Yes we made 502 whp on a mustang dyno using FIC 1100 injectors.

 

wow car looks like a beast

 

oh wow, them stock evo X pump work great. So i quess my evoX just need injectors when iam going with bigger turbo.

 

Awesome build Jeremy! Keep pushing the limits of that MR, all that R&D is paying off. Was great talking with you today!

 

The car is NOT on the stock fuel pump. This was done with a Walbro 255 drop in pump. The car is actually now on an MDR surge tank kit, fed by the intank Walbro 255, with another inline Walbro 255 pump. The stock Evo fuel pump can NOT supply enough fuel for this car, or any similar car like it in anything resembling a safe manner.

Other than ARP rod bolts, head studs, and Kelford 214b cams, the engine is stock. This is NOT a built motor.

I have the Dyno files saved from when we (MDR) went out there and tuned the car. Jeremy asked that I post them. Here is an overlay of two back to back pulls. It's blow off valve was a leaker, so getting stable boost out of the car was a challenge. This has since been fixed.

 

^^that's what i thought

 

When the car was tuned by HP Logic on a Mustang dyno which made 502 whp I had a stock fuel pump in the car.

The car has since been re tuned by MDR and now has a Walbro intank fuel pump with MDR surge tank being fed by another Walbro inline pump. Hope that helps clarify the situation

 

Any more events planned for this car? Great Job Jeremy/SSP!

Michael

 

There was only 5% difference between HP Logic's Mustang and MDR's dynojet?

- Bryan

 

502 would be an amazing feat on stock pump.. Must be MAGIC..

 

We used IAG's Dynojet, outside of Baltimore.

 

Well since all the cool kids on the interweb love to say dynojets can't be messed with then it doesn't matter right?

I'm still a bit perplexed that there was only 5% difference between that mustang dyno and a dynojet.

- Bryan

 

since this build is for the regular mr owner for the future as far as parts that are being developed I feel they should take it to the dragstrip with video so we can see how it performs. Not everyone can afford a racing team and get invited to time attack events. I dont know if anyone agrees with me on this. But the original build said the first 11 second mr build and not once have i seen video on the dragstrip. Dont advertise 11 second build if that is not what the car is used for. Advertise 75000 dollar time attack evo x mr that nobody can afford. I like the technology and ssp, but dont just talk prove to us that this really is a 11 second car, not just for time attack. I have seen it on you tube and a stock turbo evo x mr launches harder!!!!

 

So which one is perplexing you the Dyno Jet numbers or the Mustang numbers? I am confused as to what you are getting at exactly.
The hp difference is actually closer to 7% than 5%, and the torque difference is in the area of 50 ft/lb. ( I can't recall the exact numbers from the original tune) However the differences are meaningless and you know this.

The car was completely retuned, and the chart posted is what we got AFTER we tuned it. The map on the car was not the same as when Jack tuned it, so an initial baseline pull is not valid for direct comparisson.

 

Any reasons why you decided to replace the rod bolts?