Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New BW EFR Turbo Thread

Old Nov 26, 2015 | 03:03 PM
  #3676  
altrix99's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Construct
Thanks for sharing that chart, CBRD. Really good to see some results.



Even if the rest of the mods weren't ideal, the post says that the mods were the same for (aside from the turbo, obviously) for the comparison.
Normally, a larger turbo with the same restrictions are much laggier then the smaller turbo. I've tuned turbos where an inlet change would pick up 40+whp and 400rpms in spool. Anyhow, the TS 7163 spools very well.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2015 | 03:39 PM
  #3677  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
is this on 93oct or E85?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 07:18 AM
  #3678  
apexsilverbbx's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
93 octane
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 11:10 AM
  #3679  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
ALL of our basic testing shown is normally stock block, 93 etc... nothing dramatic-

we are actually testing a new CBRD intake on the car- we will see what (if) that does LOL!

cb
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2015 | 02:50 PM
  #3680  
tutuur's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
I know this probably won't apply to any of you but i'm after a bit of advice. I originally wanted to use an efr 6758 t25 as my power goal isn't any higher as 450, however i can now get a 7163 alu cored ts turbo for only €150 more.

Btw, a 6758 ts is an option too at only €80 more than the ss 6758

It's for a fwd car so torque would be limitted anyway, also i'd have to fab a mani for both so no problem in that regard...

How do ts cars sound compared to ss? Because of the restrictive nature of the original ts turbo it sounds like a coffee machine, wonder how that works out with the BW's.

Your views are highly appreciated!

Last edited by tutuur; Nov 30, 2015 at 03:01 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2015 | 04:59 AM
  #3681  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 725
Likes: 13
From: san antonio
If i stay in Nasa TT3, i honestly considered a twin scroll 6758. It would allow me to stick to 93 and stay at my power levels which over around 340-350 wheel. I have a feeling it'll also be lighter than the stock turbo.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2015 | 10:00 AM
  #3682  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by hispanicpanic
If i stay in Nasa TT3, i honestly considered a twin scroll 6758. It would allow me to stick to 93 and stay at my power levels which over around 340-350 wheel. I have a feeling it'll also be lighter than the stock turbo.
don't forget the rule change for TT3 next year. 10:1 weight/power ratio and new calculation for average HP, not peak HP anymore.

i'm running stock turbo on stock long block and e85 and i have trouble keeping the HP down this year, i'll actually have to add 200 lbs of ballast for next year.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2015 | 12:26 PM
  #3683  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by honda-guy
don't forget the rule change for TT3 next year. 10:1 weight/power ratio and new calculation for average HP, not peak HP anymore.

i'm running stock turbo on stock long block and e85 and i have trouble keeping the HP down this year, i'll actually have to add 200 lbs of ballast for next year.
His evo X comes with 200lbs of ballast from the factory
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2015 | 07:11 PM
  #3684  
RS200's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 118
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
hay guise!

I'm joining your clique club, just scooped a 7670 with .92 IWG for $1000 for my Evo 1.


Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 05:28 AM
  #3685  
hispanicpanic's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 725
Likes: 13
From: san antonio
Originally Posted by honda-guy
don't forget the rule change for TT3 next year. 10:1 weight/power ratio and new calculation for average HP, not peak HP anymore.

i'm running stock turbo on stock long block and e85 and i have trouble keeping the HP down this year, i'll actually have to add 200 lbs of ballast for next year.
No official calculators have been released yet, but it seems with all the changes, a 2015 9.0 car with full aero will no be a 9.6 under the new rules on the 2015 calculator. Moving from 9.6 to 10.0 is only like 10-15 hp. Horsepower has a massive influence in the ratio's it seems.

I was previously tuned to 311 Max, and running the calcs it seems my average is 300-303, depending on how you interpret the graph. I'll need to get tuned to a 335-340 hp average to hit 9.6 on the current calculator, which should be a 10.0 on the new calculator if estimates are correct.

Honestly, e85 is great, but with e85 comes a much greater uncertainty in your final weights due to the volume you'll use in a session. From a rules compliance standpoint, 93 is a much better choice of fuel. Your weights will also be more consistent throughout a run, though i doubt most people could feel the difference.

Oh and one more thing. Fuel makes a great ballast
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 02:26 PM
  #3686  
Lopov1972's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Great Turbo! I love the EFR Series..
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 02:28 PM
  #3687  
Lopov1972's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Any results from a 7670 on a 2 Liter / E85??
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 02:29 PM
  #3688  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by CBRD
we are considering a T4 IWG evo 8/9 kit since people keep asking- but the manifold design would be drastically different than our current EWG 7163 EVO 8/9 kit-
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 02:37 PM
  #3689  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by RS200
hay guise!

I'm joining your clique club, just scooped a 7670 with .92 IWG for $1000 for my Evo 1.


cant imagine that fitting well in the small engine compartment. surely no a/c and the radiator stuffed under the core support. and it still may not fit.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2015 | 03:38 PM
  #3690  
RS200's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 118
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
cant imagine that fitting well in the small engine compartment. surely no a/c and the radiator stuffed under the core support. and it still may not fit.
It's an RS so no AC, and tucking the radiator with a pusher fan is the plan.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:58 PM.