Lancer Evolution X News, Info, Pics, etc... | [ALL THREADS MERGED]
.
I just had a tuning appointment with the biggest and best evo tuner in europe that also retails for a major US evo tuning company... He has seen and driven the evo X multiple times on the Nurburgring, and said it is astonishingly more responsive in both power and handling...
But I definately think it'll be a 2010 car. I'll bet Mitsu is looking at the USDM acceptance of the new STI to see if the sportback would fly here.
I just had a tuning appointment with the biggest and best evo tuner in europe that also retails for a major US evo tuning company... He has seen and driven the evo X multiple times on the Nurburgring, and said it is astonishingly more responsive in both power and
handling...
handling...
And you have over 2000 and this is how you behave? You do realize the evolutionm.net has a bad reputation for responses like that, right?
Go away.
Ahaha, iron sleeves don't mean anything. Have you noticed that all of the engines you've mentioned have trouble making big power without breaking? For instance. lets compare the LS1 vs ford's iron 5.0. LS1 is nice because its light and has tons of aftermarket support, but the 5.0 can put down absolutely insane amounts of power without breaking or distorting. IRON IS STRONGER, its a FACT. Wake up people!
Whats this on the RS model having an iron block? Will it be the 4G63??
Whats this on the RS model having an iron block? Will it be the 4G63??
As an example, I have 2 friends with nearly similar srt-4s. One has a DTEC piggyback and puts down 381hp at the wheels with his "weak aluminum block", the other is running an AEM EMS and lays out 408whp/406wtq. remember that's with a weak aluminum block and a mere 2.4L compared to the 5L 302 motors. These guys aren't even close to the real power making srts out there either. There's also a guy on the srt forum making 789whp (street legal too!) and it's reliable as far as the block and heads are concerned.
On another note, what I find interesting is the fact that the Lancer currently has the 4B11 world motor and the evo x is supposedly going to be using it as well. It looks as if for the first time the Lancer will be able to hot swap parts directly from the evo without much effort! Which will make the Lancer tuner market a lot better than it is now.
i might remind everyone that the number of posts shown under our names means absolutely nothing. evom did this a long time ago. I have around 1500 for instance yet it only shows 204.
As an example, I have 2 friends with nearly similar srt-4s. One has a DTEC piggyback and puts down 381hp at the wheels with his "weak aluminum block", the other is running an AEM EMS and lays out 408whp/406wtq. remember that's with a weak aluminum block and a mere 2.4L compared to the 5L 302 motors. These guys aren't even close to the real power making srts out there either. There's also a guy on the srt forum making 789whp (street legal too!) and it's reliable as far as the block and heads are concerned.
I tend to disagree. Ford boys blow motors all the time, just like anyone pushing any motor to its limits. The argument between the strength of aluminum to that of iron is really pointless. Aircraft are built out of aluminum and I don't exactly see too many dropping out of the sky because the "insane amount of power" coming from huge turbine engines distorted or warped the aluminum structure. The reason isn't the fact that in a 1/8" slab the iron has slightly higher strength than the aluminum slab, it is the shapes, gussets, supports that are created to make the aluminum structure actually stronger than a comparitive iron or steel one. AND, since aluminum is easier to machine and extrude, shops can make aluminum parts with the structural pieces a whole lot easier than they can with iron (and of course by iron block, it is meant cast iron). Therefore aluminum blocks can be made just as strong if not stronger than an iron block.
As an example, I have 2 friends with nearly similar srt-4s. One has a DTEC piggyback and puts down 381hp at the wheels with his "weak aluminum block", the other is running an AEM EMS and lays out 408whp/406wtq. remember that's with a weak aluminum block and a mere 2.4L compared to the 5L 302 motors. These guys aren't even close to the real power making srts out there either. There's also a guy on the srt forum making 789whp (street legal too!) and it's reliable as far as the block and heads are concerned.
On another note, what I find interesting is the fact that the Lancer currently has the 4B11 world motor and the evo x is supposedly going to be using it as well. It looks as if for the first time the Lancer will be able to hot swap parts directly from the evo without much effort! Which will make the Lancer tuner market a lot better than it is now.
As an example, I have 2 friends with nearly similar srt-4s. One has a DTEC piggyback and puts down 381hp at the wheels with his "weak aluminum block", the other is running an AEM EMS and lays out 408whp/406wtq. remember that's with a weak aluminum block and a mere 2.4L compared to the 5L 302 motors. These guys aren't even close to the real power making srts out there either. There's also a guy on the srt forum making 789whp (street legal too!) and it's reliable as far as the block and heads are concerned.
On another note, what I find interesting is the fact that the Lancer currently has the 4B11 world motor and the evo x is supposedly going to be using it as well. It looks as if for the first time the Lancer will be able to hot swap parts directly from the evo without much effort! Which will make the Lancer tuner market a lot better than it is now.
Last edited by sonicnofadz; Jul 30, 2007 at 09:10 AM.
I do believe the iron block will be used for current platform shared models other than mitsu. Thats the point of sharing components, so it isn't just one trim level.
Say what happened to the dodge caliber srt-4, maybe that would get the iron block too.
Edit: never mind its got an aluminum 2.4l
Say what happened to the dodge caliber srt-4, maybe that would get the iron block too.
Edit: never mind its got an aluminum 2.4l
my bad. i guess i was just going by this post and didn't look it up for myself. thanks for correcting the error though.
Under the discussion of aluminum engines, should I bring up the old VEGA engines. All aluminum block with no iron sleeves, only aluminum and impregnated silica. The engines got a bad rap, but it was because of poorly engineered valves and not the bad *** aluminum blocks.


