Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2020 | 06:08 PM
  #106  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
Do you have a dyno graph ? I would like to see it if you have it , interested in seeing the curve as I run R2’s also and probably never really noticed the drop up top in power cause I usually only rev to 7500-7800.
Welp I guess this fully derailed now.

My car (going to 8500), and then the clearly higher numbers are a 2.4LR, ETS Twinscroll 6466 1.15ar, ER ported head, R2's, and Magnus street (older sheet metal) intake, revving to 8300.

ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)-photo310.jpg
ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)-photo21.jpg

These are same graph, different pics. Couldn't remember which one showed rpm. This is a 2.2L, ETS twin scroll 6466 1.15ar, S3's, and a magnus V5 intake, and. Buschur head. It's getting a better head next month and will pick up power, and over. This is on really like all of it. 43psi, revving to 9200. And we picked 20hp (820 to 843) going from 17* to 18* out the top. The head just isn't flowing like it should be, IDC starts falling right after peak power because the head doesn't have the VE.

ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)-photo605.jpg
ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)-photo625.jpg

Originally Posted by hokiruu
Do you happen to know what A/R was used on this? .83 I presume?
I do not know.

Last edited by letsgetthisdone; Jan 30, 2020 at 10:01 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 09:58 AM
  #107  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
Do you have a dyno graph ? I would like to see it if you have it , interested in seeing the curve as I run R2’s also and probably never really noticed the drop up top in power cause I usually only rev to 7500-7800.
FWIW, my car (IX) with R2's, ported stock intake, 2.15L, 6268 (S362SXE) on pump.





Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 10:02 AM
  #108  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
FWIW, my car (IX) with R2's, ported stock intake, 2.15L, 6268 (S362SXE) on pump.
Pump can be deceiving because your running low boost for the turbo and never run into back pressure. And it shows with how the the power curve just climbs and then barely levels off. That thing looks fun to drive.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 12:12 PM
  #109  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Pump can be deceiving because your running low boost for the turbo and never run into back pressure. And it shows with how the the power curve just climbs and then barely levels off. That thing looks fun to drive.
I wouldn't qualify 33psi as low boost for this turbo at 8K RPM on a 2.15L. Its a 61.4mm compressor inducer and matchbot says 33psi at 8K RPM on a 2.15L is just about riding the choke line. The Borgwarner Engineer who setup matchbot warned me that I am pushing the turbo close to its limit at that boost, but probably OK for SXE, but definitely a NoGo for EFR without the speed sensor to confirm no overspin. Would need a speed sensor to confirm, but boost tapers because turbo is more of less out of steam (within 1-2psi). Strongly debating to buy a 6673 with 0.81 a/r just for fun.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 02:59 PM
  #110  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Welp I guess this fully derailed now.

My car (going to 8500), and then the clearly higher numbers are a 2.4LR, ETS Twinscroll 6466 1.15ar, ER ported head, R2's, and Magnus street (older sheet metal) intake, revving to 8300.

Attachment 322768
Attachment 322767

These are same graph, different pics. Couldn't remember which one showed rpm. This is a 2.2L, ETS twin scroll 6466 1.15ar, S3's, and a magnus V5 intake, and. Buschur head. It's getting a better head next month and will pick up power, and over. This is on really like all of it. 43psi, revving to 9200. And we picked 20hp (820 to 843) going from 17* to 18* out the top. The head just isn't flowing like it should be, IDC starts falling right after peak power because the head doesn't have the VE.

Attachment 322769
Attachment 322770



I do not know.
Thanks for posting , that looks fun!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 03:03 PM
  #111  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
FWIW, my car (IX) with R2's, ported stock intake, 2.15L, 6268 (S362SXE) on pump.



