When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
We look forward to see the results.
The RRE Dynopack reads quiet high: there is a thread where a guy took his Evo to GST motorsports in Hayward and than to RRE, and posted the results..I think Dynopack read higher than DJ, compared to Mustang..forgot the details..but should not be hard to find.
I mention it because it would be nice to be able to accurately relate the numbers to another dyno.
In my experience the GST/FFTec Mustangs read exactly 0.85 of Dynojet Power, i.e. you can multiply Dynojet Number by 0.85 to get the number that the Mustang would read for same car.
We look forward to see the results.
The RRE Dynopack reads quiet high: there is a thread where a guy took his Evo to GST motorsports in Hayward and than to RRE, and posted the results..I think Dynopack read higher than DJ, compared to Mustang..forgot the details..but should not be hard to find.
I mention it because it would be nice to be able to accurately relate the numbers to another dyno.
In my experience the GST/FFTec Mustangs read exactly 0.85 of Dynojet Power, i.e. you can multiply Dynojet Number by 0.85 to get the number that the Mustang would read for same car.
Enjoy
Correct. In general, Mustang reads lowest, then DynoJet, then DynaPack. DynaPack seems to read 8% higher than DynoJet, on average.
Correct. In general, Mustang reads lowest, then DynoJet, then DynaPack. DynaPack seems to read 8% higher than DynoJet, on average.
I've ran my Evo IX on both local dynos, one being UMS Tunings Dynapack and the other AZ Dyno Chip's Dynojet. They were within 1% of each other and believe it or not the Dynojet read higher. I put down exactly 450whp on the Dynapack and 454whp on the Dynojet. My Evo X put down 330whp on the Dynojet a couple weeks back, I wanna throw it on the Dynapack and see what it does
I've ran my Evo IX on both local dynos, one being UMS Tunings Dynapack and the other AZ Dyno Chip's Dynojet. They were within 1% of each other and believe it or not the Dynojet read higher. I put down exactly 450whp on the Dynapack and 454whp on the Dynojet. My Evo X put down 330whp on the Dynojet a couple weeks back, I wanna throw it on the Dynapack and see what it does
Oh, wow. That is odd. One of them must have changed the correction factor? Just goes to show dyno just how relative dyno numbers really are.
We look forward to see the results.
The RRE Dynopack reads quiet high: there is a thread where a guy took his Evo to GST motorsports in Hayward and than to RRE, and posted the results..I think Dynopack read higher than DJ, compared to Mustang..forgot the details..but should not be hard to find.
I mention it because it would be nice to be able to accurately relate the numbers to another dyno.
In my experience the GST/FFTec Mustangs read exactly 0.85 of Dynojet Power, i.e. you can multiply Dynojet Number by 0.85 to get the number that the Mustang would read for same car.
Enjoy
RRE has reconfigured their correction, it now reads very closely, if not identical to, a Dynojet
I am getting the 3B/2.0XTR for my 2.3. SO yeah, it should be good enough for a stroker. IIRC, it's kinda between an FP Green and a Red, but with spool much better than a Red.
I also just put my order in for a 1.0XTR this morning cause I got tired of waiting for results
I got to ride in MrFreds car with a 3B this weekend to see the response in 2nd gear and it hits just about perfect for a street car (full power hits just about 4k in 2nd gear) but was little slower than what I want in an AutoX car considering my plans.
How long have others been taking to get their turbo?
