MAP EF-series Turbochargers results thread
haha...getting more an more ef power out there! i just ordered an ef2 and now i hope to pick up a nice map header like yours! is the ported stock
only good up to 400-450? since the ef2 has good spooling, should i pick a full header that sacrafies a bit spooling but makes more on the top end, guys?
only good up to 400-450? since the ef2 has good spooling, should i pick a full header that sacrafies a bit spooling but makes more on the top end, guys?
that's up guys. Well many of you may have seen my results thread and have a little history of my setup. MAP is currently building my 2.3 and I have decided to give the ef4 a shot. Coming from a ported BBK full I am I bit concerned about the lag of the ef4 but the top end should be a nice improvement over BBK full. Look for the dyno sheets in the coming weeks!
I plan to have my car tuned by Evan as well when I take my leave from Afghanistan in March. This is very promising as we have similar set ups minus a couple of things. This also goes to show the level of customer service there as that drive from Las Cruces is no joke in the desert. 
haha...getting more an more ef power out there! i just ordered an ef2 and now i hope to pick up a nice map header like yours! is the ported stock
only good up to 400-450? since the ef2 has good spooling, should i pick a full header that sacrafies a bit spooling but makes more on the top end, guys?
only good up to 400-450? since the ef2 has good spooling, should i pick a full header that sacrafies a bit spooling but makes more on the top end, guys?
Thanks for the tips. If i do want to go for a mani, what do you think of the MAP short runner mani? With a MAP mani, i'll have a complete MAP turbo system: header, turbo, dump and dp 

Ported stock works at many power levels ive made 527 on the stock block with it, and plan to crack 600 with it this summer, I dought you will gain a ton with the manifold but they sure are pretty, make your evo sound cool, and if your ever going to change it now is the time.
IIRC, you already have the PPI extreme ported/coated exhaust manifold. If you do anything, get the MAP short-runner since it's a nice balance between response and flow; the long-runner may be a tad overkill for the EF2 since it's designed as a top-end manifold while the EF2 is not a top-end turbo, rather a more balanced and responsive turbo.
IIRC, you already have the PPI extreme ported/coated exhaust manifold. If you do anything, get the MAP short-runner since it's a nice balance between response and flow; the long-runner may be a tad overkill for the EF2 since it's designed as a top-end manifold while the EF2 is not a top-end turbo, rather a more balanced and responsive turbo.
any link to the map's result? short runner > ported stock?
Why even waste the money by spending it on another exhaust manifold as the ported stocker should be plenty with the EF2 turbo? PPI does great work and since you already have it, why not just see where you are after your build is complete before you identify any flaws in the exhaust manifold you already have. I do know that MAP did some tests on their short runner and long runner exhaust manifolds in comparison to the unported and ported stocker that had some nice results.
This thread has not had any activity lately. Are there no more EF turbos floating around? I have to tip my hat to MAPerformance family for helping me through the process to step up to the EF4. Thanks fellahs.
Ok I just whanted to update I'm going back to Cali shi*y 91 octain this upcoming fri 3rd I was running out of fuel at 424 on a mustang dyno @30psi and it starts to cut out on me at about 6k in 4th really annoying so can't afford to get an inline 255 and bigger injectors for now so getin it tuned on 91 and staying there for about a half a year till I could save some money and upgrade my fuel system and maybe get my manifolds and tb ported at the same time also whant to use the car for snow boarding and there is no e85 in Tahoe and don't want to bother worrying about running out of gas so can't wait to see what it will do on 91 @ 25 psi but eventually I will push it all the way on e85
Ok I just wanted to update I'm going back to Cali shi*y 91 octain this upcoming fri 3rd.
I was running out of fuel at 424 on a mustang dyno @30psi and it starts to cut out on me at about 6k in 4th, really annoying, And i can't afford to get an inline 255 and bigger injectors for now so I'm getting it tuned on 91 and staying there for about a half a year until I could save some money and upgrade my fuel system and maybe get my manifolds and tb ported at the same time.
Also i want to use the car for snow boarding and there is no e85 in Tahoe and don't want to bother worrying about running out of gas so can't wait to see what it will do on 91 @ 25 psi but eventually I will push it all the way on e85
I was running out of fuel at 424 on a mustang dyno @30psi and it starts to cut out on me at about 6k in 4th, really annoying, And i can't afford to get an inline 255 and bigger injectors for now so I'm getting it tuned on 91 and staying there for about a half a year until I could save some money and upgrade my fuel system and maybe get my manifolds and tb ported at the same time.
Also i want to use the car for snow boarding and there is no e85 in Tahoe and don't want to bother worrying about running out of gas so can't wait to see what it will do on 91 @ 25 psi but eventually I will push it all the way on e85
Another guy down here just got tuned on his EF2X and put down respectable numbers on ****ty Arkansas 91-octane, I'll let him be the one to elaborate on that though. Then another local has his new EF2X sitting on his desk at work just waiting for the chance to install it. Let's see, what else do I know...oh, my buddy will be upgrading his 2.3L IX from the EF3 to the EF4 sometime this spring.
Last edited by Kracka; Jan 29, 2012 at 11:13 AM.



