Notices
Project Cars / Build Threads Please post your build threads here.

Wheatley's 6262 build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #571  
GraphiteEvo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
From: Unknown
Hey Matt, just got off the phone with Fuelab and as far as building a fuel system goes I was told for 900-1000whp (~1200 crank) ethanol setup to use twin 42402 pumps in parallel with the 52902 electronic FPR. A variable speed control is built into the prodigy pump to keep things under control on the street and less volume recycled creating less heat. Hope this somewhat helps!
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #572  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
I don't have any interest in running twin pumps any longer. Going mechanical gives me more than enough fuel and reduces strain on the charging system.

If I go electric it'll be weldon. Too many horror stories with other brands losing flow and people melting engines. I can build a fuel system that provides more than enough fuel and with better reliability. It comes out to about the same price as a weldon setup and should live a lot longer. This also gives me enough flow to run whatever fuel I desire. Thanks for the input though.

Last edited by Wheatley; Mar 27, 2013 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 11:54 AM
  #573  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by antilag_200
IMO most pump failures are due to indequate plumbing of some nature. Things like cavitation, heat, improper line size prior to the pump just to name a few. The big HP folks out there tend to use small lift pumps that feed a surge tank, which then feeds one large secondary pump which then consequently feeds the engine. ( This is sooo complicated), In this scenerio typically all pumps associated are electrical.
I know you said you didn't want two pumps, but how about two pumps in one housing ..

http://www.holley.com/12-1800.asp

As with most things, it mostly boils down to cost. and simplicity of the system. I for one am a big advocate of the K.I.S.S Principle.

In regards to your statement of Low end 9 sec car and race car status .. its all relative .

I agree. I have seen the Holley pump, its really just polishing a turd for lack of a better analogy. For the base pressure I want to run, boost, and available voltage I don't see a better option. Electrical is great for big power at low volume(pressure) but for the 4 cylinder stuff that drives better on higher base pressure but needs big boost to make power the electric pumps in a solo just don't meet the demands with an acceptable margin of safety. So the option is to throw a second pump, big pumps need big power. Now you're changing to a 16v system or a bandaid boost a pump. By the time you added it all up to make an electric system work you've spent the same money(or more) and added a ton of weight. The mechanical option allows me to run any fuel I want.

I have two options. I can run a cable drive pump back at the cell. This can be costly plus a hassle to drive the cable with little available bolt on cogs. Second option is to use the Magnus bracket and cam drive it. The only problem with that is a need to prime the system. My idea is to use the stock evo pump, housing and line to prime the system after periods of being parked. Either switch or aem controlled. Probably the later during key on like a normal prime, then have it kill the pump during run/crank
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:09 PM
  #574  
GraphiteEvo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
From: Unknown
Originally Posted by Wheatley
I don't have any interest in running twin pumps any longer. Going mechanical gives me more than enough fuel and reduces strain on the charging system.

If I go electric it'll be weldon. Too many horror stories with other brands losing flow and people melting engines. I can build a fuel system that provides more than enough fuel and with better reliability. It comes out to about the same price as a weldon setup and should live a lot longer. This also gives me enough flow to run whatever fuel I desire. Thanks for the input though.
Originally Posted by Wheatley
I agree. I have seen the Holley pump, its really just polishing a turd for lack of a better analogy. For the base pressure I want to run, boost, and available voltage I don't see a better option. Electrical is great for big power at low volume(pressure) but for the 4 cylinder stuff that drives better on higher base pressure but needs big boost to make power the electric pumps in a solo just don't meet the demands with an acceptable margin of safety. So the option is to throw a second pump, big pumps need big power. Now you're changing to a 16v system or a bandaid boost a pump. By the time you added it all up to make an electric system work you've spent the same money(or more) and added a ton of weight. The mechanical option allows me to run any fuel I want.

I have two options. I can run a cable drive pump back at the cell. This can be costly plus a hassle to drive the cable with little available bolt on cogs. Second option is to use the Magnus bracket and cam drive it. The only problem with that is a need to prime the system. My idea is to use the stock evo pump, housing and line to prime the system after periods of being parked. Either switch or aem controlled. Probably the later during key on like a normal prime, then have it kill the pump during run/crank
Totally understandable and I agree with everything that was said. My only concern would be the streetability factor on a mechanical pump. Any input on it?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:11 PM
  #575  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
For reference the aeromotive mech pump which is $600 runs at 656 lph/437 gph at 100 psi fuel pressure. The magna 4303 $500 at 80 psi at 14v is I think 114gph and falling rapidly as pressure goes up. The weldon 2035 I think is at 180 and is maxed around 80psi $850 plus $150 controller. I know initial expense will be higher with mechanical but unless someone that has had experience with them gives some input it really seems like the way to go.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:13 PM
  #576  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
NASCAR and all old school cars were mechanical pumps. I dont see an issue as long as the regulator and lines are correct. I'd love some input though.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #577  
5speedwtneed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 379
Likes: 1
From: Eastern, Indiana
437 gph? Typo?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:38 PM
  #578  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
No. Rated 2700 lbs an hr at 100 psi. I believe that's what that translates into. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:38 PM
  #579  
antilag_200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 805
Likes: 4
From: Lansing
Originally Posted by Wheatley
I agree. I have two options. I can run a cable drive pump back at the cell. This can be costly plus a hassle to drive the cable with little available bolt on cogs. Second option is to use the Magnus bracket and cam drive it. The only problem with that is a need to prime the system. My idea is to use the stock evo pump, housing and line to prime the system after periods of being parked. Either switch or aem controlled. Probably the later during key on like a normal prime, then have it kill the pump during run/crank
I think marco had a gear or pulley system that he was using to drive his alternator at the rear diff. Something similiar could be used if you wanted to run a mechanical pump at the rear of the car. however there would be some fabrication with mounts etc to get it to work.

