Ams Evo Cam Test
BC's are not garbage, they just weren't a match for Martin's car. In fact, they are the ONLY cams that added power down low.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
Last edited by Fireball; Apr 1, 2009 at 12:51 PM. Reason: Flaming...
BC's are not garbage, they just weren't a match for Martin's car. In fact, they are the ONLY cams that added power down low.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
Last edited by Fireball; Apr 1, 2009 at 12:51 PM. Reason: flaming removed
BC's are not garbage, they just weren't a match for Martin's car. In fact, they are the ONLY cams that added power down low.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
The three best cams in this test might only be in the middle of the pack on a different block with a different head and turbo.
All cams are a calculated compromise based mainly on rpm range, but also on flow and VE at given points. Did anyone notice that all of the highest peak-power cams had the worst low end? The Kelfords were exceptional, but that just means they were the perfect match for Martin's setup. Anyone who buys cams based solely on this test is confused unless you have the same bore, stroke, turbo, manifolds, and headwork as Martin's car.
Last edited by Fireball; Apr 1, 2009 at 12:53 PM. Reason: flaming removed


