Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

TTP-Engineering Tunes the 2009 Ralliart 4b11

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #61  
BigT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 2
From: NW NJ
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
everything is help
thanks
But not really.
Cabn you make it little more understandable for me ?
Horsepower is a variable acheived with torque and RPM. This is why HP goes up when torque goes down at higher RPM's. More engine rpm and you get more HP but torque stays low. I believe that is what Steve93talon is implying.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #62  
elpoole's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: DC
There is so much BS speculation on this thread its like walking into a sweet 16 MTV party.

Dont worry, Im dropping my car off to a tuner for a month or more so they can go buck wild and figure out what some us already know to be true.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 05:19 PM
  #63  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I don't know why people are freaking out, the Ralliart was never meant to be a race car, it was designed to be a good daily driver. With a good tune, the car will be plenty quick for driving around town. Some people are acting as if this news has completely destroyed the cars viability or that there is some grand conspiracy involving Mitsubishi, Getrag, various tuners and various automotive magazines designed to unfairly bad-mouth the transmission's capabilities. I'm sorry, but we could have seen this coming from a mile away and some of us have been saying it for months now. If this news is so unsettling, you might as well go buy a 5-speed Evo. For 90% of people, this isn't a big deal and the car will still be fine for what they need.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:26 PM
  #64  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by BigT
Horsepower is a variable acheived with torque and RPM. This is why HP goes up when torque goes down at higher RPM's. More engine rpm and you get more HP but torque stays low. I believe that is what Steve93talon is implying.

"This is why HP goes up when torque goes down at higher RPM's. More engine rpm and you get more HP but torque stays low. "

so where i was wrong? Or unknowledgeable
/"Rob, I see you post all over these forums and you really have no mechanical knowledge./ with your standards?

Last edited by Robevo RS; Dec 7, 2008 at 06:28 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #65  
aestival's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Fredericton, NB, Canada
Originally Posted by ambystom01
I don't know why people are freaking out, the Ralliart was never meant to be a race car, it was designed to be a good daily driver. With a good tune, the car will be plenty quick for driving around town. Some people are acting as if this news has completely destroyed the cars viability or that there is some grand conspiracy involving Mitsubishi, Getrag, various tuners and various automotive magazines designed to unfairly bad-mouth the transmission's capabilities. I'm sorry, but we could have seen this coming from a mile away and some of us have been saying it for months now. If this news is so unsettling, you might as well go buy a 5-speed Evo. For 90% of people, this isn't a big deal and the car will still be fine for what they need.
You're right, except that the Ralliart's a great daily driver (and a marginal low-end race car, I'd wager, though I'm not basing that on personal experience).

Last edited by aestival; Dec 7, 2008 at 07:03 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #66  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Im happy with those numbers, they seem closer or better than stock Evo X numbers and that just means less money I gotta spend to have a safe and reliable everyday ride and still have fun driving it. I didnt get this car to make a race car out of it, I knew there would be limitations with the tranny, just wanted an everyday car that had some power and was fun to drive, which it is. If I want more speed, Ill get lightweight wheels and throw some carbon fiber parts on and get some racing seats.

When is this released, Im glad Im only an hour drive from Orlando to get it tuned.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 05:39 AM
  #67  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by angryGTS
Im happy with those numbers, they seem closer or better than stock Evo X numbers and that just means less money I gotta spend to have a safe and reliable everyday ride and still have fun driving it. I didnt get this car to make a race car out of it, I knew there would be limitations with the tranny, just wanted an everyday car that had some power and was fun to drive, which it is. If I want more speed, Ill get lightweight wheels and throw some carbon fiber parts on and get some racing seats.

When is this released, Im glad Im only an hour drive from Orlando to get it tuned.
so you are the perfect example, who got a right idea about the RA.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #68  
jRox's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by angryGTS
Im happy with those numbers, they seem closer or better than stock Evo X numbers and that just means less money I gotta spend to have a safe and reliable everyday ride and still have fun driving it. I didnt get this car to make a race car out of it, I knew there would be limitations with the tranny, just wanted an everyday car that had some power and was fun to drive, which it is. If I want more speed, Ill get lightweight wheels and throw some carbon fiber parts on and get some racing seats.

When is this released, Im glad Im only an hour drive from Orlando to get it tuned.
high 5. Same reason I bought mine.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:15 AM
  #69  
Bom's Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Jersey
Originally Posted by angryGTS
Im happy with those numbers, they seem closer or better than stock Evo X numbers and that just means less money I gotta spend to have a safe and reliable everyday ride and still have fun driving it. I didnt get this car to make a race car out of it, I knew there would be limitations with the tranny, just wanted an everyday car that had some power and was fun to drive, which it is. If I want more speed, Ill get lightweight wheels and throw some carbon fiber parts on and get some racing seats.

When is this released, Im glad Im only an hour drive from Orlando to get it tuned.
I love the results too. I'm glad that theres a restriction in power. If I have unlimited potential like in the other car i'd go broke.
If I had another manual EVO i'd want make 500 hp in it just because you can.
So now with SST i'm stuck with a low 300hp.

Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #70  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
whats the downfallof this z-chip? engine wear..anything?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #71  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by IdriveRA
whats the downfallof this z-chip? engine wear..anything?
There shouldnt be, all it really does is lean it out since its running pretty rich from the factory, also we should see better gas mileage as well.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #72  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by Bom's Evo
I love the results too. I'm glad that theres a restriction in power. If I have unlimited potential like in the other car i'd go broke.
If I had another manual EVO i'd want make 500 hp in it just because you can.
So now with SST i'm stuck with a low 300hp.

ya, should still be fun to drive though, damn its already fun stock, of course not as much fun as a heavily modded Evo, but we will still have a reliable fun everyday car, Ill just use the other car as a weekender/track monster.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #73  
jRox's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
From: Union, NJ
Originally Posted by angryGTS
There shouldnt be, all it really does is lean it out since its running pretty rich from the factory, also we should see better gas mileage as well.
i hope so, cause my first fill up mpg was uuuuuuuugly
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 04:40 AM
  #74  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by jRox
i hope so, cause my first fill up mpg was uuuuuuuugly
Really? Mine hasnt been too bad with mixed driving on highway and around the city and getting on it every now and then. Not too bad of a difference than with the GTS, should get even better once its broke in.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:21 AM
  #75  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
my mpg is ok.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28 PM.