Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

T3 vs T4 1.06 twinscroll housings, any power/response difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #91  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
^ since when does AMS make a TS T4 turbo kit?

l8r)
Last time I went to their site they sold their GT42 kit, which they had been selling for years, which apparently is gone now....

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #92  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
I believe evo dan just ran in the 10's on pump gas on a Twin Scroll T4 Full-Race turbo setup.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 04:55 PM
  #93  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
yeah he went 10.5 on a twinscroll HTA86, 93 octane pump gas -- way to go dan!
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:24 PM
  #94  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
yeah he went 10.5 on a twinscroll HTA86, 93 octane pump gas -- way to go dan!
60' and mph?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:25 PM
  #95  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
60' and mph?
1.69 and 135.56
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 06:33 PM
  #96  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
Originally Posted by evodan2004
1.69 and 135.56
nice!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 09:10 AM
  #97  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by n2oiroc
60' and mph?
check out his thread here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/dr...-135-56-a.html
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 09:15 AM
  #98  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Stop it Geoff. TS just doesn't work!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #99  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I didn't mean to get EVODan's thread off topic or take away any from him, but I still think it's worth stating...

Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
too bad it chokes up on the top end
You do realize the fastest 93 octane EVO is Buschur's and it is in the 9s, right? Single scroll with the same turbo, pulling like 10-15mph higher traps. The car is at a different level then Dan's car and Dan is doing very well, but this doesn't prove anything on the TS debate so don't try and make it.

Originally Posted by Sean@Iveytune
Buschur went 150 on pump?? WOW.

Sean
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...y-8s-race.html
Sorry... 145 mph
Which is still within the 10-15mph range I stated.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Jun 22, 2010 at 11:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:44 AM
  #100  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Basically, evodan2004's experience proves that a car owned by a common consumer, devoid of drastic weight reducing measures, sans special suspension prep, without hundreds of man hours of specialized development, with ordinary pump gasoline, can achieve impressive dragstrip performance using a turbo configuration oft criticized as being ill-suited for the purpose.

Like the vast majority of us, Dan isn't out to set any records with his 600whp car. There plenty of others that invest far more time and money into doing that (oftentimes to support a business), and the difference between Dan's effort and Buschur's efforts boils down to more than TS vs. open turbine housings. Dan's night at the dragstrip however certainly clears any questions as to if that level of performance can be obtained as equipped.

Just my observations.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #101  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I agree fully and Dan has done a great job of proving what is capable on an above average build using TS setup.

I just didn't think it really proved anything about TS choking argument. The car with a SS setup could have easily ran as fast or faster. We don't know so there is no point in trying to draw any conclusions from it.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #102  
nyquil2's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: miami
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
I agree fully and Dan has done a great job of proving what is capable on an above average build using TS setup.

I just didn't think it really proved anything about TS choking argument. The car with a SS setup could have easily ran as fast or faster. We don't know so there is no point in trying to draw any conclusions from it.
i think the argument has always been it has better tranisent power... Boost comes on qucker....and between shifts comes back quicker.. so Time Attack would be a better candidate for Twin Scroll...and its clear that cars of that nature are using it..so it must work...
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #103  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Dan's experience simply disproves any notion that hardware which optimizes transient response results in poor dragstrip performance by default.

I don't believe there is a more simple way to say it.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #104  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
I agree fully and Dan has done a great job of proving what is capable on an above average build using TS setup.

I just didn't think it really proved anything about TS choking argument. The car with a SS setup could have easily ran as fast or faster. We don't know so there is no point in trying to draw any conclusions from it.
What is does prove is that a Twin Scroll non- drag optimized setup can run deep into the 10's on pump gas.

Does anybody out there need any more proof of what a properly setup T4 Twin Scroll setup can do?

I don't get what else you guys out there want, he gets 135 mph traps and mid 10 second runs on pump, I don't see much room for improvement considering how his car drives at partial throttle situations.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #105  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Ted and scorke. Thanks for backing me up.

Did I anywhere in the last 4 years state or ask who has the record for something? No. Did I ask for the record on TS pump or drag radials? No. Im not after anyone's records nor do I care. Im just me who lives in a blue house who likes to race and play with my car on my pocket. I have nothing to prove to anyone other then my self. I have set goals for a few things and that's it. I could care less if u like it or not.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 AM.