Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Borgwarner Twin Scroll 7670 With Dyno Graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 02:01 PM
  #526  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Here's my path of logic.

Dave tunes the engine with the previously damaged turbcharger on the car. It's rubbing on the housing or missing parts of the turbine wheel... or the CHRA has bits of steel in it. SOMETHING is wrong with the turbocharger evident by it's complete lack of response (4th gear spool is worse than the HTA76 in 3rd gear) That's a HUGE WAIVING RED FLAG.

You get the car, run it for 2 laps... turbo eats itself. You go get a new turbo and put it on... The new turbo A) spools up much faster and therefore runs through parts of the map Dave couldn't and didn't tune...and its more efficient and has more mass flow per psi of boost since it's not damaged. This causes the AFR's to go lean... maybe not SUPER lean, but lean enough to run your EGT's through the roof for extended track sessions.

You melt everything in your combustion chamber and send it through your new turbo. New turbo gets a UFO to meet with the TiAL turbine wheel, chips off a huge section of it, causes severe imbalance and bends the shaft.

Tough part about their FMEAs is determining which came first...the engine or the turbo. Pretty easy to follow which one killed what in Leet's case though.

Looks like leet needs a new engine, new turbo, and a tuner who can check your logs and make adjustments to the tune trackside. Since you race in California... RRE or Church seem like great options.
Since you kinda covered it all I quoted you.

First I am fairly certain the video and pics Ben posted are of the first turbo that was damaged. As far as anyone knows right now the new turbo is still on the car and is in good working order. So the engine did not take out the turbo as the engine had the melt down on the new turbo that is still on the car.

Second, I am committing myself to being at his next track event, even if I have to fly to California to do it. I saw the map that was in the car, the car needs me to tune it.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #527  
leetEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 150
Likes: 7
From: AZ
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Here's my path of logic.

Dave tunes the engine with the previously damaged turbcharger on the car. It's rubbing on the housing or missing parts of the turbine wheel... or the CHRA has bits of steel in it. SOMETHING is wrong with the turbocharger evident by it's complete lack of response (4th gear spool is worse than the HTA76 in 3rd gear) That's a HUGE WAIVING RED FLAG.

You get the car, run it for 2 laps... turbo eats itself. You go get a new turbo and put it on... The new turbo A) spools up much faster and therefore runs through parts of the map Dave couldn't and didn't tune...and its more efficient and has more mass flow per psi of boost since it's not damaged. This causes the AFR's to go lean... maybe not SUPER lean, but lean enough to run your EGT's through the roof for extended track sessions.

You melt everything in your combustion chamber and send it through your new turbo. New turbo gets a UFO to meet with the TiAL turbine wheel, chips off a huge section of it, causes severe imbalance and bends the shaft.

Tough part about their FMEAs is determining which came first...the engine or the turbo. Pretty easy to follow which one killed what in Leet's case though.

Looks like leet needs a new engine, new turbo, and a tuner who can check your logs and make adjustments to the tune trackside. Since you race in California... RRE or Church seem like great options.
No idea what the "new" turbo looks like. Haven't taken it off yet. the pics are from the old original 7670.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:00 PM
  #528  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
Here's my path of logic.

Dave tunes the engine with the previously damaged turbcharger on the car. It's rubbing on the housing or missing parts of the turbine wheel... or the CHRA has bits of steel in it. SOMETHING is wrong with the turbocharger evident by it's complete lack of response (4th gear spool is worse than the HTA76 in 3rd gear) That's a HUGE WAIVING RED FLAG.

You get the car, run it for 2 laps... turbo eats itself. You go get a new turbo and put it on... The new turbo A) spools up much faster and therefore runs through parts of the map Dave couldn't and didn't tune...and its more efficient and has more mass flow per psi of boost since it's not damaged. This causes the AFR's to go lean... maybe not SUPER lean, but lean enough to run your EGT's through the roof for extended track sessions.

You melt everything in your combustion chamber and send it through your new turbo. New turbo gets a UFO to meet with the TiAL turbine wheel, chips off a huge section of it, causes severe imbalance and bends the shaft.

Tough part about their FMEAs is determining which came first...the engine or the turbo. Pretty easy to follow which one killed what in Leet's case though.

