Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Dyno Results - HKS 280 + Methanol

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #121  
ArchieBabes's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Ted,

How much did you pay for labor fees to install the 10.5T Housing?

Can you give me the total? Labor and the cost of the 10.5T Housing?

Do you think with the SS Autochome and O2 housing together with the 10.5 T housing will I see a significant increase in torque and hp?

Thanks man
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:22 PM
  #122  
superman105's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: California
Ted B thank you for your answer

by the way is your nozzle aim accross the IC pipe or did you aim toward the TB ??
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:28 PM
  #123  
ArchieBabes's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
superman105

It should be close to the throttle body as possible.

The nozzle should be spraying towards the inside of the Throttle Body
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #124  
superman105's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: California
Archiebabes
does it look like this

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...hlight=harness
post # 18
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:36 PM
  #125  
ArchieBabes's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Yes, that is the correct way in installing it.
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #126  
superman105's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: California
but very stange Steve told me to shoo it accross
not toward the TB

just accross the Pipe
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #127  
superman105's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: California
UPdate
Steve from SMC said that the 90 degree bent inside the pipe
is the old design the new design shoots accross the pipe
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 02:54 PM
  #128  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by ArchieBabes

How much did you pay for labor fees to install the 10.5T Housing?

Can you give me the total? Labor and the cost of the 10.5T Housing?

Do you think with the SS Autochome and O2 housing together with the 10.5 T housing will I see a significant increase in torque and hp?
I didn't install the housing only. I have the complete 10.5t turbo with titanium wheel (faster spool).

I don't recall the itemized labor charge. I had several items installed simultaneously.

The SS Autochrome manifold does appear to provide a boost in midrange torque. The aftermarket O2 housing doesn't seem to make a substantial improvement (to the best that I can tell).

My injector nozzle sprays perpendicular to the airflow path.
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #129  
ArchieBabes's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Do you mean you have the MR Turbo or the TME turbo?
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #130  
Ted B's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I have the TME. I don't think the MR turbo has the Ti wheel, just the larger hotside.
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #131  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by Ted B
I have the TME. I don't think the MR turbo has the Ti wheel, just the larger hotside.
Ted is correct. The MR turbo does not contain the titanium internals. It does have the 10.5 housing and the new designed compressor cover.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #132  
05WhiteEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, Va
Dumb question but what do you use for the alcohol?
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 12:09 AM
  #133  
DCSilvrEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 1
From: Hyattsville MD
Nice Number man congrats!
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #134  
EVOSlayer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Drews_WRX
I would go that far.........yet. Clearly the guy did NOT just swap the 280s in favor of the 272s. He added a test pipe, IC pipe, Nisei intercooler, etc. To 272 owners, I would just go out and swap for the 280s becuase of these charts.

IMO-the only real "right" way to compare 2 different sets of cams, is to only swap out the cams, and have them at the same cam timing marks....
Originally Posted by Ted B
My activities were not intended to represent an A/B cam comparison, and they should not be construed as such. I am simply preparing this platform for a large turbo.

However, he who thinks that a larger IC, upper IC pipe, and crank pulley will make significant gains in power at this level is living in a dream.
According to this test the Nisei FMIC did make some power:

http://www.socalevo.net/forums/viewt...caad9a439e6f08
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #135  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Well, after testing various cam timing settings on my HKS 280 cams, I also ended up running them at +2/0, on an AMS 3071 turbo kit.

I posted a full review here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...46#post2292646

l8r)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28 AM.