Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Game over for AEM EMS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #76  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by SilverIX
Facts or not...this is much like a political debate in that...there are MANY ways to accomplish the same thing. It usually boils down to plain old preference. What your experiences have been with such and such. Good, bad...it'll affect your future decisions. I personally find it rather impressive that Smog was able to make that much on an otherwise stock setup. Very cool. AND useful to know.

Whether I wish to spend MY money on AEM EMS or not isn't the point here. He's offering up a different 'path' way to achieve the same goal. I think that was very cool of him to share.
Very well said.. Politics and religion are the worst debates to get involved in.. This stuff tends to fall into that category.

Anyway, Its good that he ruffled a few feathers, I for one have a particular path in mind and therefore chose what I did for a reason. Many others may not have all the information they need to make the decision, at least they know that they have options. I have seen way too many butchered cars out there because people threw parts at their car and didn't really have all the info they needed, plus poor advice from people who may not have had all the data they needed to make an educated decision.. This just adds to their toolbox of knowledge.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #77  
dsevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 1
From: Kailua, HI
All I can add to this is that my car runs smoother now than it ever has, after having Dr. Gray tune my EMS. I wouldn't even think of going back to stock ecu. The idle control is simply amazing, and my car actually idles better when the a/c is on. While I do wish that I had given ecu flash a try before the ems, by no means do I plan on going back to stock ecu.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #78  
bolsen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Damn, I'm way too late to argue this one...
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #79  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
I prefer the Method that allows the MOST OEM parts to remain on the car. The Evo is SUCH an increadible package, no need to dilute it so much with crazy mods. I really can't see a need for the AEM EMS unless you have a crazy drag car. The Stock Ecu, especially teh IX, will do 99% of whever you need.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #80  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Zeus
I see this as a DISCUSSION of at what point does one really NEED a stand alone answer to engine management. I'd say few Evo owners really do.
So do I, and I agree 100%.

Smogrunner has made a very good point that contradicts certain misinformation perpetuated both within and outside of this forum, that being the factory ECU is incapable of providing enough fuel an ignition control to generate impressive power.

Baloney.

What Smogrunner's results illustrate is a standalone device isn't a necessity for the vast majority of applications, but is in fact a luxury when in capable hands, and a nightmare otherwise. I might note that I'm holding onto the Xede I am using presently, because I make very good use of features that the stock ECU does not deliver. These features are useful and advantageous, but none are essential.

Standalone ECUs are a virtual necessity in many applications (like my '86 SVO Mustang), but convincing a potential buyer that a standalone is a necessity to making good power with an EVO, especially in light of the open accessibility of ECU Flash, etc., is irresponsible. Smogrunner challenged this misconception, and he is correct.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #81  
TwStDeVo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: 5o5
Smoggrunner,

a couple of people in this thread have said its pointless to create, but i just want to thank you for creating it as i am in a tough situation deciding between the aem or flash and definitely need some help. i have pretty much the same mods as you minus the fuel system, but add a ported head, intake mani, thottle body, and a 3065r. i only plan to run pump (91) and alky.

your buid up has been very helpful to me, especially the problems you had with the stock maf. i would like to take precautions before they happen so im trying to find a good set up to take care of this. right now im thinking about the aem (tuned by david buschur), flash and maf translator w/gm maf, or flash and maft pro on speed density. i totally agree with you when you say "set it and forget it" as i dont have any tuning experience. any suggestions?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #82  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by Ted B
So do I, and I agree 100%.

Smogrunner has made a very good point that contradicts certain misinformation perpetuated both within and outside of this forum, that being the factory ECU is incapable of providing enough fuel an ignition control to generate impressive power.

Baloney.

What Smogrunner's results illustrate is a standalone device isn't a necessity for the vast majority of applications, but is in fact a luxury when in capable hands, and a nightmare otherwise. I might note that I'm holding onto the Xede I am using presently, because I make very good use of features that the stock ECU does not deliver. These features are useful and advantageous, but none are essential.

