Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AMS F1 vs Magnus V5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #136  
Evokid03's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Well ( DAVE ) i will be purchasing a Manifold soon for my 2.1 built 6262 setup.
WHich manifold would re recommend for my 2.1 motor. Im plainin on pushin the car pretty hard. She will have bascially every upgrade possible in hopes to make 700whp

Driven Innoviations
Ams F1-I
JMF Drag
Magnus v5
Buschur Fabricated

I really would like your opinion since you obviously are among the most knowledgeable in this thread
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #137  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Sean if you want and have time I can send my V5 that was mentioned before in this thread. It's up to you.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:45 PM
  #138  
Evokid03's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
or u can maybe sell it to me ^
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #139  
Colt4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 742
Likes: 2
From: New Albany, IN
Thanks for the test Sean its much appreciated by myself and MANY others. Looks as if the F1 is doing very well! Hopefully we will see other intakes in the near future.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 05:29 PM
  #140  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
Originally Posted by Evokid03
or u can maybe sell it to me ^
PM me your address and I will send it.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 06:19 PM
  #141  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Well.................of course I think ours is the best, if I didn't I wouldn't have finalized it and started building them. This is not a smart *** answer.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #142  
Evokid03's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
^ trust me i figured it would be urs. Personally im considering you among the rest because of the price.. Seems to be very fair

Uve been pmed dave
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 06:58 AM
  #143  
NitrousOxide's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: UAE
David, why dont you send Ivey your intake so that he can generate more results? Perhaps the owner of the car would be so generous to do more testing
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #144  
Philthy748's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Sean@Iveytune
Before with the previous setup we were stuck around 604-602 wheel a few days go, after putting the AMS intake on WITHOUT DOING ANY TUNING AT ALL, at same 30psi boost had to be upped on the AEM boost controller, it belted out 63x, cooled it a bit and ran again 64x.
Quick question Sean, was the previous setup with the BR head and the new setup with the Headgames head? If so, would you attribute the large gains more to the Headgames head rather than the AMS intake..? Would you also confirm that the results between the Wilson and AMS were both done on the same exact setup/heads..

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7813087-post95.html
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 07:02 PM
  #145  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Sean has no desire to do intake manifold testing, he's said that already. On top of that I'm not sending my intake to anyone for testing, I did my homework and testing already.

The Headgames head was used for both tests and was tested against our head months ago. If my memory serves me correctly Sean said he gained 6 whp and the testing wasn't back to back.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #146  
HeadGames's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: EWING,NEW JERSEY
yea..the headgames head picked up 10hp and 26tq.

Last edited by HeadGames; Dec 19, 2009 at 06:47 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 04:31 AM
  #147  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Looks like the AMS F1 might be the new best thing for intake manifolds. It has the big gains up top without the low RPM huge losses like the Magnus consistently shows

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Dec 19, 2009 at 04:34 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 05:22 AM
  #148  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Guess I'm going to have to stay with my VSR and just deal with 600awhp on pump
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 05:32 AM
  #149  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by Sharkbite2000
Guess I'm going to have to stay with my VSR and just deal with 600awhp on pump
Sounds hard
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 06:58 AM
  #150  
Sean@Iveytune's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: Linden, NJ
Originally Posted by Philthy748
Quick question Sean, was the previous setup with the BR head and the new setup with the Headgames head? If so, would you attribute the large gains more to the Headgames head rather than the AMS intake..? Would you also confirm that the results between the Wilson and AMS were both done on the same exact setup/heads..

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7813087-post95.html
No the head swap was done months ago. In this test the only thing that was swapped was the intake and the intake gasket, and temp sensor moved in the pipe.

Sean
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:35 PM.