Looks like leet needs a new engine, new turbo, and a tuner who can check your logs and make adjustments to the tune trackside. Since you race in California... RRE or Church seem like great options.
Only problem with your logic is you missing the post where David fully inspected the turbo before installing on his newly built master piece engine. I am 100% sure they didnt miss the obvious. If the wheels where hitting the housing and they missed it that would be a pretty huge mistake. Once turbine blades hit housing the turbo would be toast. It wouldnt have lasted one dyno pull with a bent turbine. Especially when we are talking about TIAL wheel. very brittle when hot and stupid brittle when cold. Facts are pretty clear from where I am sitting. The first turbo failed at the track, not at Davids dyno.

It wouldn't surprise me if the chewed up turbine wheel left pieces in the intake track. Causing maybe a sticking valve or the like, taking out the engine. But an even better guess is more simple than that. like something failing in the fuel system causing car to go lean.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Nov 10, 2011 at 03:44 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #529  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Sorry I confused the 2nd turbo with the first. The concept stays the same.

First engine failure caused first turbo to fail.
NEW turbo causes new engine to fail.
2nd turbo condition unknown.

New combination should be... BW inspected 2nd turbo or new 3rd turbo... and new 3rd engine. Tuned on a dyno in 3rd, 4th, and 5th. Then when it goes to the track; each log should be pulled and analyzed after each session.

I'm sure Dave didn't measure radial or axial shaft play with a dial indicator...and I'm sure he didn't know what to expect anyway. Dave can't examine the inside of the CHRA.... so your visual inspection only goes so far. (not very far)

Last edited by R/TErnie; Nov 10, 2011 at 03:13 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #530  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by David Buschur
Since you kinda covered it all I quoted you.

First I am fairly certain the video and pics Ben posted are of the first turbo that was damaged. As far as anyone knows right now the new turbo is still on the car and is in good working order. So the engine did not take out the turbo as the engine had the melt down on the new turbo that is still on the car.

Second, I am committing myself to being at his next track event, even if I have to fly to California to do it. I saw the map that was in the car, the car needs me to tune it.
What we have found separates people who tune cars from the Tuners. The fact that Dave is willing to go the extra mile to provide track support to a customer speaks volumes.



Aaron
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2011 | 03:26 PM
  #531  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
What we have found separates people who tune cars from the Tuners. The fact that Dave is willing to go the extra mile to provide track support to a customer speaks volumes.



Aaron
yes. many a beers for Dave
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 12:26 PM
  #532  
7EVO7's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 1
From: EvoLand
Originally Posted by David Buschur
... I am committing myself to being at his next track event, even if I have to fly to California to do it...
Props to Dave for such customer service
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #533  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
if that was the case i dont think it would be possible to give an actual safe shaft speed as harmonics would depend on a lot of things. curious to see how this plays out.
Resonance is going to be dependent on the space between the bearings, the length of the shaft, the mass of the wheels, and the materials. These things will change slightly due to manufacturing tolerances, but the turbo is going to reach a resonant speed within a known range.

That aside, sorry to hear about yet another failure.

I'm with R/T Ernie though, you can definitely have a mildly damaged turbo that still works for a while. I had a turbo with a half broken thrust bearing. Still made reasonable levels of boost, but made all kinds of bad noises. It was perfectly fine the day before though when the damage actually happened. Friends have chipped compressor wheels and still made 800+ HP on GT42Rs. Not just little chips, 1/4" sections of blades missing... Hell, my old GT2871R ate an EGT probe and it managed to make decent power and never made a noise even with a couple chunks of turbine wheel missing and several others bent to hell.

I would bet there was damage done to the first turbo from the first engine failure and it lead to a tune that didn't work with a good turbo.

Also, the first turbo was an old unit, if I'm not mistaken. Maybe they had some tolerance issues. I've seen a compressor cover that was machined a few thousands off cost a 700HP car 80 HP. A simple compressor cover change (same type) literally picked up 80WHP and had a massive impact on the tune.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #534  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
any news on the damage to the current motor?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #535  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
Resonance is going to be dependent on the space between the bearings, the length of the shaft, the mass of the wheels, and the materials. These things will change slightly due to manufacturing tolerances, but the turbo is going to reach a resonant speed within a known range.

That aside, sorry to hear about yet another failure.

I'm with R/T Ernie though, you can definitely have a mildly damaged turbo that still works for a while. I had a turbo with a half broken thrust bearing. Still made reasonable levels of boost, but made all kinds of bad noises. It was perfectly fine the day before though when the damage actually happened. Friends have chipped compressor wheels and still made 800+ HP on GT42Rs. Not just little chips, 1/4" sections of blades missing... Hell, my old GT2871R ate an EGT probe and it managed to make decent power and never made a noise even with a couple chunks of turbine wheel missing and several others bent to hell.

