Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]
Although I am quoting all of your post I have to say "right on" and I feel exactly the same way. Your minimalist approach is spot on, the new evo definately breaks that mold which might be Evolution? I dont know but man,...I was like "what he said",...
OK, so here's my two cents (although most of it's been said before...)
The Evo X looks like a nice machine. It will likely be faster and handle even better than our existing cars.
But-- and this is just one owner's opinion-- I think something's been lost.
The previous/current Evo has an appealing minimalist aesthetic. The parts that you touch-- seats, steering wheel, shifter-- are the best you can get. The parts that touch the road-- engine, wheels, tires, and brakes-- ditto. Everything else is just there to hold these parts together. It's obvious that the Evo's a rather low-end Japanese sedan with a lot of go-fast bolted onto it.
In fact, "go fast" pretty much defines the vehicle. The steering wheel is devoid of fiddly buttons controlling radio volume and whatnot; our cars don't have automatic climate control or cruise control because these items do not make the car go faster. No power seat adjustments? Who's going to be driving the car besides you anyway?
The Evo doesn't suffer posers gladly. If loud and rough and summer tires and no stability control are too high a price to pay for your fun-- if you're not willing to invest some quality time in learning the capabilities of the car-- then may we show you this nice BMW or Mazdaspeed or STI?
Additionally, the Evo's one of the last cars that's easy to work on in your garage. Interior bits pop out obligingly for you to run the wiring to your radar detector, or to swap the positions of the gauge pack and the radio. An entire industry exists to satisfy your urges to modify the car to your personal taste.
We can't blame Mitsubishi for moving the Evo upscale. As I noted, it will be a better car on paper, and sales will doubtless increase, which is something the company desperately needs.
But still...the first thing I noticed in the interior photos of the Evo X was that the huge button laden spokes of the steering wheel will make it impossible to get the kind of firm, intimate grip you can get on the current Momo wheel. And that kinda says it all.
The Evo X looks like a nice machine. It will likely be faster and handle even better than our existing cars.
But-- and this is just one owner's opinion-- I think something's been lost.
The previous/current Evo has an appealing minimalist aesthetic. The parts that you touch-- seats, steering wheel, shifter-- are the best you can get. The parts that touch the road-- engine, wheels, tires, and brakes-- ditto. Everything else is just there to hold these parts together. It's obvious that the Evo's a rather low-end Japanese sedan with a lot of go-fast bolted onto it.
In fact, "go fast" pretty much defines the vehicle. The steering wheel is devoid of fiddly buttons controlling radio volume and whatnot; our cars don't have automatic climate control or cruise control because these items do not make the car go faster. No power seat adjustments? Who's going to be driving the car besides you anyway?
The Evo doesn't suffer posers gladly. If loud and rough and summer tires and no stability control are too high a price to pay for your fun-- if you're not willing to invest some quality time in learning the capabilities of the car-- then may we show you this nice BMW or Mazdaspeed or STI?
Additionally, the Evo's one of the last cars that's easy to work on in your garage. Interior bits pop out obligingly for you to run the wiring to your radar detector, or to swap the positions of the gauge pack and the radio. An entire industry exists to satisfy your urges to modify the car to your personal taste.
We can't blame Mitsubishi for moving the Evo upscale. As I noted, it will be a better car on paper, and sales will doubtless increase, which is something the company desperately needs.
But still...the first thing I noticed in the interior photos of the Evo X was that the huge button laden spokes of the steering wheel will make it impossible to get the kind of firm, intimate grip you can get on the current Momo wheel. And that kinda says it all.
I have no basis for this, but I figured roughly $35K for the base model. Any more money and it seems to me that Mitsu will price themselves out of the market for this car (18-35 year olds). How many 25 year-olds will be buying $40K+ cars like the X? I always figured the VIIIs and IXs sold well enough because they were the best performance for the money. At $40K, I'll be looking at BMWs...
Evolved Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
From: Philly, Germany, Japan, UK...South Dakota (Da Sticks).......
EVO X Pricing?
Where did you hear that? Not saying you are wrong, but I'm interested if we can get an updated number.
