Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Choose which ones will influence your decision
Wow, 300hp, 300 ft-lbs from 2.5L Subaru boxer engine
152
22.25%
Proven tuning potential of the Mitsubishi 4G63
355
51.98%
Subaru\'s strong 6-speed manual tranny
138
20.20%
Mitsubishi\'s dependable 5-speed tranny
109
15.96%
DCCD on the STi... wish Evo had ACD
132
19.33%
Stock FMIC on the Evo
164
24.01%
Exterior looks
305
44.66%
Interior quality
148
21.67%
Gross Vehicle Weight
79
11.57%
I want to test drive both before deciding
165
24.16%
Price
261
38.21%
Body Shell Rigidity
133
19.47%
Brakes
163
23.87%
0 - 60 mph and 1/4 mile times
201
29.43%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 683. You may not vote on this poll

Evo vs. STI | Anything and Everything [ALL THREADS MERGED]

Old Feb 13, 2004 | 05:58 AM
  #2296  
bluevilevo8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: FL
Originally posted by infin|ty
According to the dealer Evos are not covered under this. They will still have 3 year/36k mile. Anyone confirm?
Our powertrain warranty is 6y/60k
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 06:27 AM
  #2297  
JDF's Avatar
JDF
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I got the 7 yr. b2b. What the hell, its only money, right?
Congrats on ur test drive of the EVO. I LOVE mine. If you want the comfy ride get the RX8. The 8 gets attention like the EVO, has 1/2 the turning radius, RWD (read fun to drift), and smooth as silk. Not for me though.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #2298  
Hummer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: KC
Originally posted by SRT-4_Destroyer
I have no idea whether it is costlier to mod, but god damn is it costly to modify the STI. I guess I need to stake out my corner in Hollywood again if I am to give my baby any additional power.
$2200.00 for 50+ WHP is not too bad. That is the Vishnu stage 1.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 09:17 AM
  #2299  
Thedread's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Cali
It really is is a toss up. The payment difference is not significant between the two (if $25 to $50/month is a big difference to you then you should not get either car because you probably can't afford them). It comes down to personal preference. I'm happy just to have the choice.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #2300  
Talon16G's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: S. CA
If Thedread was responding to me, I'd have to disagree with you. It's not an affordability issue, it's a question of value. For a $4,500 price difference, you're talking about significant amount of modifications you could perform for the same amount of money. If I value them equally, why would I pay $4,500 extra just because I can afford to.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #2301  
OnlineAlias's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Home of USGP!
Call me gay if you want, but, I gots to have a sunroof. Didn't even drive an Sti cause no sun a shinin...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #2302  
Air Assult's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
the aftermarket
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #2303  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
RX-8 does absolutely nothing for me. Ugly.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #2304  
EVOLOVE's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Drove both, and the Evo was far and away the better drive. There was no question once I drove them. Definitely not gonna pay more for the car that didn't seem better in any respect in the test drive.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #2305  
spyderturbo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
To this day, I still went with the Evo mostly because it has the driving experience I was looking for. I think if the STi got similar handling reviews as the Evo did, I might of jumped ship.

But it didn't..
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 10:46 AM
  #2306  
pk!'s Avatar
pk!
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
edit
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #2307  
Fujilicious's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Tundra of Upstate NY
Just drove an Sti and after a drive in an Evo, declare the Evo the more athletic of the two. I loved the STi roll-on power and the high-quality "feel" that was a carryover from my WRX but it felt less alive in it's responses.

My decision will likely come down to price and perceived reliability. As much as I wish that nagging sensation would go away, my gut tells me that I'll have fewer problems long-term with the Sti. But, if I can surpress that feeling and get one of these deals for $2 - $3K less than I can find any STi for, Evo it is.

Dammit, wish I'd never seen those pictures of rusty bumper mounting points!
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #2308  
infin|ty's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Yes the differences are very tight. The "downsides" to either are so small.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #2309  
JRock's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: West
Test driven both. Daily driver - STi. Pure performance - Evo8. Simple as that. IMHO.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 06:23 PM
  #2310  
JRock's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: West
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...272#post749272
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:26 AM.