top.

I had HKS 264's with gt35r spooled up very fast and with my 2.3 it helped it even more. (adding the 30r only gained like 200 rpm in spool up with less gains up top)

I agree Rev-hard manifold is the most compromised manifold but it is perfect for my application.

Back on topic...

I would LOVE to see this manifold with another turbo! I am thinking of going to a tubular manifold soon and want to see what this would do on some other turbos.

~Zach
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:13 AM
  #260  
Max Power's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
If what you're using is flanged for a t3 or t4 and has a twin volute entry hotside, it should work (assuming it is geometrically sized similarly to the GT turbos so you don't run into clearance issues with the downpipe).

As for making 25psi by 4k on the Gt35, do you have datalogs of this or is it looking at a boost gauge? With the BW turbo, you are running 26 psi on 93 with no Meth/H20 and making 360 whp? Does this dyno have a similar run with a gt30 turbo on pump gas with roughly the same boost?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #261  
jbrown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by Max Power
If what you're using is flanged for a t3 or t4 and has a twin volute entry hotside, it should work (assuming it is geometrically sized similarly to the GT turbos so you don't run into clearance issues with the downpipe).

As for making 25psi by 4k on the Gt35, do you have datalogs of this or is it looking at a boost gauge? With the BW turbo, you are running 26 psi on 93 with no Meth/H20 and making 360 whp? Does this dyno have a similar run with a gt30 turbo on pump gas with roughly the same boost?
How about moving this discussion to another thread? I am here to read about the Full-Race Twinscroll 35R and / or 30R. Not the only BW S256 that doesn't suck.

kthx.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:24 AM
  #262  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by Max Power
If what you're using is flanged for a t3 or t4 and has a twin volute entry hotside, it should work (assuming it is geometrically sized similarly to the GT turbos so you don't run into clearance issues with the downpipe).

As for making 25psi by 4k on the Gt35, do you have datalogs of this or is it looking at a boost gauge? With the BW turbo, you are running 26 psi on 93 with no Meth/H20 and making 360 whp? Does this dyno have a similar run with a gt30 turbo on pump gas with roughly the same boost?
I do have datalogs and all with the 35r and can prove this, I am on my work computer and will post up logs later tonight, however I am going to start a new thread as this is referencing something off topic.

Remember I have a built motor and they will take a lot more boost without having to add meth or H20 to prohibit knock conditions. I actually ran a max of 30psi that day at the dyno but did not see any benefit running it as my HKS EVC ATM only runs 29psi and kept on boost cutting to stop from hitting the limit.

I will have to ask Chad to see if he can chime in here and back me up on what I am saying. He probably has a 30r chart on the dyno somewhere. This dyno is a heartbreaker and is very similar to BR's dyno but reads a hair lower than his! So making 360tq on this dyno is no joke! He is a stand up guy and I am sure you guys have seen pictures of his place....amazing.

~Zach
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #263  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by phenem
I do have datalogs and all with the 35r and can prove this, I am on my work computer and will post up logs later tonight, however I am going to start a new thread as this is referencing something off topic.

Remember I have a built motor and they will take a lot more boost without having to add meth or H20 to prohibit knock conditions. I actually ran a max of 30psi that day at the dyno but did not see any benefit running it as my HKS EVC ATM only runs 29psi and kept on boost cutting to stop from hitting the limit.

I will have to ask Chad to see if he can chime in here and back me up on what I am saying. He probably has a 30r chart on the dyno somewhere. This dyno is a heartbreaker and is very similar to BR's dyno but reads a hair lower than his! So making 360tq on this dyno is no joke! He is a stand up guy and I am sure you guys have seen pictures of his place....amazing.

~Zach
Running a built motor should have slim to no effect on the knock threshold unless there is a radically different piston top or a drop in compression.

Scorke
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #264  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by scorke
Running a built motor should have slim to no effect on the knock threshold unless there is a radically different piston top or a drop in compression.

Scorke
The knock threshold increases dramatically when using Weisco pistons then! Just my experience with my car that's all. I have tuned a good number of EVO's around my area and when I tune a stock motor it starts to knock around 22-23psi with no meth/h2o. I was in Chad's shop and he could not believe when we turned up the boost it wasn't knocking and was still on pump gas. No arguing just stating the facts as I have experienced them safely and under a controlled environment.

~Zach
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #265  
phenem's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 811
Likes: 4
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by jbrown
How about moving this discussion to another thread? I am here to read about the Full-Race Twinscroll 35R and / or 30R. Not the only BW S256 that doesn't suck.

kthx.
I will start a new thread tonight with all the logs and dyno sheets for everyone and I agree that this thread is for the full-race twinscroll manifold setup....