In regards to loosing prime , There might be some options to install check valves or something else so it never Loses prime during shut down. However to initially prime the system after installation, you might have to do it manually if that makes sense.

Also you could drive the mechanical pump of the crank, utililzing the ati crank pulley, so going of the cam gear isn't the only option IMO, however the cleanest I think.

At the end of the day I am thinking you are close to 1600 or more on a mechanical plus line and fittings.

The beauty of mechanical is the higher the rpm the higher the flow.. nice and simple.

all bets seem like you are going with mechanical
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 12:48 PM
  #580  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
I have an ati pulley already. I assume they already make something for the domestic guys, I don't know if that translates into a direct part for us or not. Room down there is minimal too. I think even with an anti drain back they still have to be primed if left for a few weeks. Which in all reality isn't a big deal, I could pop the line on the regulator and fill from there. I think you're about spot on price wise. Which if you really think about it its not far off from a single big electric setup ones lines are included. I think I'm liking the pump up on the cam except for the fuel lines being close to the exhaust manifold. If I could get a cable drive off the cam it'd be nice.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 01:16 PM
  #581  
GraphiteEvo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
From: Unknown
Originally Posted by Wheatley
I have an ati pulley already. I assume they already make something for the domestic guys, I don't know if that translates into a direct part for us or not. Room down there is minimal too. I think even with an anti drain back they still have to be primed if left for a few weeks. Which in all reality isn't a big deal, I could pop the line on the regulator and fill from there. I think you're about spot on price wise. Which if you really think about it its not far off from a single big electric setup ones lines are included. I think I'm liking the pump up on the cam except for the fuel lines being close to the exhaust manifold. If I could get a cable drive off the cam it'd be nice.
I'm guessing the cam driven setup won't work leaving the MIVEC cam gear then , has to have both gears non MIVEC?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2013 | 01:23 PM
  #582  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by GraphiteEvo9
I'm guessing the cam driven setup won't work leaving the MIVEC cam gear then , has to have both gears non MIVEC?
It only needs one cam,, I believe the Magnus setup runs off the exhaust cam.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 09:32 AM
  #583  
GraphiteEvo9's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
From: Unknown
I think this will work if you're concerned with prime Aeromotive Priming Kit
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2013 | 09:49 AM
  #584  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
That's cool they offer something, I can do it for free with a stock evo fuel pump though.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 03:44 PM
  #585  
Wheatley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by antilag_200
I have been using the Pro 12 cdi box from M&W for almost 6 year now. I know that for your car you might want to consider something that outputs at the 150MJ or more. The 300m coils IMO are not the greatest.( My car doesn't make as much power as yours) however I have to drop the gap down to 19 when running ethanol and low 40s of boost, even with the PRO -12 box

the pencil coils could also be another option with a different CDI box.

In regards to the pump, just buy a Weldon and be done with it.. Or for simplicity grab one of marcos Couplers to a mechanical pump
Originally Posted by antilag_200
I think marco had a gear or pulley system that he was using to drive his alternator at the rear diff. Something similiar could be used if you wanted to run a mechanical pump at the rear of the car. however there would be some fabrication with mounts etc to get it to work.

In regards to loosing prime , There might be some options to install check valves or something else so it never Loses prime during shut down. However to initially prime the system after installation, you might have to do it manually if that makes sense.

Also you could drive the mechanical pump of the crank, utililzing the ati crank pulley, so going of the cam gear isn't the only option IMO, however the cleanest I think.

At the end of the day I am thinking you are close to 1600 or more on a mechanical plus line and fittings.

The beauty of mechanical is the higher the rpm the higher the flow.. nice and simple.

all bets seem like you are going with mechanical

Going mechanical for everything needed is 2700, to go electric on a big enough weldon is 2300. Starting to think the 6466 is a bad idea lol. Either way I want to get a good single pump in the car.

In other news. The seat mounts are done, cage is really close, just a little more welding and door swingouts need to be installed. The ones I ordered won't work so we have been dealing with finding the ones that will, most are on back order. I believe that will be handled before end of this week and the cage will be certed. I'm not really sure on the time frame on the cell but its coming along nicely. Pickup date is scheduled for April 7th, hopefully I can get everything done to race it at the race in May in Norwalk.

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 AM.