I would bet there was damage done to the first turbo from the first engine failure and it lead to a tune that didn't work with a good turbo.

Also, the first turbo was an old unit, if I'm not mistaken. Maybe they had some tolerance issues. I've seen a compressor cover that was machined a few thousands off cost a 700HP car 80 HP. A simple compressor cover change (same type) literally picked up 80WHP and had a massive impact on the tune.
i had a precision journal bearing 6152s that was a huge pig out of the box, spun freely and didnt have play but it was terribly laggy and the air coming out was so hot it softened the powdercoating on the intercooler piping. blew less than 2,000 miles later. slapped a replacement on and had to totally revamp the boost control as it would spike hard to 30psi when it was tuned for 22psi.

Last edited by n2oiroc; Nov 12, 2011 at 06:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 07:28 PM
  #536  
jid2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
This is like a Shakespearean tragedy. Road Racing is not for the faint of wallet, it will find the things to break or rattle loose. Hopefully things get better, best of luck.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #537  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
No, we didn't measure anything with a dial indicator. We glanced into the turbo, checked out what it looked like, sprayed cleaner through the top and out the bottom to try to wash any possible bearing debris in the turbo out the bottom (this is what we do to all turbo's that come in with an engine with bearing problems-and it works). Could we have missed a slight wobble in the shaft? I suppose so. I think it's all pretty moot.

The car is being shipped back here, I am going to fix it all out of my pocket. We will decide what is going to happen to the turbo/turbo kit when it is here and I will tune the car again. Then when it goes to the track again I will fly/drive there to tune it at the track to make sure all is good.

I agree, something in the fuel system could have caused this, I asked Ben to check the vacuum line on the FPR and the relay/double pumper but I didn't hear anything back.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 09:20 AM
  #538  
Construct's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 161
From: Utah
Originally Posted by David Buschur
No, we didn't measure anything with a dial indicator. We glanced into the turbo, checked out what it looked like, sprayed cleaner through the top and out the bottom to try to wash any possible bearing debris in the turbo out the bottom (this is what we do to all turbo's that come in with an engine with bearing problems-and it works). Could we have missed a slight wobble in the shaft? I suppose so. I think it's all pretty moot.

The car is being shipped back here, I am going to fix it all out of my pocket. We will decide what is going to happen to the turbo/turbo kit when it is here and I will tune the car again. Then when it goes to the track again I will fly/drive there to tune it at the track to make sure all is good.

I agree, something in the fuel system could have caused this, I asked Ben to check the vacuum line on the FPR and the relay/double pumper but I didn't hear anything back.
Amazing customer service.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2011 | 10:50 PM
  #539  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by David Buschur
No, we didn't measure anything with a dial indicator. We glanced into the turbo, checked out what it looked like, sprayed cleaner through the top and out the bottom to try to wash any possible bearing debris in the turbo out the bottom (this is what we do to all turbo's that come in with an engine with bearing problems-and it works). Could we have missed a slight wobble in the shaft? I suppose so. I think it's all pretty moot.

The car is being shipped back here, I am going to fix it all out of my pocket. We will decide what is going to happen to the turbo/turbo kit when it is here and I will tune the car again. Then when it goes to the track again I will fly/drive there to tune it at the track to make sure all is good.

I agree, something in the fuel system could have caused this, I asked Ben to check the vacuum line on the FPR and the relay/double pumper but I didn't hear anything back.
Awesome to see you actually stepping up and really help him
Here's a to you
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2011 | 03:31 AM
  #540  
JARVEVO8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by David Buschur
No, we didn't measure anything with a dial indicator. We glanced into the turbo, checked out what it looked like, sprayed cleaner through the top and out the bottom to try to wash any possible bearing debris in the turbo out the bottom (this is what we do to all turbo's that come in with an engine with bearing problems-and it works). Could we have missed a slight wobble in the shaft? I suppose so. I think it's all pretty moot.

The car is being shipped back here, I am going to fix it all out of my pocket. We will decide what is going to happen to the turbo/turbo kit when it is here and I will tune the car again. Then when it goes to the track again I will fly/drive there to tune it at the track to make sure all is good.

I agree, something in the fuel system could have caused this, I asked Ben to check the vacuum line on the FPR and the relay/double pumper but I didn't hear anything back.

Adios amigo! lol! I see it coming...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:33 PM.