i mean the resolution of the ipw val available in the mut table.

 

I got it working on a totally different computer. Works like a champ. Thanks so much

 

Glad I could help, and blessed that we have someone as awesome as Tephra to help us out with stuff like this!

 

Amen brother

 

interesting the FIC 2150 on my car seem to work fine with my 9694011 USDM 2005 EVO 8 v2 ROM and Kevin's 88590715 USDM 2006 EVO 9 v7 ROM. Maybe it could have better trims but at least we're idling at the ideal AFR

However, Gary's and a customers are idling at 11.4 AFR no matter what. Have the settings been discovered for these?

Gary JDM EVO 7 90550001
Customer JDM EVO 8 96260009

any help would be appreciated, Thanks

 

I spose I could look it up..

btw I just finished V7 for 90550001 - doeseth youth wanteth?

 

thanks bud, we may be game to try the v7 flavor as well but want to focus on the v5 for now since it's all setup and ready to go. chris at mellontuning.com

 

hey tephra, and luck with these:

Gary JDM EVO 7 90550001
Customer JDM EVO 8 96260009

I tried v7 a while back and idled at 11.4 afr so i sent back to my trusty v2 96940011 instead. I may adopt v7 again if that one has been sorted out too. 96530706

 

Spend some time with the bastard AUDM V7 rom and get to know it, hell even let it **** your sister, it will do good things for you

 

lol, that's kinky! which ROM in particular are you referring to? I tried one awhile back and didn't have luck as I mentioned before, that's what's kept me from going to SD on the stock ECU. Certainly I'd be interested in trying another v7 ROM and sending Tephra some cash if it worked correctly.

 

That is the 96530706... I have no problems with mine...PM me and lwt me know what problems you ran into...

 

I updated post #1 with my XML's so far

can someone test 90550001 please?

 

can someone verify with evoscan that the minimumIPW for 90550011 is 2.560ms

thats without the patch of course...

 

er no Tephra, I believe it is at 0x 1503 (or 0x1502 if you want to use uint16) and the value stock is 0x05. The scaling is T*0.256 giving 1.28mS.

What address were you using?

 

1502.. uint16

the stock value IS 0x05, however the formula isn't *.256..

its SHLL8, SHLR2

5 * 256 / 4 = 320

OHHHH I see, they changed the *8 to *4
320 * 4 / 1000 = 1.28ms

ok fine.. its all good