Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 12:41 PM
  #1  
blackline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 763
Likes: 118
From: NYC
ETS Quick spool Turbo kit(G30)

Does anyone have any experience with the G30 turbos on a 2.0L, Dyno Graphs, Spool, Comparison to other turbos?

ETS Kit

Last edited by blackline; Nov 6, 2019 at 12:44 PM. Reason: link
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 12:49 PM
  #2  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,971
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
I'm currently building a 2.2L for a client that has the G30-770 kit going on it. Expect results in late December or January.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 12:56 PM
  #3  
blackline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 763
Likes: 118
From: NYC
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I'm currently building a 2.2L for a client that has the G30-770 kit going on it. Expect results in late December or January.

Awesome! Can't wait to see what it pushes out.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 01:26 PM
  #4  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Man that sounds like a awesome kit if it can spool as fast as a evo 9 turbo and make what there advertising for power ! Can’t wait to see some results.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 01:43 PM
  #5  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,971
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
@wanabgts has the G25-660 on his 2.0L Evo 9. Stock cames, it made 400wtq at 4000rpms, and (IIRC) 560whp at 30psi out the top. I don't recall what peak torque was. So, it's a bit slower to 400wtq than a 9 turbo. Those usually see 400wtq by ~3700ish.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 02:00 PM
  #6  
blackline's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 763
Likes: 118
From: NYC
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
@wanabgts has the G25-660 on his 2.0L Evo 9. Stock cames, it made 400wtq at 4000rpms, and (IIRC) 560whp at 30psi out the top. I don't recall what peak torque was. So, it's a bit slower to 400wtq than a 9 turbo. Those usually see 400wtq by ~3700ish.

Damn!

Is it safe to assume this is on E85?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 02:54 PM
  #7  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,971
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by blackline
Damn!

Is it safe to assume this is on E85?
Yes it was.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2019 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
@wanabgts has the G25-660 on his 2.0L Evo 9. Stock cames, it made 400wtq at 4000rpms, and (IIRC) 560whp at 30psi out the top. I don't recall what peak torque was. So, it's a bit slower to 400wtq than a 9 turbo. Those usually see 400wtq by ~3700ish.
Thats still pretty impressive !!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2019 | 11:48 PM
  #9  
ConEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 135
Likes: 5
From: EvoNation
I personally wait for the results of the G35-900.... A turbo which has a 6466 potential but hopefully will move the peak torque and boost to the left. If it spins somewhere (500-800rpms) faster than the PTE 6466 equivalent. So it will have a fatter powerband. I can't imagine what those turbos would do on e85 and 2.4 builds
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2019 | 03:04 PM
  #10  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Originally Posted by ConEvo
I personally wait for the results of the G35-900.... A turbo which has a 6466 potential but hopefully will move the peak torque and boost to the left. If it spins somewhere (500-800rpms) faster than the PTE 6466 equivalent. So it will have a fatter powerband. I can't imagine what those turbos would do on e85 and 2.4 builds
Is the G35 available I saw the G20 and G30?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2019 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,971
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
It's not out yet.

I also don't see it spooling faster than a 6466 and being 900whp capable.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2019 | 03:44 PM
  #12  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
G25 book marked.

FYI: If buying during current sale, buy the intake kit separately, as it's discounted price isn't reflected in the drop-down menu for the turbo kit. You would end up paying an extra $50 (it's only $199 if purchased separately).
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2019 | 04:24 PM
  #13  
Ayoustin's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 648
From: SC
Pretty sure I've posted this before.



Last edited by Ayoustin; Nov 8, 2019 at 04:29 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2019 | 02:16 AM
  #14  
ConEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 135
Likes: 5
From: EvoNation
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
It's not out yet.

I also don't see it spooling faster than a 6466 and being 900whp capable.
Unfortunately, PTE did not disclose any maps, so it would be difficult to have a direct comparison between them. We will have to wait and see the results. But if the g35 does not spool earlier than 6466, I do not see a reason for swapping from PTE to Garrett. But my bet is that the g35 or even better, the g30-900 will spool better than PTE and be more efficient at lower boost pressures. Probably will be better in transient response terms and match EFR series
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2019 | 08:18 AM
  #15  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,971
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by ConEvo
Unfortunately, PTE did not disclose any maps, so it would be difficult to have a direct comparison between them. We will have to wait and see the results. But if the g35 does not spool earlier than 6466, I do not see a reason for swapping from PTE to Garrett. But my bet is that the g35 or even better, the g30-900 will spool better than PTE and be more efficient at lower boost pressures. Probably will be better in transient response terms and match EFR series
Well, the gen2 3582 is kind of already what you're describing. Just doesn't make 900whp
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.