Standalone ECUs are a virtual necessity in many applications (like my '86 SVO Mustang), but convincing a potential buyer that a standalone is a necessity to making good power with an EVO, especially in light of the open accessibility of ECU Flash, etc., is irresponsible. Smogrunner challenged this misconception, and he is correct.


"Waved Ameican Flag and hummed the National Anthem while reading"
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #83  
nothere's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue. WA
ecuflash may very well be the nat's *** in about three months, from what I have seen so far you have a few people with flash lights looking around a basement.
Once they turn on the lights and everything becomes clear THEN you will have something.

It does look to be very promising!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 06:01 PM
  #84  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
. . . That said, any Evo owner can have a PERFECTLY running 500whp car, that is as daily driveable as a stock Evo. All they need is the basic bolt on mods with a 3076 turbo . . . A car like this will run 11.5 at 123mph with any ole Dork like you or me driving it.

. . . you can go with a stroker motor and a 35R with a reflash and go out and run 11.0 at 128 without a problem, over and over again with Falken Azeni street tires spinning all the way through 1st and a well into second gear . . .

If you need more than this, then by all means, go knock yourself out with a standalone.
Or you could have a 400-450whp car that hits full boost before 3000 rpms, makes almost as much torque as your 35R, uses a stock style turbo, and runs 11.3's or better on street tires.

BTW, I only have 360 whp but I spin my 285/30/18 Advan Neova's all the way through 1st. Nothing too special 'bout that . . .

Reasons to use EMS:
- control timing/fuel retard as backup safety for alcohol system
- control high/low boost
- control anti-lag, 2-step, nlts, etc
- run fun cams without stalling
- make more power with same mods
- 99.5% of users can't "toon" their own stuff, so they have to pay for tuning anyway
- run 1600 cc injectors with fun turbos
- user definable logging built in

I already knocked myself out with a standalone. Felt pretty good really.

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #85  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Reasons to use EMS. . .
But you might want to footnote that commentary by mentioning that said features are not exclusive to standalones. (FYI)
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #86  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Ted B
But you might want to footnote that commentary by mentioning that said features are not exclusive to standalones. (FYI)
I was not aware that a reflash could do those things. Care to elaborate? Thanks for any info you can provide.

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 07:46 PM
  #87  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I did not say that it could. All I said was one need not resort to a standalone ECU to get those features (and others as well).

Where reflashing is concerned however, the factory ECU does possess quite a bit of undeveloped capability. No doubt those who enjoy challenges are working to exploit every last bit of it.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #88  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
If you think I made up my own pricing, you are wrong. I took that pricing straight from Buschur Racing. It is the complete kit with all the sensors etc, which is exactly what I'd need if I was going to switch to it . . .
Sorry to nit-pick. The $2400 you listed is the price installed and tuned for pump gas and race gas. You would save $200-400 tuning it yourself. I had mine up and running with a wideband for under $1500.

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #89  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Ted B
I did not say that it could. All I said was one need not resort to a standalone ECU to get those features (and others as well).

Where reflashing is concerned however, the factory ECU does possess quite a bit of undeveloped capability. No doubt those who enjoy challenges are working to exploit every last bit of it.
Ok, so you said that not only standalones can provide those features, then you implied reflashes could not either, so are you talking about a piggyback ECU? Like the V-branded Australian unit? Interesting . . . idea - use the reflash to control ignition and fuel, etc, and use the interceptor to add more features like a stand alone would offer?

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 08:05 PM
  #90  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Ok, so you said that not only standalones can provide those features, then you implied reflashes could not either, so are you talking about a piggyback ECU? Like the V-branded Australian unit? Interesting . . . idea - use the reflash to control ignition and fuel, etc, and use the interceptor to add more features like a stand alone would offer?

EVOlutionary
This is what I am currently doing. Ecuflash for my 91 octane tune. Using ECU+ piggyback for knock control / logging (which it rocks at) / 100 octane tune / maf clamp / idle smoothing
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.