That's low man, IDK what to tell you. Don't let WARR get you down. Your exhaust may be hindering you somewhat. As long as your downpipe is 3.0 it is fine, it may be the cat back that has some neck downs, make sure you get a true 3.0 flow.

Other then that yoru mods are fine.

 

do you know what stock evo 9 pulls on that dyno, you where using??????

 

A Dyno Jet will typically read 250/250 with an Evo IX pulling on it 100% Stock.

 

yeah that what i figured but i was really looking for an exact number on the one he used so we can get a rough image of his gains

maybe he should try different mivec maps????

 

He is making LESS whp then a IX without cams, that is the issue at hand here.

 

warr is not happy unless he complains or critisizes something or somebody so dont sweat it, the proof is in the pudding i cant even count how many posts ive seen were the cossi cams shined over gsc!!! i cant wait to get mine and retuned by ivey

 

What still people don't get is that the Cossie cams can make more power since they are more aggressive than the S1s... Cannot comparing apples to oranges... Its like comparing a 50 trim with a GT35... cannot be done...

If we were talking about cossie cams and S2s for example which have similar specs with the cossies then, yes we could say that one is better than the other...

Its been proven and discussed many times... S1s are nice and torgey, cossie cams are torguey too but they keep better power up top... I cannot understand how many times we have to say it in order for some people to understand...

As far as our friend combo is concerned, i think he should re-check his car if everything is in order and then dyno it again... Or even better go to E-town and get some really nice trap speeds...

 

i think we are saying the cossie cams are making less across the entire power band then the GSC s1 which have shown great gains in the mid range of the power band

 

Ippo, you may be right, but what have you seen that makes you believe that the Cosworth's are making less across the band?

 

I have a hard time beliving the Fujitsobu rm01a is holding back 10-15 whp let alone the 20 whp someone said. I mean come on, no catback even gives those kind of gains and to say the rm01a takes away hp is crazy.

 

see now this it getting redundant you could of seen 5 differant cars with cossie cams and another 5 cars with the S1 for you the cossie cams made more in your research and i could have seen 5 cars with cossie cams and 5 with gsc s1 and for me the S1 seem to be the better one but in this thread it seem the user didn't have as much gain as he felt that the cams has advertised so is his opinion on the cams going to be i good one probally not and he running the cams soooooo im just telling from my opinion of the threads that has been posted im not trying to make a statement

 

I have not seen conclusive evidence that the cams (Cos. or GSC) will make a big difference on a 9 (with stock turbo). That tells me that the factory probably has a really nicely defined stock setup with the cams and turbo, and the big gains will be made from: (1) raising boost, (2) free flowing exhaust (TBE), (3) Meth / Alk, (4) O2 housing and ported exhaust manifold, and (5) a nice tune.

All the additional goodies (IMHO): FMIC, LICP, and Cams will help pull out a few more ponies, but likely will not yield huge benefits on the stock turbo. That said, once the turbo is upgraded, I imagine these items would shine a bit more.

PS -- If I have missed the data that substantiates significant gains from changing cams on a 9 (w/ stock turbo), please refer me to the evidence (and yes sample size should be greater than 2 lol).

 

Can you post some links to these countless posts that show this information...Because frankly, I have never seen any threads or posts that would back up what you just posted.

 

Per my earlier post, I have not seen data that shows that either set of cams (Cos. or GSC) provides a strong value proposition on a stock 9 turbo.

 

I totally agree, but I was talking to 1badgsex, asking him to enlighten us...