~Zach
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #266  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by BillAce
My power mods are:
Revolvers, head studs, AEM Tru Boost, FR vertical IC, Buschur 3" exh, UICP, 3" air intake, 1000cc injectors, CBR COP setup, exedy HD Twin Disk.

I removed a Buschur Deluxe FMIC, downpipe, FR Prostock mani, 10.5 hotside w/ O2 housing. With that setup I was happy and didn't plan to change anything else because I wasn't willing to accept the negatives for more HP.

Now, the throttle response is much better and power comes on and builds very linearly. It is smoother and much more enjoyable to drive. The sudden drop in speed after lifting off the throttle is decreased. There is noticeably less engine braking. The new setup feels better down low and is much better up top. From a guy that didn't want to change the stock turbo, this was definitely the way to go.
Originally Posted by BillAce
The previous dyno was with a stock turbo + 10.5 hotside and O2 housing. That made a best of 338 with the same cam gear settings, both on 93 pump @ 22psi.

Ivey told me he couldn't believe the spool and I have to agree. The throttle response is amazing and the car just comes alive on part throttle. We didn't do a race gas pull because I haven't decided if I would use C16 or meth and didn't want to waste Sean's time.

So far the benefits are:
The car feels so responsive, a dyno just can't tell the story
much more midrange pull
a ton more top end, even on pump
The car sounds sick at idle, every stop light gets people looking.
It feels really different on decel, the engine braking is less than half of what it was with the stock turbo. (Geoff should include brake pads)
Makes much better use of the 5 speed gearing
Great DD or street car setup.
glad to hear you are happy with the car bill. im eager to get your impressions once you get it on a road course and drag strip. As it is, your daily commute is probably much more fun .. i love the twinscroll sound too


Originally Posted by NEUROEVO
thanks for the 30R dyno plot. any way we could see the non twinscroll dyno plot for comparison? Is this the 3071 or 3076? what was your max boost? can't wait to see the rest of you testing on the bigger turbos with the necessary supporting mods to make the most of these turbos!
there are tons of singlescroll 30R plots on this forum, there are a few posted in this thread even. A number of Full-Race singlescroll 30R customers have posted their dynos on this forum if you want to dig through the search

as people make their engines breathe better and better, our turbo kits will make more and more power

Originally Posted by CleverUserName
happen to have a MIVEC equipped motor you plan on testing? holy cow, i just noticed that graph has the stock TB on it. to clarify, that had the stock cat on it as well?
we will be doing our 40R testing on a mivec evo 9. The car did have stock intake mani and TB, but definately no cat

Originally Posted by mchuang
I understand that this is your twinscroll kit Geoff, but the twinscroll turbo is not the only thing contributing to the spool here right? I would figure the back door piping which decreased overall lengths in charge pipes have quite a bit to do with it as well or maybe im wrong
It all works as a system. Its a combination of the twinscroll manifold, the smooth flowing downpipe, the ultra short charge pipes with vertical flow core, good tuning and a solid setup. Its not just one piece, its all of them working together as a system.

Originally Posted by Smogrunner
If this was a typical third gear pull on a dynojet with 94 degree temps, the spool-up is DEFINITELY, WAY faster than average.... Also, if the stock intercooler was used, it would enhance initial spool up but hinder peak numbers. The peak numbers here on 93 octane are not very impressive, but from the look of the graph, the tune is conservative and smooth.
it spools much faster than every FR single scroll 30R evo dyno i have saved on my computer, and subsequently has a broader powerband

Originally Posted by Smogrunner
First, this graph looks really conservative to me. Usually, with zero smoothing, you'd see a rougher graph on pump gas if it was tuned aggressively. I think there is more left on the table. This kit would crush-destroy-humiliate a stock turboed 9. On race gas, this kit would make 500+whp, that is a hundred more than a 9 on race gas.
sean ivey tuned the car very conservative, this is his daily driver street car/weekend race car. its gotta be able to get to work on monday! (rain and winter in NJ arent fun to be on a streetbike)

Originally Posted by BillAce
This was 3rd gear and is the safe tune I requested. This was the final pull before the car came off the dyno. Sean did a considerable amount of road tuning too. I noticed the same thing with the smoothing setting and knew that Sean really did tune for reliability. I don't see a reason to tune for numbers with C16 since I don't ever plan to use it. The car does feel great and meth is now really on my mind...E85 would be if I could get it reliably. I have the FR vertical flow IC, pretty much their entire kit.

Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Show me one 30R dynojet dyno graph that shows more power at 4000rpm. I have the best ever recorded (to my knowledge) right here in my laptop that I can post up for comparison with almost the exact same mods as the dyno posted above.
i agree, i havent seen any 30R evo making 200whp/200wtq earlier either...

Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Looks to me that the Full Race Kit makes 20more whp/20 more wtq at 4000rpms than the best traditional turbo kit I've ever recorded in 34 degree hotter weather. There are many other variable out there, but this turbo definitely makes great low end power. No doubt whatsoever about that. Next big question for most of us: Let's see if this kit keeps up with the big boys at 30 to 33 psi. Will it make 500+ whp without issue like the Tuning Tech kit, the AMS kit, the Buschur kit, etc.
there are some variables to consider, but if you have them taken care of, absolutely it will make the power. all our other kits have put the power down, we arent about to change that (even buschur runs our single scroll manifold on his personal car)

Originally Posted by Smogrunner
I don't think so on this one. That kind of early spool advantage in 34 degree hotter temps can't be summed up to differences in dynos. ... the Full Race kit seems to be making around 50more whp and 50 more torque at 4000rpms
if you still need proof it was done in third, ask sean!

Originally Posted by Ted B
Someone ask Sean Ivey of his impressions in driving the car. The dyno only shows one aspect.
Originally Posted by Sean@Iveytune
My impression is the spool on the car feels very very fast. It's not extreme HP but man it spools fast on the street. That was my first impression driving it. Sean
thanks for the post sean


Originally Posted by phenem
Honestly guys this does not impress me at all! I have a Borg Warner S256 T3 flanged turbo. I got rid of my GT series turbo to go with this setup because of the spool time of the GT series turbos was not impressive.
wow, youre a tough guy to impress. no doubt borg warner has some cool stuff on the horizon, but its pretty tough to outperform a twinscroll 30R...

Originally Posted by phenem
I will start a new thread tonight with all the logs and dyno sheets for everyone and I agree that this thread is for the full-race twinscroll manifold setup....
thank you for not cluttering this thread anymore


Originally Posted by Ted B
can you give a brief configuration sketch of the 600hp S14 you mention in your signature?
haha there are a lot of S14s around full-race... the 750whp one is my r14 (awd, stock bottom end RB26 with a 42R @ 24 psi). the 600whp one actually did that on our T3/T67 HO DBB .63 a/r (aka gt37R), but we have since switched that car out to a twinscroll 30R. while it only makes 460whp, it is so much more fun to drive compared to the 37R, and i never drag race the car anyway. The throttle reponse lets you flick the car anywhere you want it, get it sideways, keep it straight, whatever... since it is driven on the street alot, its just the most fun all around setup ive ever had on the car. engine setup is a 100% stock bottom end with a greddy oil pan. 100% stock head ports, just some tomei 264s, ferrea springs/retainers and rocker arm stoppers

Last edited by Geoff Raicer; Sep 7, 2007 at 05:33 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:37 PM
  #267  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by scorke
Running a built motor should have slim to no effect on the knock threshold unless there is a radically different piston top or a drop in compression.

Scorke
head work can help with knock suppression...

we are seeing the affects on our car... 30psi on 93 on our 35R with gt67 comp wheel, 499whp on pump 411wtq....

Phenems car spooled EXCEPTIONALLY well on our dyno... and he has ALOT less headwork than we do...

im curious about the TS setup on the 35R... but for now, im happy with what we have...

ill post Zachs chart compared to another similarly sized turbo shortly.

(i do feel Garret is far superior to any other brand, but I am biased because the race cars i drove used them)

cb
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #268  
discopotato03's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Yes Garretts BB cartridges are good its just that some turbine and compressor combinations are expensive or impossible to get off the shelf .

I think some TR30R's and twin scroll turbine housings are the things to watch . There is so much interest now in the twin scroll turbo arena that Garrett can't really afford to ignore it .
Hopefully with developments in direct chamber injection and even cleaner fuels manufacturers can get away from the high exhaust manifold pressure induced "exhaust gas recirculation" and lean towards TS systems to get "clean power".
I think then we'll see more OEM TS turbo engines and organisations like Garrett will be expected to make more road car sized TS turbos - and divided twin valve gates .

Cheers A .
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #269  
yellowEVO21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
have there been any results with the ts 35r yet?
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 11:26 AM
  #270  
ZyBeR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere on the Planet
result bump
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:53 AM.