View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine



152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63



355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny



138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny



109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD



132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo



164
24.01%
Exterior looks



305
44.66%
Interior quality



148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight



79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding



165
24.16%
Price



261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity



133
19.47%
Brakes



163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times



201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll
Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]
there is also a thread on this topic in the "General" part of the evo forums. however, I will respond, not flame.
1) by everyone, you mean who??? I've never said that, so obviously not everyone. A lot of us are still waiting for specs, so no one really knows, now do we?
2) how are you defining "faster"? 0-60 and the 1/4 aren't the only ways to look at how fast a car is.
3) They CLAIMED that is the fastest 4 door. first, look at part 2, then remember that it is ADVERTISING. They are promoting their product obviously.
4) WRX is more reliable than the Evo.... got proof? In what department?
In conclusion you truly ARE asking to be flamed. If you are going to make claims, make them properly, please.
1) by everyone, you mean who??? I've never said that, so obviously not everyone. A lot of us are still waiting for specs, so no one really knows, now do we?
2) how are you defining "faster"? 0-60 and the 1/4 aren't the only ways to look at how fast a car is.
3) They CLAIMED that is the fastest 4 door. first, look at part 2, then remember that it is ADVERTISING. They are promoting their product obviously.
4) WRX is more reliable than the Evo.... got proof? In what department?
In conclusion you truly ARE asking to be flamed. If you are going to make claims, make them properly, please.
Originally posted by EvoWannabe
there is also a thread on this topic in the "General" part of the evo forums. however, I will respond, not flame.
1) by everyone, you mean who??? I've never said that, so obviously not everyone. A lot of us are still waiting for specs, so no one really knows, now do we?
2) how are you defining "faster"? 0-60 and the 1/4 aren't the only ways to look at how fast a car is.
3) They CLAIMED that is the fastest 4 door. first, look at part 2, then remember that it is ADVERTISING. They are promoting their product obviously.
4) WRX is more reliable than the Evo.... got proof? In what department?
In conclusion you truly ARE asking to be flamed. If you are going to make claims, make them properly, please.
there is also a thread on this topic in the "General" part of the evo forums. however, I will respond, not flame.
1) by everyone, you mean who??? I've never said that, so obviously not everyone. A lot of us are still waiting for specs, so no one really knows, now do we?
2) how are you defining "faster"? 0-60 and the 1/4 aren't the only ways to look at how fast a car is.
3) They CLAIMED that is the fastest 4 door. first, look at part 2, then remember that it is ADVERTISING. They are promoting their product obviously.
4) WRX is more reliable than the Evo.... got proof? In what department?
In conclusion you truly ARE asking to be flamed. If you are going to make claims, make them properly, please.
I know 4 door got its advertage, thats y is "EVO VS STi"
Once you get an EVO, you will found out.
EVO always overheat cuz of the FMIC blocking the radiator, it has been talked about in a lot of japanese racing video tape.
I think u should ask Claudius about that, I'm sure he will beg to differ...and u say "always"...u been there for every single EVO?
How can u be driving a car that comes out 2 years from now?
I think Evowannabe is right..u might be asking for it...
How can u be driving a car that comes out 2 years from now?
I think Evowannabe is right..u might be asking for it...
I could never figure out why people take the time to read threads about the a car they don't own, don't like or even worse don't have clue about
Reminds me of days of "I bet my dad can beat up your dad" bit
Also the overheat was not radiator but recommendation that one of first mods to do is get better and larger oil cooler.... On side note both WRX and EVO are both great machine but just because 4-door AWD sedan doesn't make them same. PEACE
Reminds me of days of "I bet my dad can beat up your dad" bit
Also the overheat was not radiator but recommendation that one of first mods to do is get better and larger oil cooler.... On side note both WRX and EVO are both great machine but just because 4-door AWD sedan doesn't make them same. PEACE
The biggest question for me is, which car can be tuned to have much higher maximum figures and.. or in other words, which has better "upgradability".
Also, from what I have seen in some STi pics, it seems as though there is no FMIC... is it still in that "inter-warmer" spot?
Also, from what I have seen in some STi pics, it seems as though there is no FMIC... is it still in that "inter-warmer" spot?
So unfair to call it an interwarmer...
The deep core and the ram scoop of the Rex/STi is great little feature. Very little pressure drop due to the proximity and length of all the piping to. http://www.rallispec.com/ <---great site for all the Subie fans...
Gotta love complete and engine and transmission upgrades. Still can't get over all the dueling of cars that don't exist in their US form yet.
The deep core and the ram scoop of the Rex/STi is great little feature. Very little pressure drop due to the proximity and length of all the piping to. http://www.rallispec.com/ <---great site for all the Subie fans...
Gotta love complete and engine and transmission upgrades. Still can't get over all the dueling of cars that don't exist in their US form yet.
Originally posted by pjal84
Yes, but you do realize that it is not in the BEST place to put it though in the first place. While I realize that it is a great intercooler, you do have to take into consideration that it is right above the engine.... which I think would be quite hot. That heat around the engine bay is going to affect some performance.
What I was getting at with this comment though was that since the intercooler is placed above the engine, there would be a loss in power compared to if it were put in the front. Therefore, with a FMIC, I take it that the STi would have a bit more power than stock, and possibly over that of the EVO's.
Each and everyday, I feel as though I am getting closer and closer to the STi side of things. Then again, we'll wait and see what comes about
so unfair to call it an interwarmer
What I was getting at with this comment though was that since the intercooler is placed above the engine, there would be a loss in power compared to if it were put in the front. Therefore, with a FMIC, I take it that the STi would have a bit more power than stock, and possibly over that of the EVO's.
Each and everyday, I feel as though I am getting closer and closer to the STi side of things. Then again, we'll wait and see what comes about
Last edited by BurnOutz; Nov 12, 2002 at 08:34 PM.
Originally posted by BoxerSTi
S202 has 320HP AWD and ligher, just like how WRX is faster then S4.
S202 has 320HP AWD and ligher, just like how WRX is faster then S4.
Yeah it weighs 3900lbs but remmeber the SL55 has the same engine and weighs 4310Lbs and do the quarter in 12.55@116.10 mph
0-60 4.39secs.Now imagine with 3900Lbs. Low 12's?
Last edited by gtr; Nov 12, 2002 at 08:28 PM.
Originally posted by BoxerSTi
If a car is faster then another car 0-60 and 1/4 , that define faster.
If a car is faster then another car 0-60 and 1/4 , that define faster.
not really. If you go to the quarter mile strip and you see a rwd and an awd car, where the awd beats the rwd with something like 104 mph at 12.9 and the rwd at 99 mph at 12.7...wouldnt' you wonder what would happen in the next 15 mph?

