New BW EFR Turbo Thread
I agree, but looking at Tilton car and components, I would say money is no object 
http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...ilton-Evo.aspx
They say EFR 9180

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...ilton-Evo.aspx
They say EFR 9180
Also, what did Izumi say?
Tilton used a 9180 with 1.05 housing last year. They went to the 1.45 'Race' housing this year, obviously use T4 EWG configuration. Nitrous was used without issue, just a squirt down the front straight. Theres a theoretical 1.22 in the car which is pretty damn impressive, faster than most open wheelers around SMSP
EFR's are all the rage at WTAC, every Evo in attendance would have been running a 8374 or larger
EFR's are all the rage at WTAC, every Evo in attendance would have been running a 8374 or larger
Nitrous wasn't used as an anti-lag, it was used to increase horsepower down the main straight.
Yes, indy uses EFR's. They use twin 6758's or a single 9180 i believe, depending on the manufacturer. The jury is still out on single vs twin turbo on the Indy cars. I'm somewhat certain that the turbos must last as long as their engines, which is a handfull of races minimum i believe. I don't follow indy so..... yeah.
The better question is, why was he taking his transmission apart after 100 miles?
What Erik said
Not true. Its a 9180. Saw it in the flesh at EvoNats and WTAC15, also had a discussion with the Tilton tuner who confirmed this
Yes and I noticed that if you want to see the pics a little better, you can. They show as 700 x 467 resolution in the article, but if you right click on one and save it to your computer, then bring it up in your regular photo viewer, they are actually 800 x 534.
Also, if you save each page as an .mht file type (you need Microsoft Internet Explorer to do that) you get it all, and if it turns out that you don't have IE anymore someday, you can still open up the mht files very nicely in Microsoft Word. They sometimes don't work in Chrome though.
Also, if you save each page as an .mht file type (you need Microsoft Internet Explorer to do that) you get it all, and if it turns out that you don't have IE anymore someday, you can still open up the mht files very nicely in Microsoft Word. They sometimes don't work in Chrome though.
Do what you want with your money, Im just sharing my experience.
I didnt bring it up to Izumi because I do not feel the need to. I did the WPC treatment because I wanted to try something new with my car to see if it will help. I knew it was a gamble and I am not worried about the money lost.
I have a bore scope and I am OCD with my car, so that is how and why I can see what things look like after only 100 miles.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
The WPC treatment is stated to produced a modified layer that is only 0.001" thick. I'm wondering if this is somewhat analogous to waterjet peening that is used in various industries. Waterjet peened surfaces have a highly strained/hardened nanocrystalline layer that is ~0.001" thick, but additional hardening occurs beyond that layer to a depth of as much a 0.005" depending on what article is read.
Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
The WPC treatment is stated to produced a modified layer that is only 0.001" thick. I'm wondering if this is somewhat analogous to waterjet peening that is used in various industries. Waterjet peened surfaces have a highly strained/hardened nanocrystalline layer that is ~0.001" thick, but additional hardening occurs beyond that layer to a depth of as much a 0.005" depending on what article is read.
Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
Anyhow, there is a chance that some of the WPC affected surface layer remained even with the surface having a polished appearance. I think it would be necessary to cross-section a piece to determine whether it had really been worn through.
I did the little test of 2 valve tappets spinning on top of each other and the WPC treated ones spun significantly longer than the non-treated tappets. There is definitely a reduction in friction while the treated surface is intact. However, that was immediately after I received them from being treated and before they went into the motor.
I have zero interest in trying to ruin WPC's name as I know there are people who have had success with it. I am just sharing my opinion







