Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #3991  
arpad's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by GPTourer
I think it will be not significantly faster then the current car. I also think it will be heavier, safer, quieter and more effecient.
Sounds like an Audi. Bleh.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #3992  
blitzkrieg79's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally Posted by GPTourer
Why? I love when people say stuff like this.

I think it will be not significantly faster then the current car. I also think it will be heavier, safer, quieter and more effecient. Which will be an engineering marvel if they can pull it off, and they'll sell even more of them.
Why do you say it will be heavier? The new Outlander based on the new Lancer platform is actually a rather light car considering it's width, height, length. The new Outlander has an all-aluminum engine and an aluminum roof, so it goes to show that Mitsubishi with the new platform is serious about getting back in business.

I am more than sure Evo X will consist of a lot of aluminum body parts, an all-new aluminum engine, and all those things will make it roughly around the same weight as the current Evo IX while being slightly wider.

I don't think Evo X will be that much heavier than the current car. Add to that a more powerful engine (and, again, LIGHTER engine) and I can easily see this thing doing 4.2-4.5sec. 0-60 stock. And if they will put a larger displacement engine (say 2.4 l) the numbers might be even better.

Last edited by blitzkrieg79; May 18, 2006 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #3993  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by blitzkrieg79
I don't think Evo X will be that much heavier than the current car. Add to that a more powerful engine (and, again, LIGHTER engine) and I can easily see this thing doing 4.2-4.5sec. 0-60 stock. And if they will put a larger displacement engine (say 2.4 l) the numbers might be even better.

It's just the trend of all current manufacturers... new model = more weight.
BMW did the same.. putting aluminum suspension parts (Current Evo already
have this right?)... went as far as putting magnesium head... but still manage
to gain from 100 to 150 lbs...

I believe that price of luxury will outweight the benefit of all these aluminum-
lightweight gains... AND the worst of all... price hike..

IMO, big price increase already on the MR models over regular Evos.. just
so Mitsubishi can get to the 40k mark... It's like they are testing the water
with the MR models...
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #3994  
securitron81's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: GRand Forks AFB, ND
2.4 Baby!!!
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #3995  
securitron81's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: GRand Forks AFB, ND
paddleshift= awesome
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #3996  
EvoRobert's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Cupertino, Ca
I know that it's a prefrance, but I don't like it.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #3997  
SilverRally's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blitzkrieg79
It looks like Mini-Mustang, it looks like Acura TL, it looks like Mazda 6, it looks like Alfa Romeo, jeeezzzz people make up your mind, if you wanna be so **** about it then I guess every car has something from another car. To me Concept X looks like evolution of the 1999 Galant shape and I love it.
No really the Evo X really looks like the piece of poop that just came out my ***, J/K This will be mitsubishi first run with the paddel shifters so their might be some issues at first.
Reply
Old May 18, 2006 | 08:00 PM
  #3998  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Why do all you people assume because I said heavier and more refined that it will automatically be a Audi/BMW/or Lexus style of vehicle?

Heavier could just mean 20-40 pounds. More refined could just mean, more seat adjustments and a telescoping tilt adjust steering wheel and automatic climate control and less squeaks and rattles.

Safer could just mean more airbags and stability control.

No need to jump to conclusions and take things to the extreme.
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #3999  
blitzkrieg79's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Dirty Jersey
Originally Posted by JT-KGY
It's just the trend of all current manufacturers... new model = more weight.
BMW did the same.. putting aluminum suspension parts (Current Evo already
have this right?)... went as far as putting magnesium head... but still manage
to gain from 100 to 150 lbs...

I believe that price of luxury will outweight the benefit of all these aluminum-
lightweight gains... AND the worst of all... price hike..

IMO, big price increase already on the MR models over regular Evos.. just
so Mitsubishi can get to the 40k mark... It's like they are testing the water
with the MR models...
But Mitsubishi is in a transition of inserting all-aluminum engines to all of its cars, most of Mitsubishi cars still use cast iron engines with aluminum heads. That change alone should reduce the weight of the car a bit as engine is probably the heaviest part of the car.

Of course Evo X will be an all-new design so it can't be compared to Evo IX and just an engine swap from cast iron to all-aluminum so we will see.

But I bet the new Eclipse would shed a lot of pounds just from an engine change to all-aluminum.
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 09:04 AM
  #4000  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Originally Posted by Shahul X
Dont merge me I cant find much on that 200+ page merge on the evoX

First, Ive been outta the EVO loop for about a year and a half....
wow a blast from the past. welcome back!
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #4001  
ralliart2k4's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Irving, TX
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/e...eup/index.html

I think I'd crap my pants if I paid 3,570,000 for anything...yen or not.
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #4002  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by ralliart2k4
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.co.jp/e...eup/index.html

I think I'd crap my pants if I paid 3,570,000 for anything...yen or not.

????????????? what???
http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/co...submit=Convert

1 USD = 111.71 yen

3,570,000 yen = $31,957.75 USD

and thats for the MR model... which in US starts at $36,299.00

Thats some $4,300 MARK-UP... wonder who's willing to pay for that...
oh wait.. never mind..:-P
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #4003  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Using the same conversion rate..

GSR = (JDM GT) = 3318000/111.71=$29,701.91
RS = 2940000/111.71=$26,318.15
Reply
Old May 19, 2006 | 10:18 PM
  #4004  
EvoHung's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
I heard Mitsubishi will be sharing the new Xs body with Chrysler.
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #4005  
EquinsuOcha's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Originally Posted by JT-KGY
????????????? what???
http://finance.yahoo.com/currency/co...submit=Convert

1 USD = 111.71 yen

3,570,000 yen = $31,957.75 USD

and thats for the MR model... which in US starts at $36,299.00

Thats some $4,300 MARK-UP... wonder who's willing to pay for that...
oh wait.. never mind..:-P

That would be the government, with tariffs, import taxes, transportation from Japan and safety requirements. The dealership has an average markup of $1500 to $2000 on MSRP.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 AM.