TTP-Engineering Tunes the 2009 Ralliart 4b11
TTP's results are in this thread. XS Engineering had the first one (dyno showing 222 whp for the RA) that was heavily disputed much in the same way TTP's results are. A third was posted a few weeks ago and is somewhere in this forum but I dont remember the guy's name.
What I've been saying is that if you compare the base dyno for the X GSR to the base dyno for the Ralliart, something doesn't make sense. The Ralliart is listed as a 237 HP and 253 ft-lbs of torque car by Mitsubishi, yet it makes 220 WHP and 242 WTQ. The X GSR makes 252 WHP and 256 WTQ while being a claimed 291 HP and 300 ft-lbs of torque car. Look at the torque numbers, they differ by only 14 yet if you look at the claimed numbers, they differ by 47. This has lead to people claiming the car is underrated but this makes no sense either. How can a car that has almost Evo power levels (to the wheels nonetheless) produce performance numbers that aren't even close? Clearly the dynos are not very comparable.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
You can say it as often as you like, until a "real" dyno chart ifor the RA is posted that shows otherwise there's nothing to dispute. You can't use a bunch of EVO dynos as your method of proving the RA dyno results are all inaccurate. Like I said before, 3 tuners have posted dynos showing right around ~220 whp for the RA. Until an RA dyno is provided that shows otherwise there's nothing to go on in this thread.
I used TTP's own Evo dyno as a comparison to show that the dyno reads abnormally high (thus negating the idea that the Ralliart is underrated).
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98of6GaH1dk
OH NO AMBY THE WRX LOST TO THE RALLIART IN THIS ONE. You should really just stop taking yourself so seriously, and let people who like the Ralliart talk about the Ralliart. It may not be the very best car out there, but it is in its first year of production and it still does what 90% of people on here want it to be. A fun daily driver.
evo X SST
201 whp and 217 wtq
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=362767
buschur according to this
EVo X 220 whp
http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7748
AMS dyno jet/no mustang dyno !/
Evo X
236 whp
236 whp and 256 wtq
http://www.importtuner.com/powerpage...nce/index.html
http://www.lancerregister.com/showth...hreadid=188311
and an other evo TTP 248 whp.
Evo X
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcVDQ_NQulc
the RA is a monster against all odds for sure. Like small turbo, smaller IC set up, Lot less Boost etc.
ALso on the side note the Dyno jet is put more numbers down then the Mustang. So that is why they call it a heart braker./mustang/
Not to mention the TTP if i'm right in the warmer side and more humid in the us then some above , like AMS. That is another big difference on numbers.
let me point out something about dyno numbers.
Most people who actually get the point where he or she go for dyno tune, the car is modified.
Now when you modify the car you need performance, i think that is what we can agree on. How do you choose the Tuner? Most people by numbers, right?
SO here we go...
Now you go the tuner , tunes your car, and you got your numbers!!!! You are just as happy when you get a girl number , right? Even happier sometimes.
SO what a heck you talk about it, you might even go to the track.
There you talk even more,since you are surrounded by car nuts
Line up, happy smile on your face, you know you will be better since you got higher numbers etc. No way that guy will beat you with less numbers... Got the feeling?
Green light..........
all hell break loose , you got raped.
How? How? Why? WHY?
you want to know the truth? The numbers on dyno is not as important then you 1/4 mile time. And to make this argument short, you might have a same number or even more if your car not as strong as you opponent. Because one tuner dyno reads higher then other.
MANY times i find this proven sadly.
And because of many new guys here,i would like to point out this fact. I dont really like disappointed people , coming back like Mitsu sucks.
Rob.
Most people who actually get the point where he or she go for dyno tune, the car is modified.
Now when you modify the car you need performance, i think that is what we can agree on. How do you choose the Tuner? Most people by numbers, right?
SO here we go...
Now you go the tuner , tunes your car, and you got your numbers!!!! You are just as happy when you get a girl number , right? Even happier sometimes.
SO what a heck you talk about it, you might even go to the track.
There you talk even more,since you are surrounded by car nuts
Line up, happy smile on your face, you know you will be better since you got higher numbers etc. No way that guy will beat you with less numbers... Got the feeling?
Green light..........
all hell break loose , you got raped.
How? How? Why? WHY?
you want to know the truth? The numbers on dyno is not as important then you 1/4 mile time. And to make this argument short, you might have a same number or even more if your car not as strong as you opponent. Because one tuner dyno reads higher then other.
MANY times i find this proven sadly.

And because of many new guys here,i would like to point out this fact. I dont really like disappointed people , coming back like Mitsu sucks.
Rob.
Or you cant drive. Its not like the RA is getting spanked in the comparison tests any way, a lousy .3 of a second to 60 compared to the fugly WRX, whats that a not even a nose(you get a regular driver in the WRX lets face it race car drivers aint gonna drive that car the RA will beat it), I bet some wider tires would close that gap, the biggest thing thats holding the RA from getting past the compeitors is the weight and some other minor things like tire/wheel combo. I think it does rather well against its target competitor the WRX they are virtually identical for real world driving which matters the most anyway. The problem with these comparisons anyway(what I think) the testers thought the RA was gonna be just like the Evo so they are subjective especially in the Road and Track comparison, the real world driving isnt as bad as they make it out to be it never takes that long to pass someone, usually I like Road and Track but they FU**** that comparison.
Or you cant drive. Its not like the RA is getting spanked in the comparison tests any way, a lousy .3 of a second to 60 compared to the fugly WRX, whats that a not even a nose(you get a regular driver in the WRX lets face it race car drivers aint gonna drive that car the RA will beat it), I bet some wider tires would close that gap, the biggest thing thats holding the RA from getting past the compeitors is the weight and some other minor things like tire/wheel combo. I think it does rather well against its target competitor the WRX they are virtually identical for real world driving which matters the most anyway. The problem with these comparisons anyway(what I think) the testers thought the RA was gonna be just like the Evo so they are subjective especially in the Road and Track comparison, the real world driving isnt as bad as they make it out to be it never takes that long to pass someone, usually I like Road and Track but they FU**** that comparison.

You can listen and understand it or you can start argue:
oh he got better tires etc..
If you want to understand the point, you will. If you dont , you might will find out a hard way.
Wont matter for me.

Cheers Rob






