Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP EF-series Turbochargers results thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2014 | 09:49 PM
  #1441  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Uscbryan
Thanks. I ended up ordering the EF3 and AMS DP today and they told me I don't need a BOV at this point.

Sorry AS = Anti Surge
From what I understand you don't need an anti surge housing until you bump up to a large-displacement engine. I don't know, other than that. I keep things on my car OEM looking and super simple, so I've never really looked into them.
Reply
Old May 13, 2014 | 10:26 PM
  #1442  
Uscbryan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, Ca
Yea I was up until about 2 am researching BOV and DV had it down to a synapse DV and then Drew at Map said stock is fine. Lol But it did save me a few hundred. Ordered the EF3 with all the options except anti surge. Now ten long wait until it comes in.


Originally Posted by kaj
From what I understand you don't need an anti surge housing until you bump up to a large-displacement engine. I don't know, other than that. I keep things on my car OEM looking and super simple, so I've never really looked into them.
Reply
Old May 14, 2014 | 08:54 AM
  #1443  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Uscbryan
Yea I was up until about 2 am researching BOV and DV had it down to a synapse DV and then Drew at Map said stock is fine. Lol But it did save me a few hundred. Ordered the EF3 with all the options except anti surge. Now ten long wait until it comes in.
My experience with the stock DV is somewhat different. It would hold 25 psi no problem during a boost leak test, but when I was running 25-27 psi peak boost, no matter what I did to my tune, I couldn't stop AFRs from going rich during spool. I eventually installed an aftermarket DV, and the rich dip disappeared. I can't explain why it mattered, but it was the only change that I made at the time.
Reply
Old May 14, 2014 | 08:56 AM
  #1444  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
The stockers are designed to leak so people don't make so much boost. (sorta)

I agree with Mr Fred though, I have had lots of boost leak issues on a stock non modified DV. I crushed my stock one back in the day which helped a lot but since have gotten a proper aftermarket one that doesn't leak.
Reply
Old May 14, 2014 | 09:45 AM
  #1445  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Weird. I have a crushed, OEM diverter and have no issues. The tune is spot on. This is at 25psi on an ef2.5. I admit I have not tried any more boost, though, as I am on 91oct.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #1446  
rs03evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: SACRAMENTO, CA
2.4/EF4 on a dynojet

today I made 420/415 on 91 pump @ 30ish lbs. in 100 degree weather.. it was running super rich so still need to do some more tuning ill be back with more updates...
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 10:10 AM
  #1447  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
I have a question for anyone with experience with the EF 2.5 turbo. A ring land in my motor broke a couple months back, and I shipped the car off to KevinD for repairs. Ended up doing an EVOD stage 1 rebuild good for 600whp. I had them pull the turbo, and apparently the previous owner had been running the car with no air filter, or chewing on the rotor. The car was modded before the ring land went, but it never made the power it should have, or spooled the way it should have, and now I know why.

Anyway, I decided to upgrade the turbo to the EF 2.5. My question is what kind of power should I be expecting with the new setup? Mods listed below:

Megan O2 housing
Megan 3" DP
HKS carbon Ti catback
Ported stock turbo manifold
Mil.spec 3" 100 cell cat
ETS intake
ETS upper and lower IC piping
ETC 3" wide tank EVO IX intercooler
Walbro 255
Sparktech COP
FIC 780 injectors
Grimspeed 3 port
Forge WGA
Stock IX BOV
And the motor is fully built as I said earlier.

The car also has a TRE 6 speed, Fortune Auto 500 coilovers 10k/12k setup/corner balanced by Kevin.

Last edited by ODUB; May 17, 2014 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 11:59 AM
  #1448  
evoforstevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
The injectors look to be your limiting factor. On 93, I'd say 420 on a dynojet is not out of reach.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 02:14 PM
  #1449  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by evoforstevo
The injectors look to be your limiting factor. On 93, I'd say 420 on a dynojet is not out of reach.
That's it? I was figuring a bit more than that. I did think about the injectors, but I didn't think they'd be that much of a hindrance.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 03:13 PM
  #1450  
Raptord's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 20
From: Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
I haven't checked IDC's with my 780cc injectors, however I'm pretty confident you can go higher than 420 DJ on those injectors ODUB.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 09:23 PM
  #1451  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
my rule of thumb for estimated horsepower is your injector cc/2. I make it a bit less for safety. for example, I am at 390whp on 1050s but limited to crappy 91oct. I have more injector left and can check the IDC, if you're curious.

Using that math, 780/2 = 390whp safely. If you're gas is better than CA 91, then you should make a bit more.

Last edited by kaj; May 17, 2014 at 09:26 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 11:13 PM
  #1452  
wiseguy9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mrfred
My experience with the stock DV is somewhat different. It would hold 25 psi no problem during a boost leak test, but when I was running 25-27 psi peak boost, no matter what I did to my tune, I couldn't stop AFRs from going rich during spool. I eventually installed an aftermarket DV, and the rich dip disappeared. I can't explain why it mattered, but it was the only change that I made at the time.
^^^Difference probably due to temperature of the bov especially the spring when test is conducted vs. when the bov is exposed to the heat from the engine. I would imagine if you did a boost leak test with the stock bov and put a heat gun to it you would be able to make it "leak"at a lower psi than than 25 psi.
Reply
Old May 18, 2014 | 04:08 AM
  #1453  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by wiseguy9
^^^Difference probably due to temperature of the bov especially the spring when test is conducted vs. when the bov is exposed to the heat from the engine. I would imagine if you did a boost leak test with the stock bov and put a heat gun to it you would be able to make it "leak"at a lower psi than than 25 psi.
It should seal better when there's heat on it. Everything expands, and clearances get smaller, and tighter.
Reply
Old May 18, 2014 | 08:38 AM
  #1454  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by wiseguy9
^^^Difference probably due to temperature of the bov especially the spring when test is conducted vs. when the bov is exposed to the heat from the engine. I would imagine if you did a boost leak test with the stock bov and put a heat gun to it you would be able to make it "leak"at a lower psi than than 25 psi.
I suppose there could be some temperature affect, but a quick Google search reveals that Young's modulus for spring steels (and most other steels) does not vary appreciably between room temperature and 150F - maybe 2%. So its not a huge effect. I think its more that the DV was at its limit.

The interesting aspect to contemplate is how would it even cause a rich dip. Since the DV recirculates, the air should already be accounted for, and there should be no change in AFR with a leaking DV.
Reply
Old May 18, 2014 | 01:49 PM
  #1455  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,636
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by mrfred
I suppose there could be some temperature affect, but a quick Google search reveals that Young's modulus for spring steels (and most other steels) does not vary appreciably between room temperature and 150F - maybe 2%. So its not a huge effect. I think its more that the DV was at its limit.

The interesting aspect to contemplate is how would it even cause a rich dip. Since the DV recirculates, the air should already be accounted for, and there should be no change in AFR with a leaking DV.
Well....IM is still seeing less air than the MAF, so kinda makes sense.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.