Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine
152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63
355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny
138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny
109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD
132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo
164
24.01%
Exterior looks
305
44.66%
Interior quality
148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight
79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding
165
24.16%
Price
261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity
133
19.47%
Brakes
163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times
201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll

Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 01:44 PM
  #1906  
Ryanmcd2's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
The evo is better on the race track. not 1/4 track. I like the EVO better then the STI. I don't like the bird trap on the hood of the STI.



Originally posted by ryancb
there is no replacment for displacment if i remember correct :-p
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 02:53 PM
  #1907  
Pli's Avatar
Pli
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: san diego CA
Sure the sti has more power but the 6 spd was set up more for drag then top end. STi has a final drive of 3.9:1 wile the evo has a final drive of 4.529:1 making the evos gearing longer and there for giving the evo a better top end. Subaru claims a top end of 145 for the STi while mitsubishi claims a top end of 156 for the evo.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 02:56 PM
  #1908  
evo'skickass's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
the top end on the Sti is restricted by a governer, while the top end on the evo is redline limited
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #1909  
berkel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 651
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Pli
Sure the sti has more power but the 6 spd was set up more for drag then top end. STi has a final drive of 3.9:1 wile the evo has a final drive of 4.529:1 making the evos gearing longer and there for giving the evo a better top end. Subaru claims a top end of 145 for the STi while mitsubishi claims a top end of 156 for the evo.
Hi,

First, I think having 6 speeds so closely spaced can actually hurt the STi since you have to shift so many times for drag racing. Also think the STi is electronically limited top speed?

Anyway, a lower final drive makes your gearing longer. This makes sense for the STi since it also has an extra gear. The EVO has very tight gearing with a FD of 4.529:1.

In my GSR, the FD was ~4.4:1. I swapped to an ITR tranny with gearing that is closer together, and added a JDM FD which was 4.75:1 to make the gearing even tighter.

Finally, isn't fuel cut for the EVO about 7400? If so, you can look at your speed at ~3700 rpm and double that for top speed as long as you can spin 5th gear to fuel cut. I don't think the EVO is that quick up top, but I have hit indicated 140 up a slight hill with a 200 lbs passenger along with me (~160 lbs). I would think that with enough mods you can spin 5th gear and hit 160+, if you were crazy enough to try.

Thoughts?

FB
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 09:05 PM
  #1910  
ERacer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Pli, you got final drive backwards as far gearing for top end.

berkel, don't think you can just double your speed at 3700 rpm.
There are other factors to consider. Drag and friction are a few that come to mind.

Yes, the STi is electronically limited.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #1911  
umiami80's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Evo has better potential for topend, Big 16G and ease of tuning. It was VERY detuned for US market, I did 2 mods and would show tails to a STI even from a roll, sti is way harder to mod and doubt the engine internals are as strong. STroked engines make more low end torque but suffer up top.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 04:34 AM
  #1912  
berkel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 651
Likes: 1
Originally posted by ERacer
Pli, you got final drive backwards as far gearing for top end.

berkel, don't think you can just double your speed at 3700 rpm.
There are other factors to consider. Drag and friction are a few that come to mind.

Actually, what I meant was that your theoretical top end would be if you double the speed at 3700 rpm (or whatever half of fuel cut or redline is). I did said IF you have enough power to spin 5th gear.

Basically, you're either gear limited, drag limited, or electronically limited. If you're gear limited, it's when you spin you're biggest gear as fast as it goes. If you're drag limited, drag prevents you from achieving that maximum engine speed in the biggest gear. If you're electronically limited, obviously the ecu or other governor cuts fuel or in some way limits top speed.

The other thing to look at is the grade of the road. If there is a slight (even imperceptible) downgrade, you'll increase your top speed (if you're drag limited) quite a bit. In other words, the road may look flat, but may actually slope downwards. So your "top speed" may not be scientific of what you could achieve on a totally flat road, but oh well, it's real world, heh. I would guess a stock EVO is drag limited on a FLAT road, but with enough mods or a slight downhill, I bet you could redline 5th gear.

As I said before, I hit indicated 140 (we haven't even gotten into speedo error ), with a ~200lbs passenger and on a slight uphill and the car was still pulling, albeit fairly slowly...

Take care,

FB
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #1913  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
The quicker steering rack is reason alone to choose the Evo for twisty roads.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 05:31 AM
  #1914  
Scot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: SS
0-130 the STI is ahead by 4 seconds according to Car and Driver.... that seems about right... my Evo sucks from 5th gear...

I attempted a top speed run, but after about 1.5 miles I was only at 145mph and had to brake for traffic.....and the last 1/2 of a mile was even somewhat downhill.

STI has 6th gear to help spread out the gears better....

0-150 would probably be about 45 seconds.....
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 08:51 AM
  #1915  
Rafal's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally posted by joeycoates
The Evo may be faster top end, but it takes a long time to get there. I found myself on a very long arrow straight stretch of three lane highway yesturday and let my Evo have at it. I eventually hit 153 according to the HKS Type 1 peak speed hold but it took a while to get there. I do think that givin a piggy back computer and a turbo back exhaust that the mph gain up top would be much quiker, but stock the Evo just does not have crazy pull above 120.
That's strange.
My STi pulls quite hard to little below 150 mph on speedometer (so probably less then 140 mph) and suddenly stops. So up to the limiter it goes quite strong. EVO is not much weaker so it should pull the same. And STi has small injectors and especially a small turbo, which goes quite fast out of breath.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 08:53 AM
  #1916  
Jonasan50's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl
162... what the rpm's were...
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #1917  
Rafal's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally posted by umiami80
Evo has better potential for topend, Big 16G and ease of tuning. It was VERY detuned for US market, I did 2 mods and would show tails to a STI even from a roll, sti is way harder to mod and doubt the engine internals are as strong. STroked engines make more low end torque but suffer up top.
What do you know about STi's engine what other people don't?
I did not hear yet about any blown STi's engine by a tuner and they are still working on it. And Vishnu was surprised by it's potential.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2003 | 12:47 PM
  #1918  
mikec's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Scot. How does 0-100 acceleration compare between your Evo and '03 Cobra? Just curious. Thanks, Mike.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 08:37 AM
  #1919  
watchout's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
I can't remember where I read this but one of the tuners said mod potential definately goes to the evo. So in the end when all is said and done, the mods have been put on, the evo would be faster. This isn't proven but it does mirror alot of peoples thoughts about evo being easier to work on and make go faster.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2003 | 09:10 AM
  #1920  
okijack's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Enterprise, AL
I had the pleasure of encountering an STi on a clear three lane a while back. I was crusing along in third (I was driving slow, enjoying the sights). He pulled up next to me and gave me a thumbs up and the signal that he wanted to race. We both punched our cars at about the same time. From third to the top of fourth, I pulled about two car lengths on him. Afterwards, we both pulled over and talked. His STi was stock. My EVO (At that time) had a 3" turbo back and intake. Based on my old dyno's with those mods, I was pushing 300hp to the flywheel (About even with a stock STi). I think what gave me an advantage was lighter weight (He was a big dude, I am small) and gearing.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50 PM.