for anyone that has crankcase pressure issues
the one in front of the pcv is so if the pcv fails the check valve is a backup wall to block the potential failure.
no need for a check valve on the valve cover to air intake side.
also check this out; http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=333816

the mother of all dry sumps.
the mother of all dry sumps.
Nice review... ill be doing this once i get the built motor in.
That Dry sump seems pretty rowdy as well, never really read about them though. How much is that Norris built one?
That Dry sump seems pretty rowdy as well, never really read about them though. How much is that Norris built one?

Road racing is expensive, but the dry sump is far and away the best option for those having oil starvation issues. The Norris design kit is one of the better ones I have seen, but for the street or even mild-medium track use (drag or auto-x) it is overkill, I would try an accusump setup before going to the dry sump if you are having issues.
If you have serious blowby wouldn't this indicate that you have badly seated rings? Block might be in need of another rebuild, this is the correct way to fix blow by issues. Whats your compression? Sorry I didn't read through the whole thread, might have missed some info.
did you remove the throttle body for instant 500+ HP at all times?
TS you dont need the one way valve or pcv in the line from cam cover to can . since you already checked any pressure going in with the check valve in the line from mani to can.


???
fluid and vapours will not flow freely across those valves and even air your trying to vent is having a hard time passing them too!
can 1 needs a vent too
i know you've done lots of searching and lots of input in this thread but that just rubs against MY grain.
wanting to learn what you found to go with that setup


???
fluid and vapours will not flow freely across those valves and even air your trying to vent is having a hard time passing them too!
can 1 needs a vent too
i know you've done lots of searching and lots of input in this thread but that just rubs against MY grain.
wanting to learn what you found to go with that setup
Last edited by leecavturbo; Jan 21, 2011 at 10:50 AM.
Just joking about the TB thing above. About sump venting. I believe it is very important to address as TSCOMP has. Very small inconsistancies in CC pressure can drastically change the health and performance of combustion, turbo, and lubrication. Exp, a + pulse can shove oil out the turbine seal and rings. Too much suction might fight oil pressure. And lack of catch will send oil right into the combustion chamber (esp cyl1) for sudden octane drop.
Emissions aside... oil or oil vapor should NOT enter the intact tract at any point.
The crankcase pressure should be reduced as much as possible. The vaporized oil should not be put back into the engine.
If you can do those above... you'll get most of the way there. there are certainly ways to reduce how the crankcase pressure is generated, but that would be a case to case basis.
Good luck.
The crankcase pressure should be reduced as much as possible. The vaporized oil should not be put back into the engine.
If you can do those above... you'll get most of the way there. there are certainly ways to reduce how the crankcase pressure is generated, but that would be a case to case basis.
Good luck.
Picked up the SS fitting & check valves and a couple other things from those links you posted Tom. Colling @ Toxicfab will be making me a dual sealed catch can and I may get it coated by TCC also...




