New BW EFR Turbo Thread
I'd love to see those results when they're in.
Bit of a strange statement saying why would you get anything under a 7670 considering the number of greens and bbk's that have sold over the years. These two turbos would be equivalent to 6758. That would be a hell of a lot of fun on the road. I'm looking at the 7163 for a bit more up top so that I can use it on the road and at the track.
If you do drag then obviously the larger turbo would be beneficial, but I find drag a little like premature ejaculation
. 10 secs and your done.
I prefer 20+ minute sessions where you are hitting corners at the absolute limit of grip. That's excitement.
Bit of a strange statement saying why would you get anything under a 7670 considering the number of greens and bbk's that have sold over the years. These two turbos would be equivalent to 6758. That would be a hell of a lot of fun on the road. I'm looking at the 7163 for a bit more up top so that I can use it on the road and at the track.
If you do drag then obviously the larger turbo would be beneficial, but I find drag a little like premature ejaculation
. 10 secs and your done.I prefer 20+ minute sessions where you are hitting corners at the absolute limit of grip. That's excitement.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
People go with Green's and BBK's because they are cheap, or at least they were at one time. The gap is closing between the cost of a stock frame upgrade and a full turbo kit, but there's still some gap, so its hard to justify spending big $$ on a turbo kit that produces the same power as a Green or BBK.
It's not very useful as a comparison until you know what turbine housing they used on the 7670, which isn't stated on that page. Anybody happen to know what it was?
The 7163 apparently was using the .64 a/r housing which should make it come on nice and early.
At the moment, I don't even see any .64 a/r housing listed as an option for the 7163, looking at the Full-Race web page for the turbo.
The 7163 apparently was using the .64 a/r housing which should make it come on nice and early.
At the moment, I don't even see any .64 a/r housing listed as an option for the 7163, looking at the Full-Race web page for the turbo.
People go with Green's and BBK's because they are cheap, or at least they were at one time. The gap is closing between the cost of a stock frame upgrade and a full turbo kit, but there's still some gap, so its hard to justify spending big $$ on a turbo kit that produces the same power as a Green or BBK.
Unless CBRD want's to put an 8374 EFR in a stock housing lol.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I do love love the TiAl turbine wheel on the EFRs, but as I wrote above, I couldn't justify the cost of the 7163 compared to my BBK-3B. BBK-3B, manifold, DP, LICP, and intake cost about $3800 while the 7163 would have cost me around $4800. Best as I can tell, they will have nearly identical powerbands. Perhaps I underestimate how much better the transient response could be for a TS 7163, but I can say for sure that the BBK-3B is a lot of fun.
Incredibly efficient, eh?
I do love love the TiAl turbine wheel on the EFRs, but as I wrote above, I couldn't justify the cost of the 7163 compared to my BBK-3B. BBK-3B, manifold, DP, LICP, and intake cost about $3800 while the 7163 would have cost me around $4800. Best as I can tell, they will have nearly identical powerbands. Perhaps I underestimate how much better the transient response could be for a TS 7163, but I can say for sure that the BBK-3B is a lot of fun.
I do love love the TiAl turbine wheel on the EFRs, but as I wrote above, I couldn't justify the cost of the 7163 compared to my BBK-3B. BBK-3B, manifold, DP, LICP, and intake cost about $3800 while the 7163 would have cost me around $4800. Best as I can tell, they will have nearly identical powerbands. Perhaps I underestimate how much better the transient response could be for a TS 7163, but I can say for sure that the BBK-3B is a lot of fun.Cost, well I guess it is a little cheaper.
I could have gone either way but I chose to go with the 3b.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
It would have been much more than $1000 for me because I already had the 3B system together. I had been waiting 6 months for the 7163 with no sign of a release and couldn't wait any longer. Heck, Geoff still hasn't gotten around to releasing the bottom mount 7163 manifold that I would have wanted to use. It would have been a $2000 investment to swap to the 7163 with the only tangible gain being an increase in transient response. The 3B is already pretty impressive in this area, so I couldn't see the point of going through all the hassle. At this point, I'm holding out for a revised 7670 with a mixed flow turbine and quick spool valve.
As much as I love the EFR series turbos and all of the incremental improvements they bring, they're still just incremental improvements over traditional turbo technology.
However, if Geoff ever finds time to release the low-mount 7163 header and EFR releases the QSV turbos, I'm going to have a hard time resisting.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I could swear he said he was just finishing up on his own car when I chatted with him a few months ago. Still not on the website, but that's not uncommon for Full-Race.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
ok, I looked back at my email and now I'm confused. That's the same picture that Geoff sent me back in November when he was talking about his personal Evo. I guess he made one for his car and your buddy's?
BTW, since your buddy's Evo has apparently been assembled since October-ish, is there a dyno sheet?
BTW, since your buddy's Evo has apparently been assembled since October-ish, is there a dyno sheet?







