Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Is a 4.2 second 0-60 normal for this tune?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2009 | 04:26 PM
  #46  
imdrew12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: rolla, missouri
I wanted to run a more in depth data log on how much boost I was running and when I was running it. How do I decipher the psi(boost) using the relative pressure log on the AP? It works just fine when I want to read it live, I have done the firmware update, I just want a decipherable log of it.

Seconds (sec) RPM (RPM) ECT ( F) TPS Voltage (V) Ign Advance ()
0 908 186.8 0.57 12

LTFT (%) Knock Retard (CA) WGDC Fine (%) MAF (g/s) (g/s)
-1.42 0 0 3.8

Abs. Pressure (PSI) Load Boost/Fuel (Load) Load Timing (Load)
5.08 20.94 22.5

Last edited by imdrew12; Jul 25, 2009 at 04:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #47  
imdrew12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: rolla, missouri
Originally Posted by tdubevox
223whp/243wtq baseline.
Originally Posted by tdubevox
Geezevox's GSR dyno'd at 264whp/280wtq on cbrd's mustang dyno with the Perrin stg 1 and stock filter.
Hp is close to Perrin's claims but tq isnt. I know all dynos are different, but that's a big difference in my eyes.


Last edited by imdrew12; Jul 25, 2009 at 05:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2009 | 05:56 PM
  #48  
tdubevox's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Originally Posted by imdrew12
Hp is close to Perrin's claims but tq isnt. I know all dynos are different, but that's a big difference in my eyes.

whp is off approx 8%, wtq 12%. I think it could easily be the dyno's. It's still a great off the shelf map if you have the AP.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #49  
imdrew12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: rolla, missouri
double post
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2009 | 06:26 PM
  #50  
imdrew12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: rolla, missouri
Originally Posted by tdubevox
whp is off approx 8%, wtq 12%. I think it could easily be the dyno's. It's still a great off the shelf map if you have the AP.
No doubt.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2009 | 11:31 AM
  #51  
rehtea's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: MD
Originally Posted by imdrew12
Ok, with a 1/4 tank of gas and 86 degree temp I ran another 4.20 and a 4.22. I am pretty happy. Now I need to see if it can handle a sub 4 second 0-60.
That's awesome. Now I'm seriously considering the 2010 MR.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #52  
imdrew12's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: rolla, missouri
How many HP do you think it would take to get a sub 4 sec time? Not that I really care, its just for bragging rights. Probably a nice weight reduction wouldn't hurt. Too bad I am looking at adding around a 100lbs of stereo equipment.

Boy, I have poor self esteem.

I wish I still had this.

Talk about an attention grabber. Especially in the middle of Missouri.
Attached Thumbnails Is a 4.2 second 0-60 normal for this tune?-child.jpg   Is a 4.2 second 0-60 normal for this tune?-dsc00649-medium-.jpg   Is a 4.2 second 0-60 normal for this tune?-dsc00657-medium-.jpg   Is a 4.2 second 0-60 normal for this tune?-dsc00666-medium-.jpg  

Last edited by imdrew12; Mar 5, 2010 at 12:55 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skyz
Evo X General
7
Jan 2, 2017 03:02 PM
kyoo
Drag Racing
13
Mar 8, 2011 10:22 AM
Jake26
Evo General
15
Feb 24, 2011 06:31 AM
MichalD
Evo General
16
Jun 28, 2008 11:25 AM
caymandiver75
Evo General
41
Sep 7, 2003 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 PM.