Ok guys, I think I fixed everything....I THINK,lol. Try re-downloading it and let me know.

If the Dyno Correction for ESP is .955, you have the most current version.

For you guys using the metric values, be sure you switch it over to metric FIRST, then go and adjust all of the settings on the dyno graph....especially the weather corrections if you have it enabled. Otherwise the Imperial U.S. weights/temps will make your #'s WAYYY off lol.


EDIT:

Also, if you guys are comparing a log from a dyno session at you used a load bearing dyno (Mustang, Dyno Dynamics,etc...) you MUST enter the vehicle weight used by the dyno, not the actual weight of the car. Use the actual weight when comparing street pulls though.

 

jamie, 5.4 Max RPM trim for the comparison pull is set to 7900 rpm but that is not in the drop down and the drop down only includes rpm values up to 7450. Only issue i have found

Great work as always.

 

It uses the last selected value until the user changes it. Generally the first thing I do when entering a new datalog is set it to the highest RPM in the drop-down list and then trim it down if necessary. I can't figure out how to have it automatically enter in the highest RPM value when a new log is pasted.....yet.

Also, if anyone wants to add their results to their sig's, use the EVO-M Comparator numbers. Thats in the middle of MD's and DJ's. That way we can all measure dick sizes by the same ruler,lol.

 

It won't let me enter or clear datalog info due to the sheet being protected.

 

hmm, let me take a look at the last revision I posted. I'll let you know when its fixed.

 

Fixed, re-download it and let me know.

 

Jamie, your boss must be hating you

Keep up the amazing work though

 

good stuff Jamie and thanks for considering my suggestions, never expected you to change anything, just throwing it out there ya know

I'm running Excel 2003 FYI

 

Hey, its not just for me...its for my 'peeps' lol. Thank you kindly for taking the time to think of ways I could improve it for the community! A good businessman listens to the end-users, how else can it be worth a small donation right? *that was a hint guys! lol* Exceeded 100 hours on this project as of this weekend, thats over $2000 invested at my pay scale.

 

jamie, look for something from me later this week

 

Working great, thanks...

 

Awesome, thanks man. As long as it doesn't involve you, a thong and baby oil...I'm happy lol.

 

back to the drawing board....

 

Jamie ran a log through this a minute ago of Kevin@MellonTuning and with the EVOM setting it was very similar to DLL, slightly more HP and slightly less torque...very cool.

 

AWESOME! Its probably because both programs use a slightly different way of calculating the smoothing. The more you smooth it, the more HP goes up and TQ goes does usually. Its just a by-product of the math but its close enough for me to be happy with this revision!

Thanks to everyone for their input and help.