Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

T3 vs T4 1.06 twinscroll housings, any power/response difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2012 | 11:25 PM
  #196  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by akauf
typo, didnt mean to have 6266 twice there.

so your going from an hta86 in a 1.06 to a 6466 in a 1.15?

if I can get a hta86 in a 1.15 it will be a tough decision between these two turbos
yes i am going from HTA86/1.06 to 6466/1.15. its actually the only change i made other then weight reduction and clutch.

from a few tests i saw running the 6466 its a promising turbo. but you also cant go wrong with the HTA86. its been a great turbo for me. i just feel that ****ty ATP part was holding me back and i wanted to give the PTE turbos a try. if it dont work out and i still have my HTA86 turbo then it will be getting a 1.15 and being put back on.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 08:36 AM
  #197  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I've heard Garrett is coming out with new divided housings that will be made from Ni-Resist and use modern volute designs specifically for the GT turbine wheels.

Anybody have more info/"know if it's true" or even dates?

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Apr 10, 2012 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:25 AM
  #198  
foxbear2277's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: canada
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
I've heard Garrett is coming out with new divided housings that will be made from Ni-Resist and use modern volute designs specifically for the GT turbine wheels.
Anybody have more info/"know if it's true" or even dates?
No info here but id like to know too...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 02:44 AM
  #199  
el.guerrero's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Italy
guys one question


Do you think that a 6262 cea openscroll 0.82 a/r will spool later then a 6266 cea twinscroll 1.06 a/r?
on a stock 2.0l
(same fuel same good tune)

Thanks a lot
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 04:53 AM
  #200  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
Smaller turbo and a/r. Should be faster. Peak power will be less.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #201  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
6266 in a 1.15 if you are going to do it.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 07:20 PM
  #202  
discopotato03's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Hi from Australia .

Good peoples you are probably finding that the reason why its had to get a decent turbine housing for your GT35XXR turbo is because they are based on the smaller GT25 ball bearing center section .
Once you jump up a frame to the one used in GT37R/GT40R/T04R the problem seems to evaporate .
There is actually a couple of larger frame GT35 and GT35R versiona out there and I think they were OE on some Hino and Isuzu truck diesels . I think the Isuzu engine family was call Si Tek or something like that .
I think the turbine housing ARs were something like 1.05 and 1.17 ish and twin scroll T4 International style .
Note they were available in bush and BB cores , I have a damaged bush one here somewhere and I'll see if I can read its ID plate . May be able to cross reference turbine housing part numbers from there .
My one has an 82mm GT40 compressor I think in 82 trim and like most/all these bigger frame units it is a theaded bore wheel - no jamb nut .

Maybe an easy answer is to base some of these turbos on the GT37R core and fit an 82 or 86mm HTA wheel to that .

Damn shame there is no T4 TS GT30 turbine housings and I don't see Garrett ever doing them either .

A .
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #203  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by discopotato03
Hi from Australia .

Good peoples you are probably finding that the reason why its had to get a decent turbine housing for your GT35XXR turbo is because they are based on the smaller GT25 ball bearing center section .
Once you jump up a frame to the one used in GT37R/GT40R/T04R the problem seems to evaporate .
There is actually a couple of larger frame GT35 and GT35R versiona out there and I think they were OE on some Hino and Isuzu truck diesels . I think the Isuzu engine family was call Si Tek or something like that .
I think the turbine housing ARs were something like 1.05 and 1.17 ish and twin scroll T4 International style .
Note they were available in bush and BB cores , I have a damaged bush one here somewhere and I'll see if I can read its ID plate . May be able to cross reference turbine housing part numbers from there .
My one has an 82mm GT40 compressor I think in 82 trim and like most/all these bigger frame units it is a theaded bore wheel - no jamb nut .

Maybe an easy answer is to base some of these turbos on the GT37R core and fit an 82 or 86mm HTA wheel to that .

Damn shame there is no T4 TS GT30 turbine housings and I don't see Garrett ever doing them either .

A .
Adrian, that is what FP has done with the 3786. If the Si Tek used a Navistar/International housing I wonder if the US 6.5 Turbo diesel (also a 35R based turbo) had anything in that range. Maybe a variant here anyway.

ATP has a recast 30R T4 housing but I havent seen that one, the 35R was less than desirable. What about an unmachined P trim? I think those were a 72.5mm turbine (37 stuff right?) but I know they had the larger sizes available.

aaron
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 07:02 AM
  #204  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by discopotato03
Damn shame there is no T4 TS GT30 turbine housings and I don't see Garrett ever doing them either .
ATP sells the 1.06 a/r T4 TS for the 30r and 35r. Also, Garrett will be releasing the v-band TS units early next year for the 30r and 35r.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 07:13 AM
  #205  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Drifto saw 600whp using an HTA3076R, E85, and a 1.06 A/R divided T3 housing. Being that one cannot realistically expect more power using that turbo, it demonstrates that a T4 housing isn't necessary for GT30R setups.

I see that ATP lists a v-band 1.06 A/R divided T3 housing here:
1.06 TS T3

As for the ATP housings in general, I didn't notice any obvious internal fault with my 1.06 TS T4 unit. I checked the alignment, and everything appeared to be correct. I did clean some casting flash in the interior with a Dremel, but it was minor. I'm curious to know what others have found specifically that was disappointing.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 12:01 PM
  #206  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by Ted B
Drifto saw 600whp using an HTA3076R, E85, and a 1.06 A/R divided T3 housing. Being that one cannot realistically expect more power using that turbo, it demonstrates that a T4 housing isn't necessary for GT30R setups.

I see that ATP lists a v-band 1.06 A/R divided T3 housing here:
1.06 TS T3

As for the ATP housings in general, I didn't notice any obvious internal fault with my 1.06 TS T4 unit. I checked the alignment, and everything appeared to be correct. I did clean some casting flash in the interior with a Dremel, but it was minor. I'm curious to know what others have found specifically that was disappointing.
EvoDan and Dave K (other board has an active discussion) both saw extreme variations in casting quality and had issues with cracking. I am glad to see that they may have been in the minority though.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #207  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
EvoDan and Dave K (other board has an active discussion) both saw extreme variations in casting quality and had issues with cracking. I am glad to see that they may have been in the minority though.

yes my T4 atp 1.06 housing was complete junk. the casting was terrible. when i pulled the housing off it was cracked in 4 spots on the inside divider. that is why i went with the PTE turbo and PTE T4 1.15 housing. which looks like it is made extremely well. i was supper happy with the casting
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 05:51 AM
  #208  
tupac1's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: sydney australia
I've got atp 1.06 rear on hta3586 too and its terrible quality had cracks all over the inside divider.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 03:14 PM
  #209  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by tupac1
I've got atp 1.06 rear on hta3586 too and its terrible quality had cracks all over the inside divider.
call FP. i believe they can machine you a 1.15 housing for that turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2013 | 05:00 PM
  #210  
riceball777's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
i have a HTA gt3582r with the divided atp 1.06 ar hotside with a full race t4 twinscroll manifold. This setup has been on my car for the past 4 years with over 80,000 miles with no problems. I wonder if my housing is all cracked up if i were to take the turbo/manifold off.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:39 AM.