Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

NEW FP GREEN, setup doesn't produce expected power!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 01:50 PM
  #106  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
Originally Posted by ultimatesteve
SE is great and I have seen a ton of great tunes come out of there but you may want to take you car over to bryan@gst and see what he thinks. Not that he is a better tuner but he might have some different insight for you to start narrowing down the problem. Because there is a huge problem. You should hit those numbers with just a tune and drop in filter.
Hey Steve,

No offense taken. I actually think its a good idea to take it to another third party source as I've run out of ideas on how to fix this car.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #107  
jenx1976's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Fallon NV, Bellingham WA, Angeles City PI
Originally Posted by Srt-4 Turbo 7
A stock turboed Evo with a 10.5 hotside running meth at 30psi will make "around" 400awhp. 50awhp is a big difference!
off topic...is this on a VIII or IX turbo?
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #108  
KenMasters's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
EFix-MR------------Well put (defense) and thanks for posting curves. Your tune looks good except for #'s. I think the car might have a bit of LEMON in it. I hope everything works out for this guy.

I didn't notice cams in his list of mod's.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 03:31 PM
  #109  
EFIxMR's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 954
Likes: 3
From: retired
He is running stock cams, but for the most part with MIVEC tuning the stock 9 cam works pretty damn good.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #110  
KenMasters's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Isn't mod order cams before turbo? I should talk I bought turbo before cams to. I am a hypocrite. Looks like a good tune for what you were working with.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:28 PM
  #111  
tripperfx3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
From: North Beach, MD
Originally Posted by KenMasters
Isn't mod order cams before turbo? I should talk I bought turbo before cams to. I am a hypocrite. Looks like a good tune for what you were working with.
On an VIII yes, but the IX has a fairly beefy cam due to the MIVEC (thats my understanding) there for after tuning and such cams arent really necessary unless your going BIG numbers. They would help, but not in this instance.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #112  
PANGES's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
For those doubting Andy's tuning capabilities... When he tuned my car, I made 326whp/319wtq on 91 octane on a conservative tune with the following mods:

TBE
drop in filter
o2 hosuing
LICP
Cosworth cams
FP Green
Titanium valvesprings/retainers
ARP headstuds
720cc injectors
walbro fp

I rode in the origional poster's car today and it seemed to pull smooth, but it just didn't seem to produce any power. Dunno what's wrong with the car. =/
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 09:08 AM
  #113  
evoRS06's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
man you guys are getting robbed on the 91 octane gas. IMO your problem doesn't seem to be the tunner, the gas has a lot to do with the way your car is acting. Evos' were never ment for 91, the owners manual says it and i quote "93 octane gas is the minimum octane level sugested, anything under 93 will decrease performance." the FP green is a great turbo but your only getting about 25 hp over a stock IX turbo, you should look into meth injection to get your octane level up, or mix some tolulene in with your gas.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #114  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
There is something wonky with his car, and it ain't the gas.

Panges has put down 326 on a DD on 91 and I put down 333 on an MD on 91.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2007 | 09:26 AM
  #115  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
I have some customers putting down over 350 on 91 cali crap gas with the evogreen. It isn't that bad to deal with.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #116  
Jer.k's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Reno
Good luck Bobrick on finding out what the problem is! I was stressing when my car had excessive boost creep on the dyno that had no explanation, SE allowed me to take apart the mbc and wastegate to figure what the problem was. It never was resolved but raisng the boost on my car doesn't increase the creeping so it was tunable.


Just wanted to say how good of a tuner Andy is and there customer service is the best around from my experience
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #117  
Camphasing's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: MIAMI FL
I would definitely check your ignition maps, as that is one thing that can cause major loss of HP or a boost leak.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #118  
XtremEvo9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
trade the car in
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #119  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by EFIxMR
....Images removed to save space ....

Let me restate what I've already said, since people do not appear to be reading the entire thread.

1. The output of this car is not normal.

2. It made 271 whp since this was 50 whp below my average I turned down the boost making 250 whp so the car could be safe to drive until the car was fixed.

3. Speed Element did not install any of these parts on this vehicle

4. The average output of the 5 to 6, EVO9's and EVO8's equipped with the Green I've tuned is 320 whp.

5. Compression check was performed approx. 140-150 psi on all four cylinders. EVO9 has a different specification for compression tests than EVO 8, 140-150 psi is within factory specs for an EVO 9.

6. Car was tuned below the stock knock sensor threshold and progressively gained timing throught the power band. 270 and 250 whp was as high as the hp would go without timing retard.

7. Customer was charged $150 total for 5 hours of combined dyno time and diagnostics.

And again for those whom think I started tuning yesterday... My Tuning credits...

10 sec all motor methanol honda
Multiple 10 sec SFWD honda
10 sec stock bottom end GT35R EVO9
Multiple 11 sec EVO8's and EVO9's
Countless 300 whp 91 octane stock turbo EVO8's and EVO9's.

As for what's wrong with this car I'm not sure, but whatever is wrong with it, I feel I have more than given my customer a good deal for the services I provided vs the price I charged.

For any naysayers... I only hope that if you ever have problems on the dyno, your tuner would be as generous as I am, since normally whether or not your car makes power people expect to be paid for all their time which is $150 per hour. The dyno is an extremely expensive place to diagnose basic problems on a car. It is not my obligation to fix this car or give a discount, especially when we did not install any of the parts. I did so because I would like to believe that I am a nice guy. I am in this industry because it is my passion and not because I am looking to make a million dollars.
Hey man,
We also tune on a dynodynamics (1.00 correction factor) so I am very familiar with the numbers etc. Tune looks to be good (not saying ideal because I know you did not have time to finish it up) we also run conservative AFR to start even on 93 we start at 10.5:1. You already know this but from looking at the plots I don't see any knock (for everyone else, yes you can see knock on a dynodynamics graph, if it is enough to pull timing anyway). The curve looks a little soft at the very top, but nothing a couple degrees of timing would not cure if you had time to finish the tune, but other than that it looks like a normal IX curve just shifted down.

I would guess he slipped a tooth on the timing belt (though I would think the curve would be more shatty if so) or has some bent blades on the turbo. Most of the VIII's we have seen with a slipped tooth will drop about 40 whp. We've got a local guy that dropped about 40whp on pump due to some bent blades on his green and a swapped motor (motor let go due to meth pump failure, swapped the motor out then brought it back for a retune / checkup, now the most we can pull out of it on pump is 310 down from 350 everything has been checked and re checked).

IX's with stock turbo and cams plus turbo back and tune are normally in the 280-290 range on out DD so something is surely amiss with the mechanicals.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #120  
PANGES's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
Hey man,
We also tune on a dynodynamics (1.00 correction factor) so I am very familiar with the numbers etc.

IX's with stock turbo and cams plus turbo back and tune are normally in the 280-290 range on out DD so something is surely amiss with the mechanicals.
Yeah. Your dyno seems pretty on par with Andy's at Speed Element. When Andy first tuned my Evo IX w/ TBE, drop in, and Cosworth 272 cams, I made 313whp on his Dyno Dynamics. I was at 284-292whp previous to that with just tbe/flash.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 PM.