Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

track car suggestions / discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 04:14 PM
  #76  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
^not to mention they eat a ton of oil...

btw, how are 4G63's with oil consumption? my 4B11 never burn a drop of oil...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 04:19 PM
  #77  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Are you considering another X, or just an 8/9? I suspect if you get an 8 you will always wish you had gotten a 9. But you can likely find a nice X cheaper than a nice 9.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 04:25 PM
  #78  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by nemsin
Are you considering another X, or just an 8/9? I suspect if you get an 8 you will always wish you had gotten a 9. But you can likely find a nice X cheaper than a nice 9.
naw, just 8/9. X is to heavy. why do you think I'll regret getting an 8 over a 9? isn't the only difference a slighty better turbo and MIVEC on intake and exhaust vs just intake?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 04:27 PM
  #79  
golgo13's Avatar
EvoM Community Team
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (134)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 29
From: @ a track near you
Originally Posted by warmmilk
btw, how are 4G63's with oil consumption?
I've had no issue. I've never ran a catch can and there is no oil in my intake piping. I don't think I have any blowby in the rings either.



Lucky I guess? I think the Japanese engineers got it right.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:08 PM
  #80  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Mine uses some oil, and has some blow by. Its had a hard life though.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:13 PM
  #81  
nemsin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 50
From: PNW
Originally Posted by warmmilk
naw, just 8/9. X is to heavy. why do you think I'll regret getting an 8 over a 9? isn't the only difference a slighty better turbo and MIVEC on intake and exhaust vs just intake?
MIVEC, better turbo, better bov, better cylinder head. It all adds up if you plan on leaving the car at/near stock hp.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...head-tech.html.

Seats and front bumper are also nicer on the 9.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:14 PM
  #82  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by warmmilk
naw, just 8/9. X is to heavy. why do you think I'll regret getting an 8 over a 9? isn't the only difference a slighty better turbo and MIVEC on intake and exhaust vs just intake?

Evo 8 = No Mivec
Evo 9 = Mivec on just intake
Evo 10 = Mivec on both

You'll be able to find a 05 Evo 8 way easier than a 9 for less money. Evo 8 5 spd is also better on track than Evo 9.

As long as you get a 05 Evo 8, you will be good. 05 = larger stock turbo, front LSD and ACD. 05 also has better head castings than 03/04 and some other little differences.

For a track car, Mivec on just intake is whatever, you will be in the higher RPM band where it doesn't really matter anyway.

Last edited by razorlab; Oct 12, 2015 at 05:19 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:39 PM
  #83  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by warmmilk
naw, just 8/9. X is to heavy. why do you think I'll regret getting an 8 over a 9? isn't the only difference a slighty better turbo and MIVEC on intake and exhaust vs just intake?
describe it how much you think really heavier is the track evo X vs IX, and if , how much it really matters for you? ( price wise). Read the CT9A vs CZ4A tread in evo IX vs X. From the last page and back.

Actually be honest, buy the Evo which is cheaper, if they are aprox. are close condition.
If the IX is cheaper get a IX if the X get a X. If the VIII is so much cheaper get the VIII.( if its still at least equal condition vs the others.)

From there you should be pretty equal about build pricing vise . The weight you think is a trade off vs IX, the X actually out shines the CT9A in preatty much any other segments.
Eventually you ending up at the same performance level.
Iwould say dont think it like Evo IX or X., think about it as an EVO. Get a cheaper one or the one has a better condition - shape and has a lower mileage.

I cant speak from drag racing or AutoX point of view so i leave that alone, but like circuit racing - Time Trials - Hill Climbs - rally - RallyX the X is actually better project car.

That is my opinion.

By the way you can buy actually cheap STI 's too , which maybe make sense if you find one for a great price, but the maintenance will be higher, and the car usually not as reliable as the Evo. But i would say the fan is similar and they are fun.

Last edited by Robevo RS; Oct 12, 2015 at 05:44 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:39 PM
  #84  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by razorlab
Evo 8 = No Mivec
Evo 9 = Mivec on just intake
Evo 10 = Mivec on both

You'll be able to find a 05 Evo 8 way easier than a 9 for less money. Evo 8 5 spd is also better on track than Evo 9.

