Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 04:17 PM
  #2686  
michaelrc51's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Originally Posted by tsitalon1
Ok guys, so I am completely new to BW turbos as I've always used FP or Mitsu turbos in my Dsm and Evo's.

Please excuse me as I don't really want to read 179 pages to get basic info.

From my understanding, the intrest in these turbos boils down to maximum spool, hope I'm right with that.

I'm currently on a FP Green and I will be looking to maximize my torque curve and maintain 400-450whp..

I would really like 300wtq at 3000 rpms if possible.

Am I right in thinking the 7163 might be the BW turbo for me? Do they mount to our manifolds or will we need custom manifolds and down pipes?

Yes, they have great spool but the overall powerband is huge. They hold the power level over a huge amount of RPMS. Plus they have built in BOVs and come in IWG or EWG.


You will need a different exhaust manifold and also downpipe. They are T3 or T4
housings and they have to placed in a particular spot to clear everything due to the length of the overall turbo.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 06:49 PM
  #2687  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tsitalon1
Ok guys, so I am completely new to BW turbos as I've always used FP or Mitsu turbos in my Dsm and Evo's.

Please excuse me as I don't really want to read 179 pages to get basic info.

From my understanding, the intrest in these turbos boils down to maximum spool, hope I'm right with that.

I'm currently on a FP Green and I will be looking to maximize my torque curve and maintain 400-450whp..

I would really like 300wtq at 3000 rpms if possible.

Am I right in thinking the 7163 might be the BW turbo for me? Do they mount to our manifolds or will we need custom manifolds and down pipes?
Among the EFRs, the 7163 is what you'd want. Should be good for 400-450 whp depending on the quality of the pump gas.

As Michael said, the hotside comes in several different configurations and A/R ratios. The twin scroll is currently only available as an internal waste gate version. I have heard that Geoff has designed and built a new exhaust manifold for this TS T4 IWG version. In my conversations with BW, they said that the TS hotside should be good for 97% of the power of the SS version while having much better transient response. I think the heavy duty TurboSmart WGA is needed though. I happen to have that turbo and WGA available if you are interested.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2014 | 10:01 PM
  #2688  
Grimgrak's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,622
Likes: 17
From: Panama
7163 vs new bbk when is it gonna happen?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 03:54 AM
  #2689  
tsitalon1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
Originally Posted by mrfred
Among the EFRs, the 7163 is what you'd want. Should be good for 400-450 whp depending on the quality of the pump gas.

As Michael said, the hotside comes in several different configurations and A/R ratios. The twin scroll is currently only available as an internal waste gate version. I have heard that Geoff has designed and built a new exhaust manifold for this TS T4 IWG version. In my conversations with BW, they said that the TS hotside should be good for 97% of the power of the SS version while having much better transient response. I think the heavy duty TurboSmart WGA is needed though. I happen to have that turbo and WGA available if you are interested.

Sounds very interesting, I'll have to hold off for a bit as I have a lot going on right now.

How does the spool compare to a JB FP Green?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 07:12 AM
  #2690  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tsitalon1
Sounds very interesting, I'll have to hold off for a bit as I have a lot going on right now.

How does the spool compare to a JB FP Green?
If you mean transient response, it will be much better.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 09:56 AM
  #2691  
URQaudiguy's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
The 7163 should be compared to a HTA3076r or GTX3076r for overall power potential on .82 AR. Spool on a dyno is almost identical to these two garrett options, but transient is much better due to a turbine that isn't a turd and undersized. Not a knock on FP, as their compressors work well.

I really would love to see a hypothetical 68lb/min 59mm 7670 revamped with mixed flow and put into a vband in/out b1 frame. I am aware of the reasons it can't right now(mainly housing meat and turbine length), but the IWG 7163 packages really nicely in very tight places, like behind the motor on a Audi TTRS. It would be nice to have an upgrade path above the 7163


Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 01:33 PM
  #2692  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by URQaudiguy
.... behind the motor on a Audi TTRS. It would be nice to have an upgrade path above the 7163 ....
That's a nice picture. Looks like the Audi has lots of room for a gently curved turbine outlet pipe, and it is more on the compressor inlet where the air slams into a rather hard 90 degree bend.
Anyway on that turbine outlet, can you say what the bend radius is of the pipe there, and what the pipe diameter is?
Also, is the pipe truly tangent to the turbine outlet where they meet, or is there a bit of an angle there (non-tangent)? Can't really tell in this view.

Last edited by Talonboost; Aug 7, 2014 at 01:40 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 01:55 PM
  #2693  
URQaudiguy's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Talonboost
That's a nice picture. Looks like the Audi has lots of room for a gently curved turbine outlet pipe, and it is more on the compressor inlet where the air slams into a rather hard 90 degree bend.
Anyway on that turbine outlet, can you say what the bend radius is of the pipe there, and what the pipe diameter is?
Also, is the pipe truly tangent to the turbine outlet where they meet, or is there a bit of an angle there (non-tangent)? Can't really tell in this view.
Both the inlet and the outlet bend radius's are dictated by packaging constraints. Thus my desire for a 7670 to be packaged into a b1 frame size, as the small b1 is already hard to stick in compact car bays, especially on cars like the evoX or this TTRS where the turbo is against the firewall.

Though the downpipe is using all full radius bends with no cheat. Doesn't get much better then that.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 02:34 PM
  #2694  
dcshoeco16's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: MD
New BW EFR Turbo Thread-kfrruw8.jpg

Here is that same STi however we switched from the V Band to the twin scroll (along with an air to water instead of a TMIC)
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 02:45 PM
  #2695  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
Originally Posted by dcshoeco16

Here is that same STi however we switched from the V Band to the twin scroll (along with an air to water instead of a TMIC)

Why more boost?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 03:04 PM
  #2696  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
Its less boost (and power) with the twin scroll, though definitely interested in why different boost levels were used - if it's capable of making similar power then that'd be awesome but the result doesn't suggest that.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 03:07 PM
  #2697  
dcshoeco16's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
Why more boost?
This car is an SCCA Solo car so the owner was looking for more down low and slightly better transient out of low speed turns - boost on the dyno peak numbers are a little high but they both make 34~ psi in the logs peak but the slightly more restrictive t4 housing wouldn't do anymore up top power or boost wise - however at 2800rpm it is up 60lb/ft of torque over the vband housing
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 03:10 PM
  #2698  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
Originally Posted by MrLith
Its less boost (and power) with the twin scroll, though definitely interested in why different boost levels were used - if it's capable of making similar power then that'd be awesome but the result doesn't suggest that.
Ah the ib app doesn't enlarge pics enough..
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 04:58 PM
  #2699  
tsitalon1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
Originally Posted by dcshoeco16
This car is an SCCA Solo car so the owner was looking for more down low and slightly better transient out of low speed turns - boost on the dyno peak numbers are a little high but they both make 34~ psi in the logs peak but the slightly more restrictive t4 housing wouldn't do anymore up top power or boost wise - however at 2800rpm it is up 60lb/ft of torque over the vband housing

Awesome! !

At what rpm do you think a 4g63 2.0l would hit 300wtq on 93 pump gas on this turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2014 | 05:45 PM
  #2700  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by dcshoeco16


Here is that same STi however we switched from the V Band to the twin scroll (along with an air to water instead of a TMIC)
kinda what I expected to see with the TS. to me the open scroll looks like more fun for a street car. but it does pick up a heap down low. great for track car.

still want to see results on a well prepped 4g63. wonder if geoff finished his car yet?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 AM.