how-to: ECU-based direct boost control
Did you pressure test? Did you find and fix your leaks? BTW the stock turbo will have taper. The best way I have seen to eliminate taper is an O2 dump. My car is tuned for 24 psi and I taper to 22 psi by 8k rpm. But I have a built head which contributes to taper. Despite my taper, my airflow increases all the way to redline. My point is that boost is not what makes power, airflow is what makes power. As long as airflow increases, you are good.
Is your local atmospheric pressure really 13.4 psi!??? If not, your BASE BOOST #1 table is gonna be off.

Usually with a boost leak I would suspect higher load values than he is getting,hmm.
My guess is the boost pill thingy isn't enough. GM BCS can't be beat.
If you are leaking out the valve cover vent, then replace your PCV valve. Under boost pressures, the PCV should be shut closed. The extra port on the Greddy BOV shouldn't leak. Your diaphragm has a tear in it. Airflow is logged via 2-byte airflow data - seach the ECUFlash forum.
If you are leaking out the valve cover vent, then replace your PCV valve. Under boost pressures, the PCV should be shut closed. The extra port on the Greddy BOV shouldn't leak. Your diaphragm has a tear in it. Airflow is logged via 2-byte airflow data - seach the ECUFlash forum.
- past the piston rings
- past the valve guides
- PCV valve not fully closing
The best way to combat the first two on the list is to make sure the engine is warmed up to normal operating temp before doing your boost leak test and to put your #1 cylinder at TDC.
If the BOV is leaking, the BOV is probably being forced open while boosting, creating your leak. At your boost levels I'm pretty sure you can use a stock MR BOV.
If the BOV is leaking, the BOV is probably being forced open while boosting, creating your leak. At your boost levels I'm pretty sure you can use a stock MR BOV.
Thanks all for the help so far. I've been tempted to just scrap the whole ECU boost control idea and install my MBC, but I'm giving up yet!
#1 cylinder at TDC makes no difference for pressure testing since if 2 of the cylinders are closed, the other 2 cylinders are open. Leakage past ring seals is a very very slow leak (unless your motor is shot and has no compression).
If you REALLY want to take advantage of the ECU controlled boost, step up to a reputable 3 port BCS and you'll be much happier overall.
I was hoping that I could stick with the OEM BCS based on the fact that I'm only aiming for 24 PSI on 91. I suppose it could be a good investment though... what's the cheapest source of these?
Having the engine at TDC ensures that either the INTAKE or EXHAUST valves are as close to being closed as possible to minimize the air path towards the exhaust system. And a cold engine WILL have significant blow-by past the rings. I've done hundereds of boost leak tests and trust me, have the engine warm. WHy chase phantom 'hisses' when u don't have to? Plus, I prefer to not hear my compressor turn on twice as often as it needs to when searching for leaks. Every bit helps.
Since I didn't have a whole lot of time yesterday to experiment, I just simply replaced the GReddy BOV with my 1G as suggested. Here is the result!

I'll post my log up here in a bit - finally I'm getting somewhere! This weekend I'll look into replacing my PCV valve and see if that helps even further. Thanks all for the help! I actually hit my boost-load limit, so I now it's time to tweak
EDIT: Added Datalog
Could someone help explain to me why my WGDC Correction falls off like? I was under the impression that WGDCCorr was only affected by the BEC table, which I currently have zeroed out. Am I missing something?

I'll post my log up here in a bit - finally I'm getting somewhere! This weekend I'll look into replacing my PCV valve and see if that helps even further. Thanks all for the help! I actually hit my boost-load limit, so I now it's time to tweak

EDIT: Added Datalog
Could someone help explain to me why my WGDC Correction falls off like? I was under the impression that WGDCCorr was only affected by the BEC table, which I currently have zeroed out. Am I missing something?
Last edited by Z_Lancer_Man; Sep 3, 2009 at 09:28 AM. Reason: Added datalog
Not sure but I noticed your scaling only goes to 7000 RPM, same place that the WGDC correction falls off. Plus, you have the % over 100%. I highly doubt that either should be an issue but its the first thing I noticed. Not sure why its correcting if the table is zero'd out.


