Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

fp red

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #61  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by Mellon
CO_VR4 are you seriously going to try to convince us that 100 octane is pretty much the same as 93 and doesn't allow for more boost or timing? cmon now
No, what I'm "seriously trying" to get you to understand is that 100 octane is NOT race gas (as some have termed it), and was being used in this circumstances (26PSI) to have a better margin against detonation, not to increase power. Anyone who has ever compared their fuel and timing maps between pump and race gas knows that C16 or similar fuels have totally different maps than 100 unleaded or any other gas you get out of the pump... 100 UL may, in some areas, allow for more boost, but it wasn't done here, limited to 26PSI, when the ambient temps are in excess of 100F.

The point is that that, as tested, there is no major difference in performance numbers between 93 and 100 octane at the boost level of 26PSI.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #62  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by CO_VR4

The point is that that, as tested, there is no major difference in performance numbers between 93 and 100 octane at the boost level of 26PSI.
Boost is not everything, if it was, everyone with a MBC would be a tuner.

Saying there is no performance advantage between using 93 and 100 octane is ignorant.

The "as tested" disclaimer obviously protects your statement a little bit. I still think it's really stupid to run 100 octane and run the same timing, AFR and boost as 93, but if you like spending more for the same performance, go ahead.

Last edited by razorlab; Aug 6, 2008 at 10:56 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #63  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by razorlab
No I get that part. I pump 100 octane into my car every week from a pump here in Kalifornia. I get that part, but I never call it "pump gas". I can also pump 110 octane if I wanted.

You can throw up a huge batman search light into the sky and say it's able to be pumped from a pump at a gas station which makes it pump gas. It still won't change the fact that people on this board understand that "pump" means 87-93 octane.

This whole laughable issue is getting pretty retarded. You can run leaner AFR and more timing on 100 compared to 93 octane, you can also run more boost if you want. So let's all give each other a group hug and just say 100 octane is a whole 7 points more octane then the next "pump gas". It might not be race gas in the leaded rocket fuel sense, but it sure isn't pump gas.
I can count just like most of the EvoM readers. What is "pump gas" in some parts of the country is obviously different than others. We continue to swerve off topic, though, because you continue to try to make an issue out of the use of 100UL fuel while you ignore the fact that the boost in the test you complain about was limited to 26PSI, thus limiting any significant advantage in power that might in other circumstances be a legitimate topic of discussion.

You are welcome to your own opinion as to what is "stupid". Personally, I think that using the extra safety margin obtained by upping the octane of your fuel and preventing detonation in a non-knock-equipped car by spending an extra $1.xx per gallon for your fuel is pretty smart.

Last edited by CO_VR4; Aug 6, 2008 at 11:10 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #64  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by CO_VR4
while you ignore the fact that the boost in the test you complain about was limited to 26PSI, thus limiting any significant advantage in power that might in other circumstances be a legitimate topic of discussion.
Not ignoring it at all, you are ignoring that boost isn't everything.

93 limited to 26psi

vs

100 limited to 26psi

I would place my bets on #2 every single time that it will make more power.

I'm done with this simply laughable discussion we are having, as at this point, we aren't even talking about the red anymore.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #65  
LilRico's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Cut throat, Orlando
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
let me know where i can find a DBB 45r for 1800.00.. ill buy them all. LOL

Its not just changing wheels.. Its the work that goes into development, labor to build and machine the turbo, the billet wheel is not cheap also.. alot of factors play a role..
Well... I guess I need to know a little more into what goes into making the turbo and I should of said 40R to some 42R's .....
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #66  
evolved83's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
So how many of these are you going to be able to produce within the next few months?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #67  
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
So let's all give each other a group hug
Count me in on the group hug, but nobody better grab my a$$!

So how many of these are you going to be able to produce within the next few months?
I think we will build a couple hundred over the next few months, lord willing and the creek dont rise, as they say here in Texas.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 01:29 PM
  #68  
SpoolnupTuning's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: NORTH CAROLINA
Originally Posted by razorlab
Not ignoring it at all, you are ignoring that boost isn't everything.

93 limited to 26psi

vs

100 limited to 26psi

I would place my bets on #2 every single time that it will make more power.

I'm done with this simply laughable discussion we are having, as at this point, we aren't even talking about the red anymore.
razor i have to agree on this one!! more octane means more timing, we all should know what that means
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #69  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
I'm certain that I'm wrong, but 93 octane has a faster flame front than 100 octane. Because of that, 93 doesn't NEED the timing that 100 octane uses. Remember, the maximum force on the piston should STILL occur at the same point in piston travel. Now, introduce more HEAT (such as Texas and Oklahoma are currently experiencing) into the intake vs say 75-80 degrees on the West Coast, or even 90 degrees, and typically, in OK, TX, we need to PULL timing to compensate for the heat. IF the 100 octane allows for more timing in MOST parts of the country, that is tremendously negated by the heat we experience in OUR part of the country. Now, where am I wrong. Sorry for the OT Robert, but not everyone understands 105-110 degree temps like you and I experience in our part of the world. I would imagine that what we run on 100 here in the summer heat is pretty close to what others in cooler parts of the country run on 93. Even 1-2 degrees more would not result in much power difference, maybe 5-10 whp.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 12:47 AM
  #70  
brazilbro's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by PsychDr. HN$
I would say that you def need a FMIC. Try the ETS 3.5. you prolly couldve went with the single pump with 1200cc. Are you going to do anything with the exhaust manifold before the tune? im subscribed because our set-ups will be very similar. Good Luck and subscribed
I have the XS POWER exhaust mani, as far as the pump i havnt ordered it yet.. i'm still trying to decide if i really need the double or not , and if i should get the 1000's or the 1200's injectors=(
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 05:17 AM
  #71  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 5
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Robert: Can the Red be fitted with a 9.8 HS?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #72  
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
No reason why you couldn't other than you may spool it up fast enough to have a surge problem perhaps?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #73  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
wouldn't a 9.8 defeat the purpose of the turbo....that's like buying a 35R and putting a tiny exhaust on it.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #74  
SpoolnupTuning's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: NORTH CAROLINA
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
Count me in on the group hug, but nobody better grab my a$$!



I think we will build a couple hundred over the next few months, lord willing and the creek dont rise, as they say here in Texas.
Robert i was wondering how much boost you are getting on wastegate pressure?? do you think that 23 is too much for the fp hp actuator?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #75  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Finally got to have a RED in my hands.. Very sweet turbo.. Customer snagged and i forgot to take pictures of it before he left.. We have 3 more on hand though if anyone is interested.. They wont stay long i am sure..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:44 PM.