As long as you get a 05 Evo 8, you will be good. 05 = larger stock turbo, front LSD and ACD. 05 also has better head castings than 03/04 and some other little differences.

For a track car, Mivec on just intake is whatever, you will be in the higher RPM band where it doesn't really matter anyway.
Head casting better how? Power or reliability? The lsd and acd so far are the most viable arguments for me
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:40 PM
  #85  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Mine uses some oil, and has some blow by. Its had a hard life though.
How much per oil change?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 05:56 PM
  #86  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by warmmilk
Head casting better how? Power or reliability? The lsd and acd so far are the most viable arguments for me
Better for tuning. Less temperamental.

05 has an arguably better / updated transmission compared to 03/04 as well. Basically 05 is the best of the USDM 8s to get.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 07:23 PM
  #87  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
describe it how much you think really heavier is the track evo X vs IX, and if , how much it really matters for you? ( price wise). Read the CT9A vs CZ4A tread in evo IX vs X. From the last page and back.

Actually be honest, buy the Evo which is cheaper, if they are aprox. are close condition.
If the IX is cheaper get a IX if the X get a X. If the VIII is so much cheaper get the VIII.( if its still at least equal condition vs the others.)

From there you should be pretty equal about build pricing vise . The weight you think is a trade off vs IX, the X actually out shines the CT9A in preatty much any other segments.
Eventually you ending up at the same performance level.
Iwould say dont think it like Evo IX or X., think about it as an EVO. Get a cheaper one or the one has a better condition - shape and has a lower mileage.

I cant speak from drag racing or AutoX point of view so i leave that alone, but like circuit racing - Time Trials - Hill Climbs - rally - RallyX the X is actually better project car.

That is my opinion.

By the way you can buy actually cheap STI 's too , which maybe make sense if you find one for a great price, but the maintenance will be higher, and the car usually not as reliable as the Evo. But i would say the fan is similar and they are fun.
Like I said before, the driving experience is more important to me than lap times. most people agree that the 8/9 is more fun to drive on the track.

the 8/9 is 2-300 lb lighter, which means slower wear on consumables. it can also run 17" wheels, and 17" tires are considerably cheaper than 18's. I also can use the RPF1's I had on my RSX for the 8/9 (17x9 +35) which I'd have to sell and buy 18's for the X. also the X needs a pretty aggressive offset compared to stock to fill out those wheel wells, an offset close to stock doesn't look that good. appearance isn't that big of a deal to me for a track car, but it still counts. and aggressive offsets cause lots of negative feed back through the wheel due to the increased scrub radius. I had 18x9.5 +22 on mine (which is still not all that aggressive for the X) and I hated what it did to steering feel and follow ruts and all that.

flash tuning is also much more developed for the 8/9 than for the X. biggest one for me being map switching without having to flash the ecu as I plan to have a track and street tune. or does the X also have map switching now?

I'm also not the biggest fan of the seating position of the X, steering wheel is too far away, I have to adjust my seating position to get into 5th gear... the 8/9 fits me better...

and I already had an X, so thats worth a little bit. I like trying new cars.

and lastly price. a 9 and X might be comparable, but there are plenty of 8's out there a decent bit cheaper than those and thats really what I'm aiming for.

can you link me to the thread you're talking about?


right now its mostly between an evo 8 and s2k for me. mostly cause I can buy an s2k, keep it for a year, and sell it for the same amount. evo's are pretty good at keeping their value, but they have been dropping slowly, where as s2k's actually went up a bit in the last few years
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 07:31 PM
  #88  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by warmmilk
How much per oil change?
About a quart, nothing major.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 09:34 PM
  #89  
WarmMilk's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 54
From: Federal Way, WA
I need opinions

http://seattle.craigslist.org/est/cto/5250530224.html

http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/cto/5242888021.html

http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/ctd/5265163971.html
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2015 | 09:48 PM
  #90  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by warmmilk

flash tuning is also much more developed for the 8/9 than for the X. biggest one for me being map switching without having to flash the ecu as I plan to have a track and street tune. or does the X also have map switching now?
X has map switching up to 9 maps via cruise control button and true flex fuel is coming VERY soon. I wouldn't let the ECU flash capabilities sway you either way. They are very comparable.

Originally Posted by warmmilk
I have to adjust my seating position to get into 5th gear...
Wait, what? Are you like 3 feet tall?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.