Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

2007 Sky Redline, S2000 Knockout???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #46  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 84
From: Asleep at the wheel
I'd take an '06 Boxster S over the S2000... but none of the others, nor an older Boxster. To each his own, but the Z4 and Sky/Solstice twins are ugly to me.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:10 PM
  #47  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 84
From: Asleep at the wheel
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
It would be if you took a stock picture of a S2K. i would take the power over the powerless S2K any day... you are one of the biggest honda fanboi's i have ever seen on this site. God!!! go away please, your car is a chick car get over it.. the only reason you can even say its a sports car is because its RWD. other than that its a slug. nothing more nothing less.
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
Thats something that someone says when they cant afford the car they really want .... so your telling me that if someone told you, you could pick one and only one car out of those 4 (saturn, honda, porsche,BMW)... you would actually pick the Honda ......... Ok buddy keep telling yourself that
What's funny is how many hundreds of Evo owners on this board do the exact same thing whenever the Evo gets compared to another car. Discuss any sports car here, and within a few posts you'll see "Yeah, I could add some mods and smoke it!" or "hot, but I'd rather have an Evo with a stage 3". I've seen people say they'd rather have a tuned Evo than a C6 Z06 or a 911.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:12 PM
  #48  
Tpayne84's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville TN
Originally Posted by AznX TL
actually........i would too, porsche, bmw are nice cars but for their price i would rather have a modded s2k and i would def. take the s2k over that saturn, even if it is turbo
Yeah because 30+k is a bargan for "sports" car with no TQ and bairly any HP....I reread my post and i never mentioned anything about a "modded" S2K. Where did you get that from?
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #49  
Tpayne84's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville TN
Originally Posted by WestSideBilly
What's funny is how many hundreds of Evo owners on this board do the exact same thing whenever the Evo gets compared to another car. Discuss any sports car here, and within a few posts you'll see "Yeah, I could add some mods and smoke it!" or "hot, but I'd rather have an Evo with a stage 3". I've seen people say they'd rather have a tuned Evo than a C6 Z06 or a 911.
I love my EVO but i would never take it over a C6 or a C6 Z06 and deff not a 911.. those cars are in a class of there own as with many others. i know what your saying though and i agree. im just sick of the S2K vs. EVO threads and talk.......
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #50  
Mulholland0132's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: CT
I dont care what car manufacturer you have wood for...the saturn looks nice and will give those looking for a small sporty convertable a new choice.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #51  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 84
From: Asleep at the wheel
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
I love my EVO but i would never take it over a C6 or a C6 Z06 and deff not a 911.. those cars are in a class of there own as with many others. i know what your saying though and i agree. im just sick of the S2K vs. EVO threads and talk.......
I am too They're so completely different.


The Sky Redline and S2000 are a pretty good match, really. Even though the numbers don't seem equal, their performance will end up pretty comparable. The S2000 will still be a better AutoX and track car, I suspect.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:41 PM
  #52  
NEO-EVO's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
I genuinely believe that all this negative reception to both the Solstice and the Sky is because of the stigma many people associate with their respective manufacturers. Lets be honest, Pontiac has been heading in a downward spiral for many years, and even the GTO had such a poor reception the company hardly gets looked at. Saturn has always been such a family oriented company that to now throw in a sports car is making everyone wonder if Saturn is capable of selling to the correct market or later to support it properly with the required dealer maintenance services. Most people will never realize that neither Saturn or Pontiac designed these cars, but their names alone will be the cars downfall.

If Opel or Vauxhall had entered into the US market with these cars, I do believe that these cars would be getting much better word of mouth press from everyone simply because they are not either Pontiac or Saturn. I think they are both very good looking cars, and based soley on specs, have the capability to be semi performance vehicles. Being roadsters, they definitely will make for fun rides.

Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #53  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,965
Likes: 84
From: Asleep at the wheel
The regular Solstice has been selling extremely well. I think there are enough people with faith in Pontiac to sustain the sales GM needs to make money on the car, at least for a couple of years. Saturn is a different story; Saturn has a very 'cheap' image and I think a lot of people will balk at a $30,000 Saturn much like people balk at a $30,000 Hyundai.

The GTO, while a pretty decent car for the money, never did anything for most buyers. I think a lot has to do with GM's mentality at the time that simply calling it a GTO would bring people in, which never happened. It doesn't look like that'll be a problem with the Solstice.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #54  
othreevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ / Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
Thats something that someone says when they cant afford the car they really want .... so your telling me that if someone told you, you could pick one and only one car out of those 4 (saturn, honda, porsche,BMW)... you would actually pick the Honda ......... Ok buddy keep telling yourself that
As a matter of fact I've owned two VW GTIs, a 1.8T and a VR6, a BMW M Coupe, an Evo, and I traded the Evo in on this 2006 Honda.

And yes I am telling you that if someone gave me the choice between the saturn listed, the s2000, a porsche boxster s, or a bmw z4, WITHOUT A DOUBT i would choose the S2000.....

And I did pick the S2000 and I have no regrets.... buddy

Last edited by othreevo; Apr 14, 2006 at 08:42 PM.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:42 PM
  #55  
Turbolover's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Phx,AZ
No way this will out-sell s2000! Bad idea
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #56  
prostcj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Carlock, IL
Originally Posted by Turbolover
No way this will out-sell s2000! Bad idea
I bet it will in the U.S. Every dealer has a long waiting list for just the non-turbo sky.
GM is hoping the sky will be the hit that the Miata was in the learly 90's. I think it is one of the best ideas GM has had in a while.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 09:07 PM
  #57  
othreevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ / Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
It would be if you took a stock picture of a S2K. i would take the power over the powerless S2K any day... you are one of the biggest honda fanboi's i have ever seen on this site. God!!! go away please, your car is a chick car get over it.. the only reason you can even say its a sports car is because its RWD. other than that its a slug. nothing more nothing less.
Here I'll help you all with the visual:



OR





Old Apr 14, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #58  
Tpayne84's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville TN
Yeah its great^^ but if i were going for looks and not performance i wouldnt get a chick car. i would get a porsche or something that actually looks like a guys car.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #59  
othreevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ / Plano, TX
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
Yeah its great^^ but if i were going for looks and not performance i wouldnt get a chick car. i would get a porsche or something that actually looks like a guys car.
Where do you get the idea that the S2000 is a chick car?

The majority of owners I know and have seen are older men and 18-30 year old men. Not that there aren't the occasional women drivers.

In my opinion there will probably be more women driving this Saturn than the S2000.

It's sad that the stereotype of the 2 seater convertible sports cars, i.e. the miata, s2000, and others are simply labeled 'chick cars'

Last edited by othreevo; Apr 14, 2006 at 10:08 PM.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #60  
il2az's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ/ Northbrook, IL
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
Thats something that someone says when they cant afford the car they really want .... so your telling me that if someone told you, you could pick one and only one car out of those 4 (saturn, honda, porsche,BMW)... you would actually pick the Honda ......... Ok buddy keep telling yourself that
You couldn't be more wrong... I would take the s2k in a second over all those cars, even over my evo.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.