Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

CBRD BB-X turbo update... and products again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #196  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by IDRINKV8'S
How many pounds does that turbo flow also is it comparable to a evo 9 fp red 80mm in overall performance..........
56-57lbs
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:17 PM
  #197  
IDRINKV8'S's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by CBRD
56-57lbs
Almost like my red this turbo is for my friend.Which will make more power this or the red for the x...thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #198  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Waiting for some official numbers Chad.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #199  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by IDRINKV8'S
Almost like my red this turbo is for my friend.Which will make more power this or the red for the x...thanks.
I dont know!

we would have to have two very very comparable (or IDENTICAL) cars to make that deduction... and unfortunately its hard to make that happen!

numbers are coming guys!

our car picked up 65whp with the turbo bolted on, and 20ish wtq....

I have yet to have a competitors turbo here with the right mods.. I had one, with ALL the trimmings, fmic, piping, intake, turbo, injectors, ams downpipe, AMS catback with a STOCK CAT... 26 psi it made about 20 more whp than a stock turbo, and slightly less torque.

cb
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:48 PM
  #200  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Chad, when does this turbo achieve full spool?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 03:59 PM
  #201  
IDRINKV8'S's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by CBRD
I dont know!

we would have to have two very very comparable (or IDENTICAL) cars to make that deduction... and unfortunately its hard to make that happen!

numbers are coming guys!

our car picked up 65whp with the turbo bolted on, and 20ish wtq....

I have yet to have a competitors turbo here with the right mods.. I had one, with ALL the trimmings, fmic, piping, intake, turbo, injectors, ams downpipe, AMS catback with a STOCK CAT... 26 psi it made about 20 more whp than a stock turbo, and slightly less torque.

cb
U should compare it with mine ill be the gine pig..lol..
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #202  
Clark_Kent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: Smallville, KS
Read the thread. These questions are being asked every other page.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 04:10 PM
  #203  
Brokenevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Abilene Texas
thats cool you guys been trying to crack the issues with the X good job on you guys
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #204  
IDRINKV8'S's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: new york
Originally Posted by Clark_Kent
Read the thread. These questions are being asked every other page.
Funny guy i saw your sig nice tune u got there..
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2010 | 09:36 PM
  #205  
Clark_Kent's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
From: Smallville, KS
Charlie tuned the car. The car is fine thanks for your concern. You're not intelligent enough to create a **** DG Motors campaign with your drivel and glib remarks. I'm not here for amusement. It's simple...read the thread and stop wasting Chad's time with your dumb *** questions. Learn how to spell and speak like a man and and not a literacy challenged 9 year old.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 06:46 AM
  #206  
CBRD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
28psi by 3990 rpm in our car, in third gear, and I believe that would improve with ic piping (because of the swelling of the soft couplers) and a good o2 housing downpipe combo!

cb
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 06:47 AM
  #207  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
that 28psi is with stock cams too right? So possibly could change with cams for better/worse.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #208  
MicMcKee's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Outside Ellicott City, MD
Man I can't wait for official results on this,

Looks so promising...

Keep it up guys...
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 09:55 AM
  #209  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by CBRD
28psi by 3990 rpm in our car, in third gear, and I believe that would improve with ic piping (because of the swelling of the soft couplers) and a good o2 housing downpipe combo!

cb
I think it can make some power down low with different MIVEC tune...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 07:46 AM
  #210  
ugakirk's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 47
From: Evans, GA
Updates? I can't wait to see the results. I want this new BB-X.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 PM.