Stepping my IX up for 91/E85, looking for final preparation suggestions
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Fontana Sunday street legal drags? If so, count me in! The weather looks like its going to be really nice. I might be able to round up 2 other Evo owners as well. @SoSoEVO and @RussianEVO
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Fontana Sunday street legal drags? If so, count me in! The weather looks like its going to be really nice. I might be able to round up 2 other Evo owners as well. @SoSoEVO and @RussianEVO
715 N Milliken Ave, Ontario, CA 91764
Breakfast is too early for me haha. 1 year old = no sleep how it is. Making it on time to the track will be hard enough. He has doubled in size and energy since the last time you saw him. But I am 99% going to be at the track. Just have to make sure I have a baby sitter. Shouldnt be a big deal.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
Also, turns out, AFRs were in 10s on spool up and leans out to 12.7 up top. Now, car runs 11.5-11.8 with dips into 10.8 at spool up where max wtq was (3100-3800). Last night, my 71hta now spikes to 35psi and settles down to normal. So my revised tune lets turbo spike higher and run no timing until turbo settles down. And timing is about 5° less throughout (and more at spool up range). My tires no longer breaks loose in 1st gear at spool up, but it still hauls. It was fun going sideways when turbo hit, but this is more sane. Haha.
looks like some good progress.
If you don't mind me offering my .02,
You have something going on where you are going rich then lean and then ok (I don't mean too rich/lean just assuming a 11.5 target). I would try and smooth that out a bit. This might not be a tuning thing, but you should be able to see whats going on from the fuel map. If the map is pretty smooth in those areas then that would make me lean more mechanical. Then I would probably take all those 0 timing cells and make them 1 so you don't get 0101 oscillation going on.
If you don't mind me offering my .02,
You have something going on where you are going rich then lean and then ok (I don't mean too rich/lean just assuming a 11.5 target). I would try and smooth that out a bit. This might not be a tuning thing, but you should be able to see whats going on from the fuel map. If the map is pretty smooth in those areas then that would make me lean more mechanical. Then I would probably take all those 0 timing cells and make them 1 so you don't get 0101 oscillation going on.
Also, turns out, AFRs were in 10s on spool up and leans out to 12.7 up top. Now, car runs 11.5-11.8 with dips into 10.8 at spool up where max wtq was (3100-3800). Last night, my 71hta now spikes to 35psi and settles down to normal. So my revised tune lets turbo spike higher and run no timing until turbo settles down. And timing is about 5° less throughout (and more at spool up range). My tires no longer breaks loose in 1st gear at spool up, but it still hauls. It was fun going sideways when turbo hit, but this is more sane. Haha.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
looks like some good progress.
If you don't mind me offering my .02,
You have something going on where you are going rich then lean and then ok (I don't mean too rich/lean just assuming a 11.5 target). I would try and smooth that out a bit. This might not be a tuning thing, but you should be able to see whats going on from the fuel map. If the map is pretty smooth in those areas then that would make me lean more mechanical. Then I would probably take all those 0 timing cells and make them 1 so you don't get 0101 oscillation going on.
If you don't mind me offering my .02,
You have something going on where you are going rich then lean and then ok (I don't mean too rich/lean just assuming a 11.5 target). I would try and smooth that out a bit. This might not be a tuning thing, but you should be able to see whats going on from the fuel map. If the map is pretty smooth in those areas then that would make me lean more mechanical. Then I would probably take all those 0 timing cells and make them 1 so you don't get 0101 oscillation going on.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
I lost my VD graphing with my Surface Pro. I'll need to set it up on my Asus Transformer. So I have no idea what my wtq is at this time. Lol
I think timing down low looks ok. The curve really looks decent but I would like to see boost, not just load. Depending on boost, it may be happier with not getting 5* until 5k, and then slowing the ramp to 10* out to 6k, then 15* at 7, and if you revved it 8k, you could give it another 1-2 degrees from 7-8.
Also, why aren't you revving it to 7600 or 8k?
Also, why aren't you revving it to 7600 or 8k?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 197
From: California
I was doing pulls on freeway onramps. Cars in slow lanes were going 70 and I'm pulling right up to them and hitting brakes. Lol








