Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

CBRD BB-X turbo update... and products again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 02:24 PM
  #256  
Synaptic3e's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Candia, NH
Originally Posted by CBRD
372whp/338wtq on pump 93 (stock o2, downpipe, manifold, inlet pipe) DW 800's, AFE intake, Stock ic pipes, and crappy vertical fmic 27psi tapering to 25.2

stock turbo was 318/320ish at 26.8 psi tapering to 22 psi

I think we can pick up another 30-35whp with our new FMIC, IC pipes, AMS o2/downpipe, etc

cb
do you have a dyno chart for this? Interested - thanks
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 02:50 PM
  #257  
AlienEvoX's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by CBRD
372whp/338wtq on pump 93 (stock o2, downpipe, manifold, inlet pipe) DW 800's, AFE intake, Stock ic pipes, and crappy vertical fmic 27psi tapering to 25.2

stock turbo was 318/320ish at 26.8 psi tapering to 22 psi

I think we can pick up another 30-35whp with our new FMIC, IC pipes, AMS o2/downpipe, etc

cb
those are some nice numbers, I am really liking this turbo setup

by the way +1 on the graphs, I am very interested in seeing how the turbo behaves
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #258  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Here is an average pull on the BBK to a pull on the stock turbo, at very similar boost levels,

we made more power, but it was running more boost, this is to show a closer boost comparison!!



cheers

CB
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #259  
MicMcKee's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Outside Ellicott City, MD
Wow so that's 30whp and 40wtq difference without pushing it?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #260  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Nice Chad, can't wait to order mine soon.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #261  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Yay data! More please! More!!!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 07:20 AM
  #262  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
I am not happy with how pathetically wavy my tune was that day on the BBX LOL LOL LOL!!!

I just looked at it this morning and went, thats awful lol!!

I never raised the torque limiters on that tune ( i had converted to OS from Cobb) because I was rushed, and I think I could have made some corrections for more power and a smoother plot.

CB
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 10:03 AM
  #263  
Clark_Kent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: Smallville, KS
Chad,

In post 256 did you mean BBX compared to the stock turbo? A quick ninja edit may prevent any confusion. Looks good Chad. Thanks for sticking with this thread and providing updates and information to the community.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #264  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by CBRD
The turbo will hold 30psi easily... ; )

we found this turbo held 6 more psi at redline than the Garrett Gt3076R we had with the same WG duty cycle

cb
That's not necessarily a good comparison. IIRC, the Garrett has a larger wastegate port translating into more force on the wastegate valve. Also depends on which actuator you're using the how much preload is set. Assuming the actuator and preload are the same, the fact that the wastegate ports are different sizes is still a major variable.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 01:00 PM
  #265  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by spdracerut
That's not necessarily a good comparison. IIRC, the Garrett has a larger wastegate port translating into more force on the wastegate valve. Also depends on which actuator you're using the how much preload is set. Assuming the actuator and preload are the same, the fact that the wastegate ports are different sizes is still a major variable.
the garret required almost 85% on our car to hold 28 psi.... therefor it was trying pretty hard to make that boost (even with our actuator on it )

the hotside of the garret, in my opinion is designed wrong, thats one of the flaws we found, it basically directs the gas path DIRECTLY at the WG port... which causes issues (like flapper arms bending) etc...

we were an official tester for the Garrett turbo, and I held off on our own stuff because I hoped it would be a great turbo.... It didn't turn out to be, which kind of sucks....

I love their products and we use their parts for every ball bearing turbo we use, but the evo X turbo didn't do what we had hoped!!

the comment was simply that this turbo holds boost easier... and it does.


cb
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 04:44 PM
  #266  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
I also noticed the boost being directed at the WG on the GT3076r too much so next time I'm in there I'll get even more aggressive with the portwork to direct the main flow towards the wheels better.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 12:18 AM
  #267  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by spdracerut
That's not necessarily a good comparison. IIRC, the Garrett has a larger wastegate port translating into more force on the wastegate valve. Also depends on which actuator you're using the how much preload is set. Assuming the actuator and preload are the same, the fact that the wastegate ports are different sizes is still a major variable.
Sure it's a good comparison, the Garrett bolt-on makes crap for power and likes to self destruct. Doesn't matter the design of the wastegate port, it fails, so the design is a failure. So far the BBK on E85 has made more than a test Garrett, at less boost and less octane. Even the Dom 2.0 has made more power than any Garrett bolt-on through our shop, time and time again.

Nobody uses the Garrett bolt-on because it is a failed product. How often do you actually hear about that product anymore?

Just my 2 cents.

- Bryan

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Jan 30, 2010 at 12:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 12:38 AM
  #268  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
Sure it's a good comparison, the Garrett bolt-on makes crap for power and likes to self destruct.

Nobody uses the Garrett bolt-on because it is a failed product. How often do you actually hear about that product anymore?
mak
I was referring specifically to the wastegate duty cycle vs. boost pressure. Go check my 'quoted' section again. I only quoted the '6psi difference for same duty cycle'. And everything I said was correct. I did not speak to the performance of the turbo in any other regards.

Now, as the BBX does have a larger compressor wheel, this does make some sense as to an explanation. But, for the very limited info Chad said in his post, it's not adequate information.

Now, as for why you don't hear much about it, didn't they stop selling it after the discovery of the problem? ATP's dyno on E85 looks pretty stout to me....
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2010 | 12:47 AM
  #269  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by spdracerut
ATP's dyno on E85 looks pretty stout to me....
That was after the first turbo on that car blew up on our dyno, and they set their dynojet to match our mustang for a internet "white paper" after it came off our rollers so take those results with a grain of salt.

Anyway, it's a failed product in my mind and I won't recommend it to any customers. There are much better proven turbos out now for the 10. Garrett makes great turbos, unfortunately that wasn't one of them.

- Bryan
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #270  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402


a little addition to the BBX on our shop car

more pics to come!

cb
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 AM.