Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Focus RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 08:03 AM
  #1876  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
2) What is the purpose of bumpers?

The car bumper is designed to prevent or reduce physical damage to the front and rear ends of passenger motor vehicles in low-speed collisions. Automobile bumpers are not typically designed to be structural components that would significantly contribute to vehicle crash worthiness or occupant protection during front or rear collisions. It is not a safety feature intended to prevent or mitigate injury severity to occupants in the passenger cars. Bumpers are designed to protect the hood, trunk, grille, fuel, exhaust and cooling system as well as safety related equipment such as parking lights, headlamps and taillights in low speed collisions.
for those worried about removing them.

I removed around 400lbs from my car. most of which equated to making car safer by improving braking, handling and acceleration. I also added epoxy foam to all the open frame rails of the shell. this strengthens rigidity by about 40%. much like adding a roll bar without endangering passengers and taking up space in the interior. the vehicle can be insured through grundy and haverty for like 1/3 what it cost to insure your late model. its much cheaper own to fix and maintain. my car is not for everybody. but calling it a "deathtrap" is pretty weak all around.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 08:20 AM
  #1877  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
I feel completely safe in my CP9A. The car responds at the speed of thought. But I use to ride sport bikes, so my bar for feeling safe is probably skewed. There are always Volvos and SUVs out there for those who need more protection
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 08:32 AM
  #1878  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Then keep driving your 10 year old car for the next 20 years.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 08:40 AM
  #1879  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Then keep driving your 10 year old car for the next 20 years.
I plan on it I also have 2 trucks and a Ford Focus. So I have the choice of vehicle for a variety of uses.

The saying "they don't make them like they used to" really does hold true for light weight awd turbo cars. Being from Canada where you can easily get the whole range of WRC legends, I would think you would understand.

But I guess the Drives: to the store and back comment in your signature explains a lot.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 08:57 AM
  #1880  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I do understand, but that doesn't mean I want to daily a car designed in the 90s with technology from the early 2000s.

You know the saying "assumptions make an *** out of you and me"? That applies to your comment, or at least the "you" portion. I would gladly have an Evo 6 for race duty. For daily driving, I want new, comfortable, quick and modern. A CT9A Evo doesn't satisfy 3 out of the 4 requirements. Is it quick? Of course, nobody debates that. Is it the best car for my needs? Not even close. I'd take an RS, Golf R, S3, CLA45, or STI over a 10 year old used Evo at this point in my life. I'd love to import a LHD Evo 6 TME since they're now legal, but dropping $25,000+ on a used toy isn't in the cards when I also want to buy other, more important things.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:04 AM
  #1881  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by nemsin
4. Suspension geometry. The Evo has years of race proven design behind its suspension setup.
This made me lol, because the RS has no race proven design elements

"The Ford Focus RS WRC appeared in 173 World Rally Championship events, winning 44 and collecting 142 podium places."
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:08 AM
  #1882  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
That's a different car, man.

It's worth noting that the race Evos also often had modified suspension geometry. But don't let that detract from the Evo circle jerk.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:19 AM
  #1883  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by ambystom01
That's a different car, man.

It's worth noting that the race Evos also often had modified suspension geometry. But don't let that detract from the Evo circle jerk.
Pretty much my point. Kind of.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:29 AM
  #1884  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
This made me lol, because the RS has no race proven design elements

"The Ford Focus RS WRC appeared in 173 World Rally Championship events, winning 44 and collecting 142 podium places."
You are mistaken. The suspension that came on the available to the public Evo was raced in many rally events. The suspension that is coming out on the Focus RS, is not the same suspension as was used on the Focus WRC car.

You should read up on wrc homologation, and what changes were, and were not, allowed.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:33 AM
  #1885  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by nemsin
You are mistaken. The suspension that came on the available to the public Evo was raced in many rally events. The suspension that is coming out on the Focus RS, is not the same suspension as was used on the Focus WRC car.

You should read up on wrc homologation, and what changes were, and were not, allowed.
So what, man? That suspension has also largely not changed since the 90s. Do you honestly think suspension technology and design hasn't improved or progressed in 20 years? That a manufacturer building a car in 2015 cannot use the information learned from years past to make a "better" off the shelf product?

By your logic, the 1990 Miata also has race proven suspension that makes it superior to modern cars that haven't had the luxury of 30 years of use.

All of these threads are the same on every forum. All that changes is the car people hold out as a benchmark and then obsessively defend like their ego depends on it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:38 AM
  #1886  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Originally Posted by ambystom01
All of these threads are the same on every forum. All that changes is the car people hold out as a benchmark and then obsessively defend like their ego depends on it.
Then why do you keep coming here if all of these threads are the same?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:40 AM
  #1887  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
This thread. Can we nuke it from outer space, just to be sure?

Can we start 2016 with less asshatery?

Last edited by razorlab; Dec 31, 2015 at 09:45 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:42 AM
  #1888  
migs647's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 62
From: Portland
Originally Posted by razorlab
This thread. Can we nuke it from outer space, just to be sure?

Can we start 2016 with less asshatery?
Where's the :heart: button?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:45 AM
  #1889  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by ambystom01
So what, man? That suspension has also largely not changed since the 90s. Do you honestly think suspension technology and design hasn't improved or progressed in 20 years? That a manufacturer building a car in 2015 cannot use the information learned from years past to make a "better" off the shelf product?
I simply assert that the suspension on the Evo has a race proven heritage and design. It was the result of engineers designing with the intent of winning races.

The suspension on the upcoming Focus RS cannot say that. All you have to do is look to the fact that they are using heavy steel in their suspension arms to see that.

The new Focus RS was not designed to compete in any race organization that I know of. It will not see WRC competition.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 09:49 AM
  #1890  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Heavy steel? Stamped steel components are pretty light. I don't know if you've ever worked on a car with those kinds of parts. It's not like its using huge chunks of cast iron.


You know what else isn't going to see WRC competition? Every single car you own, and every single car I own, and every single car 99.9% of people will ever own.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:41 PM.