Philadelphia's Classiest Drunkards
No they would not. Why? 1) a pro probably has better genetics 2) better training and 3) a better understanding of the principles.
read up on Andretti. He was successful partly because of natural driving talent and years of practice, but also because he was very analytical about the sport. He often knew tricks to setting up a car that no one else was using at the time. (im sure chapman help alot here) I'm pretty that came from an understanding of how the machine worked.
Its all a mental excercise and preparation for the task. You need to practice a great deal as driving is all sensory input and motor skills. Those things come with time, but, like any activity, there is an analyticalpart to it.
You have to think about what your doing, its really what is going to separate the men from the boys. Ask any person at the top of their field what their weaknesses are. I bet you'll get a long answer! (if you can get them to be honest).
So if looking at a traction circle does nothing for you, thats ok. Doesn't mean it is a useless idea. Personally I think it can help the thought process. I did apply these things last year and they did help.
I think 2 of the first 3 F1 champions died in street crashes ... so join the club. (i.e the club is everyone)
I completely understand the beef you guys have with the theory being too simple.
Here is a good question ... As a theory becomes more general, is it more or less correct?
read up on Andretti. He was successful partly because of natural driving talent and years of practice, but also because he was very analytical about the sport. He often knew tricks to setting up a car that no one else was using at the time. (im sure chapman help alot here) I'm pretty that came from an understanding of how the machine worked.
Its all a mental excercise and preparation for the task. You need to practice a great deal as driving is all sensory input and motor skills. Those things come with time, but, like any activity, there is an analyticalpart to it.
You have to think about what your doing, its really what is going to separate the men from the boys. Ask any person at the top of their field what their weaknesses are. I bet you'll get a long answer! (if you can get them to be honest).
So if looking at a traction circle does nothing for you, thats ok. Doesn't mean it is a useless idea. Personally I think it can help the thought process. I did apply these things last year and they did help.
I think 2 of the first 3 F1 champions died in street crashes ... so join the club. (i.e the club is everyone)
I completely understand the beef you guys have with the theory being too simple.
Here is a good question ... As a theory becomes more general, is it more or less correct?
morning gents, back to the grind today. been an incredibly stressful 2 weeks, and will be till the end of the month. then stowe, jay peak, mad river and a TBD mt in 4 days. going to be epic. need a lil relaxation and mind eraser.
this whole application of theory in traction is very interesting. good read, too bad i dont have time to actually think about it and respond. have a good one guys
this whole application of theory in traction is very interesting. good read, too bad i dont have time to actually think about it and respond. have a good one guys
hmm
http://skylineownersusa.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=10566
i wonder what a name brand wheel would look like under xray.
http://skylineownersusa.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=10566
i wonder what a name brand wheel would look like under xray.
Please tell me you had an interview or was it some collabo work? Haven't seen any jobs pass my desk that I thought to pass your way...
Lastly, did you get my pm?
We are doing some collabo work. As well as exchanging some materials.. We will be doing some testing for you guys..