Thanks for posting ! That’s pretty impressive spool for pump on a decent size turbo!!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 03:21 PM
  #112  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by 240Z TwinTurbo
I wouldn't qualify 33psi as low boost for this turbo at 8K RPM on a 2.15L. Its a 61.4mm compressor inducer and matchbot says 33psi at 8K RPM on a 2.15L is just about riding the choke line. The Borgwarner Engineer who setup matchbot warned me that I am pushing the turbo close to its limit at that boost, but probably OK for SXE, but definitely a NoGo for EFR without the speed sensor to confirm no overspin. Would need a speed sensor to confirm, but boost tapers because turbo is more of less out of steam (within 1-2psi). Strongly debating to buy a 6673 with 0.81 a/r just for fun.
But if you ran E85 you could run more boost down low (40psi or whatever) and let it taper. This would make more low end torque, and it would hit peak power earlier and taper off as the compressor ran out of steam and made less boost. Regardless of that. 33psi a pressure ratio of 3-3.5:1 depending on intake and atmospheric conditions. Your making 600whp. So at most you're using 65lb/min of air, you're probably right in the 74% efficiency island. Looking at the comp map, you're much more in the sweet spot than riding compressor choke. That turbo should make 700+ cranked up on good fuel.

https://www.full-race.com/store/toyo...sxe-8376-62mm/
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 05:11 PM
  #113  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by ctfpevoVIII
Thanks for posting ! That’s pretty impressive spool for pump on a decent size turbo!!
Spool is actually better on the street (~200rpm) as you can see below because the dyno does not sufficiently load the engine vs the street. Didn't see this discrepancy with the GTX3582r (street vs dyno), but definitely do on this turbo due to the 6mm larger turbine wheel. Log below is street vs dyno spool both in 3rd gear.


Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 05:26 PM
  #114  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
But if you ran E85 you could run more boost down low (40psi or whatever) and let it taper. This would make more low end torque, and it would hit peak power earlier and taper off as the compressor ran out of steam and made less boost. Regardless of that. 33psi a pressure ratio of 3-3.5:1 depending on intake and atmospheric conditions. Your making 600whp. So at most you're using 65lb/min of air, you're probably right in the 74% efficiency island. Looking at the comp map, you're much more in the sweet spot than riding compressor choke. That turbo should make 700+ cranked up on good fuel.
Choke line is 78lbs/min and you are below 60% efficiency. 78lbs/min can make 650hp or it can make 750hp depending on ignition timing so you can't necessarily equate HP to compressor flow. If I ran C16 it might make another 100hp as you suggest, but the turbo is pumping out the same amount of air from the compressor at 33psi in both cases.

EDIT: Matchbot says ~72lbs/min on pump gas based on the calculations, but I acknowledge this makes a lot of assumptions so need a speed sensor to accurately plot flow based on compressor map. My only point is that for a given flow you can have a wide range of torque due to ignition timing.

Last edited by 240Z TwinTurbo; Jan 30, 2020 at 08:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2020 | 08:06 PM
  #115  
3gturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 8
From: Charlotte
Ill let you know in a couple weeks when I get everything installed had to send that turbo back though since it was the smaller one and I ordered the larger one.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2020 | 07:41 AM
  #116  
blackline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 767
Likes: 122
From: NYC
Originally Posted by 3gturbo
Ill let you know in a couple weeks when I get everything installed had to send that turbo back though since it was the smaller one and I ordered the larger one.

That's nice!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can't wait to see the results.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2020 | 10:46 AM
  #117  
mines5's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 870
Likes: 23
From: Streets of willow
Any update on this ?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2020 | 12:06 PM
  #118  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Running into more delays on this because of the COVID fiasco. English Racing has a tuning day setup here 2 May. Should be good to go for that.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2020 | 09:12 AM
  #119  
mines5's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 870
Likes: 23
From: Streets of willow
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Running into more delays on this because of the COVID fiasco. English Racing has a tuning day setup here 2 May. Should be good to go for that.
Will be waiting to see the results.

By looking at the specs i am still confused to which turbo it is comparable with
6466, 6266 or any 800 hp capable EFR series.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2020 | 07:44 PM
  #120  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
I'm still hoping the T4 divided housings come out soon.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 AM.