Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

HTA 35r, new power gains and the quest for 150 mph trap speeds.

Old Nov 2, 2007 | 01:04 AM
  #46  
ONRAILS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Dave. I love you already for all the testing and r&d you do for our cars.

But I'd love you more if you share the secretes.


Oh and FYI guys I met dave at the shootout. Had an issue with a part that was 4yrs old of his! and he had since redesigned it so it was almost a complete different part. Lets just say he stood behind his 4yr old out dated design and did me very WELL!. A real stand up guy!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 02:06 AM
  #47  
RSGuy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Dave, I'm going to go ahead and say 734whp dynojet. If that's what it is, can I get a discount on a turbo kit?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 03:28 AM
  #48  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Lot of good info here.....
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 03:53 AM
  #49  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Wow... that much power on a 35R... WTF is the point of even getting a 37R?

Good God Dave, if I got the money when I get back from the Philippines, I'm sold on an HTA35R kit.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 05:37 AM
  #50  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
As long as we are on the subject, the "37r" as it is called, is only good for about 40 whp max over a good 35r from any testing I have done and that is pushing it. My choice is 35r, after that, right now, there isn't anything that offers enough extra power to offset the lag that you have to tolerate.
Another well respected tuner I was talking to as well was saying he does not like the 37R because there is very little power difference (he said even less than 40 wheel), between it and the 35R yet you pay in response big time.

Pay attention to these guys people! They know what they are talking about!

(Keep in mind from the above they are talking about a well setup 35R.. not HTA)
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 06:03 AM
  #51  
4ringturncoat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: MI
To HTA my 3065 or go to the 35r...
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 06:14 AM
  #52  
Nesiop's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by 4ringturncoat
To HTA my 3065 or go to the 35r...
35r.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #53  
duracell55's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: South Florida, USA
go HTA 35R you'll love it
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #54  
Nesiop's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Of course he'll love it... The standard 35r spools up fine, and when people like DB were always concerned about lag on a daily driver and use the turbo, that tells you something.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:06 AM
  #55  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I have not weighed my car at all this year, neither of them (black drag car is mine too). Hell I barely dyno'd it! haha I don't know what it weighs. I'm going to guess between 3000 and 3100 with Trent in it. Trent is about 170 pounds.

The peak power with a standard 35r is about the same. I keep saying this as I don't want anyone running out to buy an HTA thinking they are going to be killing the top end power of there current 3582 turbo.

Yes, I still have the Full Race header on the car. My winter project is to build a new header for the car. I want to do a one off custom header just for my own car and have some ideas. This current kit is going to be going on a friends car that is here now.

The upgrade from a normal 35r to an HTA, I AM GUESSING, will be around $500. You will need to send the turbo directly to FP to have it done.

evovin, I answered that question atleast twice in this thread. There is no answer to it, go back and read what I wrote please.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:10 AM
  #56  
4ringturncoat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Nesiop
Of course he'll love it... The standard 35r spools up fine, and when people like DB were always concerned about lag on a daily driver and use the turbo, that tells you something.
It looks like the new hta35r will spool as fast as my current non hta 3065. It would be intersting to see what a HTA3065 will do.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:12 AM
  #57  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by Nesiop
Of course he'll love it... The standard 35r spools up fine, and when people like DB were always concerned about lag on a daily driver and use the turbo, that tells you something.
Don't get me wrong here. I am happy with the power, the curve and peak are extremely impressive. The turbo is still not what I PERSONALLY consider fun to drive. Sure, when it hits it's fun, but waiting for it is not fun. Under 4,000 rpm is not fun. For a great/fun daily driver I say hands down go with the 20gLT/Green turbo, now that is a fun car to drive. With 4 different cars now running in the 10's with the 20gLT/Green and quite a few others running 11.0-11.1's, it is the turbo of choice for me 99% of the time.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:33 AM
  #58  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
DB you said that your engine is 2 years old now and even though it sat over the winter....how many miles do you have on it? Just curious! Thanks man!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #59  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by caLi4G63
I gotta say, that horsepower curve is nice and FLAT in the higher RPM range, that's impressive!
It's the torque curve that one ideally wants to be flat, not the power curve. A flat power curve means torque is dropping. The ability to sustain a flat torque curve as rpm rises causes the power curve to go UP.

FYI
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:20 AM
  #60  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Making a flat torque curve in a 2 liter engine is extremely difficult to do , so while what you are saying Ted is correct it isn't something that happens very often, if at all.

Even our black shop car has a difficult time making a flat torque curve. It doesn't even make peak torque until 8,000 rpm and can't keep it flat past 9,000 rpm. So it's a pipe dream asking for a flat torque curve with any usable RPM.

I'd say a flat HP curve is what you want, having one that climbs would be ideal as long as the car also has a usable power band. This takes us back to the black shop car. The HP continues to climp past 9,000 rpm but for comparison at 6600 rpm the black car is making 350 whp where my RS is making 650 whp.

One of these cars (my RS) has a power curve you can drive and enjoy, the black car does not.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 PM.