Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine
152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63
355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny
138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny
109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD
132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo
164
24.01%
Exterior looks
305
44.66%
Interior quality
148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight
79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding
165
24.16%
Price
261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity
133
19.47%
Brakes
163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times
201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll

Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:03 PM
  #1111  
theheff's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
skidpad 0.88 wtf...
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #1112  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally posted by theheff
skidpad 0.88 wtf...
It depends on the surface on which the test was done.
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:15 PM
  #1113  
trigeek37's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Originally posted by modvp


It depends on the surface on which the test was done.
and not having Ronald McDonald driving....
I don't get how the same publication can test a car 2 times and get such different numbers....
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:53 PM
  #1114  
darknightohio's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Nope link still works try again.
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #1115  
Leadfoot's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
"The system can not find the specified file"

Michael
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:03 PM
  #1116  
darknightohio's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Leadfoot try right clicking and saving to desktop then playing through windows media player. The link still works for me....
Reply
Old May 6, 2003 | 09:16 PM
  #1117  
Leadfoot's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
OK, I stand corrected, my appologese...It makes no sense to me, it worked fine for me this morning by just clicking on it, and now my stupid computer wants to play hard to get.... oh well, thanks for putting me straight, love seeing those rigs sideways!

Michael
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 12:17 AM
  #1118  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Quad Cities
Originally posted by SGOSWRX
Interesting figures but with todays electronics/chips you can over ride the electronically limited top speed. I would guess the STi will easily surpass 155mph top speed.

I purchased a 99z28 that was electronically limited to 116mph. It was limited to 116mph because the car came with 2:73 gears and the touring package. (all season tires - not Z rated).

I bought a hypertech reprogrammer for $350 and reprogrammed the computer and then took the car out and ran an easy155mph.
I sincerely hope you put Z-rated tires on it before attempting that kinda speed. Otherwise you have a death wish. If your car had QFZ or QLC RPOs equiped, No governer. It was all in the tires..Im sure you know that.. but.. I hope you didn't run that fast with those stock tires.
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 12:34 AM
  #1119  
Jonasan50's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
That's wrong!! I have personally been at 150mph (at a track!) and my RPMS were at 6300!! Twice!! So I know that before redline I can hit 160mph!! Somethin is weird there...
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 09:00 AM
  #1120  
hornet's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Ahem!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...h&pagenumber=1
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 09:50 AM
  #1121  
Tracer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Ca/Hi/Ga
Jonason50 is exactly correct about the redline ting. Been there in mine.
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 06:06 PM
  #1122  
Harvs O-Z's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: PA
COOL VID!!
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 07:56 PM
  #1123  
lil'evil_evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,424
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Car and Driver EVO vs STI

Ok not on newstands yet, but for the new C&D they test the EVO and STI. The Evo WINS. The reason why the Evo won is becasue the way it handles over the STI . I love it. The STI was rated a 88 overall and the EVO got a 91. Check it out real good article. If any of you know who Peter Solberg is he is the one who tested both cars. Just in case you don't he is one of the best dirt track car drivers around.
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 08:04 PM
  #1124  
vegetta's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Peter Solberg test both cars....methinks you read something wrong.
Reply
Old May 7, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #1125  
Mark F's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Re: Car and Driver EVO vs STI

Originally posted by lil'evil_evo
Ok not on newstands yet, but for the new C&D they test the EVO and STI. The Evo WINS. The reason why the Evo won is becasue the way it handles over the STI . I love it. The STI was rated a 88 overall and the EVO got a 91. Check it out real good article. If any of you know who Peter Solberg is he is the one who tested both cars. Just in case you don't he is one of the best dirt track car drivers around.
Read the sidebar. Rod Millen tested both cars on dirt and preferred the Evo.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 AM.