Judge the tune, not the messanger....
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
That's a signature file if I ever saw one 
On that note.. it's a saturday night guys. Go out and have some fun... I'm sure this thread will be here we we all get back
-shiv

On that note.. it's a saturday night guys. Go out and have some fun... I'm sure this thread will be here we we all get back
-shiv
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Just by way of reference - IF this car has a ECUTEK REFLASH - it CAN NOT be tuned by the end user - only a ECUTEK tuner is able to change the reflash
DeltaDash info
Last edited by joshd; Jan 28, 2006 at 08:28 PM.
Honestly Al, until I actually saw you state that you are a JD, I didn't believe it as I tend to hold professional school graduates to a higher standard when it comes to punctuation and grammar on the internet or otherwise. I'm obviously not a english teacher and neither did I enjoy english class nor its rules, but I do my best to try to form proper sentences and spell the best that I can. It just seems to me that as imperative that it is for a lawyer to have a firm command of language, those skills would simply diffuse into the internet vernacular as well.
Originally Posted by sandm
this namecalling between shiv and al is getting very old... would be nice to see both just accept that they are each great tuners and every once in a while have a bad tune.. it's inevidible in any kind of a "service" industry such as car tuning...
what I cannot believe is that buschur racing(dave) has decided to step into this little feud. I know that buschur and al do a lot with each other, but I cannot believe that dave would want to potentially tarnish his rep/future customer base by getting into this kindergarten fight.
just my .02
what I cannot believe is that buschur racing(dave) has decided to step into this little feud. I know that buschur and al do a lot with each other, but I cannot believe that dave would want to potentially tarnish his rep/future customer base by getting into this kindergarten fight.
just my .02
Funny thing is that what I've never seen is anybody ever come out and say "we had some problems" but we are going to fix them or "I made a mistake" and I'm going to rectify it..... I do read a lot of "it was perfect when I finished it" and "it was his fault" or "somebody must have messed with it" or "it was somebody else's fault" or "it was his sh!tty parts" or "his bad attitude". etc.
Originally Posted by silverEVO8
I think it's pretty bad about all these tuner wars.... I've never seen anything resolved in these forums yet.....
Funny thing is that what I've never seen is anybody ever come out and say "we had some problems" but we are going to fix them or "I made a mistake" and I'm going to rectify it..... I do read a lot of "it was perfect when I finished it" and "it was his fault" or "somebody must have messed with it" or "it was somebody else's fault" or "it was his sh!tty parts" or "his bad attitude". etc.
Funny thing is that what I've never seen is anybody ever come out and say "we had some problems" but we are going to fix them or "I made a mistake" and I'm going to rectify it..... I do read a lot of "it was perfect when I finished it" and "it was his fault" or "somebody must have messed with it" or "it was somebody else's fault" or "it was his sh!tty parts" or "his bad attitude". etc.

Originally Posted by A418t81
Honestly Al, until I actually saw you state that you are a JD, I didn't believe it as I tend to hold professional school graduates to a higher standard when it comes to punctuation and grammar on the internet or otherwise. I'm obviously not a english teacher and neither did I enjoy english class nor its rules, but I do my best to try to form proper sentences and spell the best that I can. It just seems to me that as imperative that it is for a lawyer to have a firm command of language, those skills would simply diffuse into the internet vernacular as well.
good writing takes a lot of time and consideration, I have prob over 14,000 posts on this forum between my old personal screen name and my business screen name - IF I drafted each one like an appeallate breif my fingers would have fallen off a long time ago
I think we are drifting
with this line of dialouge which started with one of shiv's supporters apparently insinuating that someone else was drafting my posts
Last edited by DynoFlash; Jan 28, 2006 at 08:59 PM.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
of [or perhaps "or"] just deny you even tuned it in the first place, change the subject and throw ion a few of these -
good writing takes a lot of time and consideration, I have prob over 10,000 posts on this forum between my old personal screen name and my business screen name
Kinda paints an interesting picture.. doesn't it?Oops... there goes that karma again.
shiv
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Jan 28, 2006 at 11:02 PM.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
of just deny you even tuned it in the first place, change the subject and throw ion a few of these - 

Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I agree.
I have no intention to trash Shiv's work and try and tear apart a tune he did.
I have no intention to trash Shiv's work and try and tear apart a tune he did.
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Al, it's hard for me to take this thread seriously based upon the information (or lack there of) that you and Dave provided. It is especially surreal considering the contradictory posts the owner made on the WRX forum just weeks ago. The next time you want to call anyone out, at least make an attempt to get your facts straight. I think that would save a lot of us a lot of time. That's all.
Over 1000 posts? Does that number include posts you made under other evom accounts, like "Evoitis1"? You had some interesting posts under that name
There goes that karma again.
shiv
Over 1000 posts? Does that number include posts you made under other evom accounts, like "Evoitis1"? You had some interesting posts under that name

There goes that karma again.
shiv
I DID NOT provide ANY information AT ALL, as I never saw the car in question, talked with the customer or had anything to do with the posting of this thread
I dont have any facts about your tuning or lack thereof and I do not care
I dont follow the WRX forums so I am not privy to the posting scene over there - again I have no facts about the car in question and even IF I did I would not bother to post anything about your tuning as its a subject I really could care less about
I was posting here merely to express my feelings about this subject not to comment on the quality of your work or the lack thereof
If you are interested in how many posts I have you can look here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/me...p?userid=13943
Last edited by DynoFlash; Jan 28, 2006 at 10:04 PM.
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Al, it's hard for me to take this thread seriously based upon the information (or lack there of) that you and Dave provided. It is especially surreal considering the contradictory posts the owner made on the WRX forum just weeks ago. The next time you want to call anyone out, at least make an attempt to get your facts straight. I think that would save a lot of us a lot of time. That's all.
Over 1000 posts? Does that number include posts you made under other evom accounts, like "Evoitis1"? You had some interesting posts under that name
Oops... there goes that karma again.
shiv
Over 1000 posts? Does that number include posts you made under other evom accounts, like "Evoitis1"? You had some interesting posts under that name

Oops... there goes that karma again.
shiv
It is entirely possible that he recieved a ECUTEK base flahs for Vishnu Stage II from you through the mail and is simply using the two map function which as you know merely raises and lowers the boost level when you push the defrost button with the TPS at 100%
If that were the case - then YOU was the tuner would be the one who set up the high and low boost maps for the Vishnu Stage II
The fact that he is asking for "help" to find someone to tune his ECUTEK flash does not MEAN that he was tuning it himself
I think YOU should gather the facts and ALL the facts before YOU and your crew start spreading the story line that this poor customer was doing his own "tuning" and making "contraditory" posts
I guess we all will find out the answers to all of these questions next week
Here's the funniest part of this thread:
With all the time they've spent arguing over this, they could have either:
a) fixed whatever was mechanically wrong with the car or,
b) re-tuned the car.

There must be a clause in the Evom forum guidelines specifically banning any sort of constructive action, I'm sure of it.
With all the time they've spent arguing over this, they could have either:
a) fixed whatever was mechanically wrong with the car or,
b) re-tuned the car.

There must be a clause in the Evom forum guidelines specifically banning any sort of constructive action, I'm sure of it.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
When I have access to my flashing equipment - Monday, I will post up about what rpm your rev limiter is set at. All I recall now is the confusion over which RPM you wanted. When I see the file I will know what you have now.
It's been 14 days and I still haven't heard anything about the rev limit from you, Al.
Getting put off by someone gets old after a while...



