Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 09:08 AM
  #3601  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
we shipped an EFR 7163 IWG single scroll kit to singapore this week for use on a 2.2 4b11T evo X motor- ill see if he can post results-

cb
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 09:12 AM
  #3602  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
That would be great, but there are 7163 4B11 dyno charts out there. We are all itching to see a 7163 4g63 dyno chart.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 03:40 PM
  #3603  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Too bad the tilton evo is retired now.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 04:38 PM
  #3604  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by Uhuru
I agree, but looking at Tilton car and components, I would say money is no object

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...ilton-Evo.aspx

They say EFR 9180
This is a great article with a lot of fantastic photos, thanks for the link. I'll probably copy all 9 pages out as mht files to save on my computer, in case they take this off the web.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2015 | 07:17 PM
  #3605  
Uhuru's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 101
Likes: 4
From: Croatia
Originally Posted by Talonboost
This is a great article with a lot of fantastic photos, thanks for the link. I'll probably copy all 9 pages out as mht files to save on my computer, in case they take this off the web.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2015 | 12:54 PM
  #3606  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
Yep, I spent over $4k getting every friction surface in the entire drivetrain wpc treated. The treated surfaces were all worn off within 100 miles. Wasted money IMO

WPC did have very good customer service though and Izumi is a very nice guy.
So if WPC is like shot peening, how did the treated surfaces "wear off" in less than 100 miles? What did you measure to say the treatment was worn off? Did you take pics of the metal surfaces under a microscope?

Also, what did Izumi say?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 11:17 AM
  #3607  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Originally Posted by FossilAus
Tilton used a 9180 with 1.05 housing last year. They went to the 1.45 'Race' housing this year, obviously use T4 EWG configuration. Nitrous was used without issue, just a squirt down the front straight. Theres a theoretical 1.22 in the car which is pretty damn impressive, faster than most open wheelers around SMSP

EFR's are all the rage at WTAC, every Evo in attendance would have been running a 8374 or larger
This is correct.

Originally Posted by kikiturbo
Nitro is probably cheaper overall than a propper antilag system.
Nitrous wasn't used as an anti-lag, it was used to increase horsepower down the main straight.

Originally Posted by hispanicpanic
Yes, indy uses EFR's. They use twin 6758's or a single 9180 i believe, depending on the manufacturer. The jury is still out on single vs twin turbo on the Indy cars. I'm somewhat certain that the turbos must last as long as their engines, which is a handfull of races minimum i believe. I don't follow indy so..... yeah.
Yessir, it's two 7163's or a 9180 now.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 11:18 AM
  #3608  
RWD4G63's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 153
Likes: 11
From: Mattawan, MI
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
So if WPC is like shot peening, how did the treated surfaces "wear off" in less than 100 miles? What did you measure to say the treatment was worn off? Did you take pics of the metal surfaces under a microscope?

Also, what did Izumi say?
Drivetrain parts are under extremely heavy strain, and I can see why they would "polish" after a few hundred miles, but that doesn't mean the WPC treatment hasn't affected the part.

The better question is, why was he taking his transmission apart after 100 miles?
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 11:53 AM
  #3609  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
So if WPC is like shot peening, how did the treated surfaces "wear off" in less than 100 miles? What did you measure to say the treatment was worn off? Did you take pics of the metal surfaces under a microscope?

Also, what did Izumi say?
The matte gray surface from the treatment isn't the actual treatment itself, just a side-effect. So just because the surface went back to a normal colour - doesn't mean the treatment hasn't worked.
What Erik said
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 03:53 PM
  #3610  
FossilAus's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 110
Likes: 2
From: Australia
Originally Posted by hispanicpanic
This year tilton used a borg warner s500 i believe. No longer with the EFR series as they're not big enough. The s500 netted them something like 1200 hp i believe.
Not true. Its a 9180. Saw it in the flesh at EvoNats and WTAC15, also had a discussion with the Tilton tuner who confirmed this
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 04:09 PM
  #3611  
lOOkatme's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Talonboost
This is a great article with a lot of fantastic photos, thanks for the link. I'll probably copy all 9 pages out as mht files to save on my computer, in case they take this off the web.
I definitely liked the article!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 05:59 PM
  #3612  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by lOOkatme
I definitely liked the article!
Yes and I noticed that if you want to see the pics a little better, you can. They show as 700 x 467 resolution in the article, but if you right click on one and save it to your computer, then bring it up in your regular photo viewer, they are actually 800 x 534.
Also, if you save each page as an .mht file type (you need Microsoft Internet Explorer to do that) you get it all, and if it turns out that you don't have IE anymore someday, you can still open up the mht files very nicely in Microsoft Word. They sometimes don't work in Chrome though.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 08:17 PM
  #3613  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
So if WPC is like shot peening, how did the treated surfaces "wear off" in less than 100 miles? What did you measure to say the treatment was worn off? Did you take pics of the metal surfaces under a microscope?

Also, what did Izumi say?
Obviously I didnt take pics of them under a microscope, lol, but I have built quite a few motors/transmissions and know what things look like and every thing looked like it hadnt been treated at all after only 100 miles.

Do what you want with your money, Im just sharing my experience.

I didnt bring it up to Izumi because I do not feel the need to. I did the WPC treatment because I wanted to try something new with my car to see if it will help. I knew it was a gamble and I am not worried about the money lost.

I have a bore scope and I am OCD with my car, so that is how and why I can see what things look like after only 100 miles.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 08:36 PM
  #3614  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
The WPC treatment is stated to produced a modified layer that is only 0.001" thick. I'm wondering if this is somewhat analogous to waterjet peening that is used in various industries. Waterjet peened surfaces have a highly strained/hardened nanocrystalline layer that is ~0.001" thick, but additional hardening occurs beyond that layer to a depth of as much a 0.005" depending on what article is read.

Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2015 | 08:44 PM
  #3615  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by mrfred
The WPC treatment is stated to produced a modified layer that is only 0.001" thick. I'm wondering if this is somewhat analogous to waterjet peening that is used in various industries. Waterjet peened surfaces have a highly strained/hardened nanocrystalline layer that is ~0.001" thick, but additional hardening occurs beyond that layer to a depth of as much a 0.005" depending on what article is read.

Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
For example, the valve tappets looked exactly the same as a non-treated tappet with any miles on it.

I did the little test of 2 valve tappets spinning on top of each other and the WPC treated ones spun significantly longer than the non-treated tappets. There is definitely a reduction in friction while the treated surface is intact. However, that was immediately after I received them from being treated and before they went into the motor.

I have zero interest in trying to ruin WPC's name as I know there are people who have had success with it. I am just sharing my opinion
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 PM.