Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FPwhite + Evo 9 + 91oct

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #76  
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
You wouldnt belive how many people find a shoprag in their intercooler, I ask people to check for that all the time.

People also leave the red caplug in the oil drain flange of the turbo when they install it. People install a TiAl Wastegate without the valve seat. People do all sorts of weird things to be honest. When I ask you a question like that, I'm not trying to tell you that you are stupid, I am trying to get you to think about something that you havent thought about yet, something that could help solve whatever problem has caused you to call. It is unusual to have problems with Garrett T04E bb chra, which is what was found in your FP3150 turbocharger, but I do remember something weird happening to one of those (small run of these about 20 total) and us really trying to be as fast as possible about fixing it once we knew what happened, I am going to look you up tomorrow to follow up. Sorry we left such a bad impression on you.

Robert Young
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #77  
RAbishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
Interesting results. The outcome wasn't quite what I was expecting.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #78  
sspeed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: ..USA
Me either....concerned because I ordered one.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #79  
mitdrx's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: mi
Not at all. Maybe the white was actually some kind of viral marketing for the red.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:48 PM
  #80  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Well after reading all of these new posts, how does the owner of the Evo who was tuned on the White feel about his car now? How does it drive after his recent tune? I would like to hear his feedback.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 10:51 PM
  #81  
sspeed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: ..USA
Originally Posted by EvoTio
Well after reading all of these new posts, how does the owner of the Evo who was tuned on the White feel about his car now? How does it drive after his recent tune? I would like to hear his feedback.
Agreed....But before I get really bummed... Would love to see results from one or two more similarly modded cars

Last edited by sspeed; Jul 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #82  
PsychDr. HN$'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I like seeing "built" or "shop" cars dyno new products for one reason. MAXIMUM performance. I take those test for what they are. HOWEVER, when a new product is released I like seeing them on cars that not only resemble my car but your typical evo that you will see on the street. Face it most evo owners stop at full-bolt on. Most people run pump even though meth is popular and E85 is starting to become more available. I feel that those dyno numbers are accurate. I dont think its fair that some people are knockn razorlab as a tuner. Thats ridiculous. Apparently he has tuned many cars in his area. He provided us with a lots of info. His dyno sheet should be given the same amount of TRUST and RESPECT as the other where the turbo excelled.

FP is a great company and I PLAN to purchase the RED soon. My car will be your typical full bolt on evo. TBE, MBC, ETS 3.5" FMIC, UICP with evo 9 bov, Recirculation pipe, LICP, Intake, ported stock or megan manifold, megan o2 housing, GSC S2's, Springs and retainers, 255lph fuel pump, big injectors, Exedy Clutch, stock maf, and stock ECU and stock bottom end. Eventually i will add the ported intake manifold, 65mm throttle body, tial bov, and AEM EMS. Then im done. Im doing that knowing that I will make good numbers but i will be no where near the numbers of the test car.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 11:43 PM
  #83  
PsychDr. HN$'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Maybe i missed it but how did the owner of the car say how it feels now?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #84  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by CO_VR4

Some important characteristics and parameters identified are not simply not depicted on a dyno chart, like shaft speed, PR, etc... Others simply do not exist because the dyno runs were stopped at 7000 or so. Perhaps the kind of test shown by this routine dyno graph does not demonstrate the differences in real world performance, or the circumstances under which significant differences will be shown...
I've responded to shaft speed earlier in this thread. The pulls where done until 7200 and are shown on both charts. Each HP curve shows a down turn at a point before the dyno pull is completed. If "real world" performance is somewhere betwen 7200 and above then so be it.

Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
Or ignition timing, or cam timing, or AFR, or.... long list. But the airflow part is all the turbo can do.

Robert Young
Much like you did on the phone with our customer, quick to discount the tuner, I have already stated that the ignition timing and AFR are as close to the same as possible, I had to run 1* less up top because of the added flow.

Mivec was also as close as possible between the two, with slightly less mivec to account for the added flow up top. Noticing a trend here yet?

I posted these charts to show everything almost as close to the same as a true A to B comparison. Now, I wouldn't be a very good tuner if I didn't explore other "long lists" as well would I? I did, and I didn't post the results because it didn't make much difference.

Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance

Why the car isnt making any extra power with the extra airflow is a good question. I think everyone glossed right past the data again.

Robert Young
That it does according to the logs, on 91 it does flow more 6800 or so on and it does indeed make approx 12whp more from 6800 on and approx 6whp on 100 6800 rpm on.

Last edited by razorlab; Jul 11, 2008 at 12:01 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 02:02 AM
  #85  
EvoG8r's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Stavanger
I am experiencing White Rabbit de ja vu. I appreciate the test as I am considering this turbo w/m2 cams and the ability to go into higher rpms.

I would like to see TTP do one. They tend to really push the stocker using meth and high rpms. Based on what is advertised, that is where the White should shine. At this point, I can't discount the turbo until we see more results.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 02:15 AM
  #86  
supersal's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: South Africa
I think the results are about right for 91 Octane...

I'm sure with 25-28psi and 100oct this turbo should start to outshine the stock IX Turbo.

.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 02:28 AM
  #87  
Cali2MDevo8's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 0
From: MD/PA line
Originally Posted by supersal
I think the results are about right for 91 Octane...

I'm sure with 25-28psi and 100oct this turbo should start to outshine the stock IX Turbo.

.
Read the original post. The white was run with 100 octane at 26.9 psi.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 03:10 AM
  #88  
EE's Avatar
EE
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon
1st: I think the white will still outperform the 9 turbo. the key thing here is not to compare the turbos at the same boost, but to compare them at their maximum potential, or at maximum efficiency! take an hta35 and evo 9 turbo at 15 psi, there won't be much difference, this is an extreme example but just to give an idea...


2nd: when the community here asked the fp white "testers" to do a test for this turbo on a street car / pump gas, the answer was: "if you're not happy, go do it yourself".
now that some1 has done it himself, they begin to question how good a tuner he is!


rgds+
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 03:22 AM
  #89  
supersal's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by Cali2MDevo8
Read the original post. The white was run with 100 octane at 26.9 psi.

oops my bad!

.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 04:03 AM
  #90  
supersal's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: South Africa
Originally Posted by ForcedPerformance
There is NOTHING you can do to make a TD05H work better at 7K plus. Its a 'small' turbine wheel, performance is going to suffer at high RPM. Look at the exhaust pressure. Eventually it goes sky high. It doesn't matter if Tom or Fred or FP or Joe Average is using it, it has certain characteristics, it has a performance window...

I think this a very important point that most people miss the limitation of all OEM Stock frame Turbos is the Hotside...

What is the 10.5cfm Mitsu Hot side equivalent to in Garrett terms??? T3 .48 or smaller would be the most likely answer...

.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.