Notices
09+ Lancer Ralliart General Discuss any generalized technical factory turbocharged Ralliart related topics that may not fit into the other forums.

TTP-Engineering Tunes the 2009 Ralliart 4b11

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #211  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by ambystom01
The interior sucks but the rest is pretty solid. I've heard that Chevrolet tested the launch control 400 times to make sure the transmission can hold up.
but where do you spend most of your time? Inside the car right? To me the interior matters more than the exterior.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #212  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by ambystom01
All of the money went into the drivetrain, it's like the older Evos and the STI.
but at least they actually spent SOME money on the other features of the Evo or STi
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #213  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
If the car is genuinely fun to drive, you won't notice the interior. I vastly prefer a fast car with a bad interior than a slow car with a nice interior.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #214  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by angryGTS
but at least they actually spent SOME money on the other features of the Evo or STi
Keyword, some. Remember, the old Evo used to have an interior identical to the OZ Rally but with Recaro seats and a Momo steering wheel. The radio was the same, the dash was the same, the console was the same. The OZ Rally even had cruise control which the Evo didn't.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #215  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Ya but none of these cars are exactly slow
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #216  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Keyword, some. Remember, the old Evo used to have an interior identical to the OZ Rally but with Recaro seats and a Momo steering wheel. The radio was the same, the dash was the same, the console was the same. The OZ Rally even had cruise control which the Evo didn't.
Lol thats why I capped the word some. But I was refering to exterior same thing there though Mitsu paint kinda sucked.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #217  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by angryGTS
Ya but none of these cars are exactly slow
True again, but the SS is absolutely insane for the money. I'm not sure if you noticed it but there was a huge hubub in the Evo forum because the SS was as fast in the C&D Lightning Lap as the Evo MR.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #218  
35rEvo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: U.S.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
It sure would. I purposely used the TTP dyno but even then, they're hard to compare. This is what a lot of people don't seem to get.
I just ran across this thread today so bear with me. What are you saying is hard to compare? And what are you saying nobody is understanding? I'm so confused.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #219  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by 35rEvo
I just ran across this thread today so bear with me. What are you saying is hard to compare? And what are you saying nobody is understanding? I'm so confused.
I'm saying it's hard to compare the Ralliart dyno results with the Evo dyno results even if they were run on the same dyno. It is this as well as the whole purpose of a dyno that people are not understanding.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #220  
GiLizILL's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Ramstein Ab
ok i think this topic has been beat to death lol. how about we go out and actually race other cars and/or wait for the products to come out to mod/tune the car and see where it goes from there. cuz it seems like we are stuck here just debating with out finding out for ourselves. perhaps?

maybe ttp can release a vid for us of the ralliart that they have for testing.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #221  
35rEvo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: U.S.
Originally Posted by ambystom01
I'm saying it's hard to compare the Ralliart dyno results with the Evo dyno results even if they were run on the same dyno. It is this as well as the whole purpose of a dyno that people are not understanding.
Huh? I'm still confused. Hard to compare the ralliart dyno results to the evo dyno results? Wha....?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #222  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
If we could dyno the Ralliart along with the Evo, it'd be very helpful.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:01 PM
  #223  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by 35rEvo
Huh? I'm still confused. Hard to compare the ralliart dyno results to the evo dyno results? Wha....?
How do you compare two separate dyno results?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:02 PM
  #224  
angryGTS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Fl
Originally Posted by ambystom01
True again, but the SS is absolutely insane for the money. I'm not sure if you noticed it but there was a huge hubub in the Evo forum because the SS was as fast in the C&D Lightning Lap as the Evo MR.
Not bad for a FWD econocar, that means it beat out some other stuff, the SS is indeed a step in the right direction but GM still needs to do a hell of a lot more to push their cars.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #225  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by angryGTS
Not bad for a FWD econocar, that means it beat out some other stuff, the SS is indeed a step in the right direction but GM still needs to do a hell of a lot more to push their cars.
Agreed, they only make two cars that I like right now (Cobalt SS and the Corvette).
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:50 PM.