I have no basis for this, but I figured roughly $35K for the base model. Any more money and it seems to me that Mitsu will price themselves out of the market for this car (18-35 year olds). How many 25 year-olds will be buying $40K+ cars like the X? I always figured the VIIIs and IXs sold well enough because they were the best performance for the money. At $40K, I'll be looking at BMWs...
I have no basis for this, but I figured roughly $35K for the base model. Any more money and it seems to me that Mitsu will price themselves out of the market for this car (18-35 year olds). How many 25 year-olds will be buying $40K+ cars like the X? I always figured the VIIIs and IXs sold well enough because they were the best performance for the money. At $40K, I'll be looking at BMWs...
I'm with ya here. If Mitsu. follows the auto manufacturers trend (the majority of manufacturers anyway) then we should see an approx. 5% increase in price. Which would put the standard Evo in around $31,000-$32,500 and the MR version $36,000-$39,000 depending on options. No idea on the RS version as it hasn't been announced that they are even going to build one yet.
I agree with those that say it doesn't look aggressive. Looks limp. I was loving the fender flares of the concept. Now the rear quaters panels are almost flat. Interior seems cheezier to me even more now than the 8&9. As others have said, front grill look like Audi. Narrow headlights look weaker than the concept. The steering wheel belongs in a pickup. Those wheels look like aftermarket low profile wheels like you'd see on a civic or neon. I'm all about improvements in technology with the engine and DSG, but this car looks weak. Seems like more of a sleeper look. To each their own...
At least I tried to elaborate on why I think it's ugly.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Where you come to vacation and go home on probation! Vegas!
Please delete your photoshop program,
It does, vertically flip the lights, and turn the outline grill shape upside down and you have an a4, but your acting like an a4 is a bad looking car, and audi makes damn good looking cars. Who cares MMC took styling cues from the Lexus IS350, Acura TL and Audi A4, all 3 of those cars are great looking vehicles.
What is "it doesn't look like an Evo", do you know what "Evolution" stands for? I Wouldnt want you to be a car maker. You have the same designs 30 years after first model production. I don't know what views your talking about, but all pics of the Evo X you can plainly see a intercooler, maybe your looking at the base lancer,
It does, vertically flip the lights, and turn the outline grill shape upside down and you have an a4, but your acting like an a4 is a bad looking car, and audi makes damn good looking cars. Who cares MMC took styling cues from the Lexus IS350, Acura TL and Audi A4, all 3 of those cars are great looking vehicles.
What is "it doesn't look like an Evo", do you know what "Evolution" stands for? I Wouldnt want you to be a car maker. You have the same designs 30 years after first model production. I don't know what views your talking about, but all pics of the Evo X you can plainly see a intercooler, maybe your looking at the base lancer,

Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,253
Likes: 0
From: Where you come to vacation and go home on probation! Vegas!
wow ..... you must be a moron or didnt watch the video as there is a 6-speed shown on the video
Originally Posted by Edmunds.com
More big news comes from the availability of a six-speed, dual-clutch transmission like Volkswagen's DSG unit. Shift paddles are mounted on the steering wheel, while a switch on the console delivers three different shift modes. For purists, a six-speed manual gearbox option will also be offered.
I'm with ya here. If Mitsu. follows the auto manufacturers trend (the majority of manufacturers anyway) then we should see an approx. 5% increase in price. Which would put the standard Evo in around $31,000-$32,500 and the MR version $36,000-$39,000 depending on options. No idea on the RS version as it hasn't been announced that they are even going to build one yet.
announced that there would be an MR version?
By the time you add navigation, S-AWC, larger wheels/tires, IC with display, upgraded sound system, turn signals in mirrors, steering wheel controls, side airbags, etc. I think the pirce would have to be a good bit higher than it currently is. These extras would really cut into their profits if they dont raise the price accordingly. Also if you opt for the auto trans with paddle shifters, that would have to cost more as well.
1. many of the extra add ons the 'prototype X' is sporting are either just for show (read: concept) or are completly fake. Remember, and this is very important, don't believe everything you see. While the overall shape of the car (interior and exterior) is product correct, the parts added to it for 'autoshow purposes' are there just for that reason. Mitsu. needs as many cameras as it can get pointing at their new halo car and all the fancy LED lighting, suede inserts and 20" wheels helps them get that.
2. if there's something you don't like on the car when it comes out, don't tick that option box. simple as that.


