Yeaaahhahah!!!!!!
It has been mentioned in this thread that the total setup will cost 1420 including the Vishnu Approved wideband. Your AEM might work, but the software is not written for it and calibration could be a huge issue.
- Steve
- Steve
*Around 1420.* We have not decided on the final price yet, as we are still waiting to hear back on the final bids for a few things.
Originally Posted by SuperHatch
It has been mentioned in this thread that the total setup will cost 1420 including the Vishnu Approved wideband. Your AEM might work, but the software is not written for it and calibration could be a huge issue.
- Steve
- Steve
Originally Posted by Dustin@Vishnu
*Around 1420.* We have not decided on the final price yet, as we are still waiting to hear back on the final bids for a few things.
I though shiv mentioned in his post, it's about $400. for the setup. So $1420. includes the Xede sounds about right.
Originally Posted by gnulooks
Dustin the $1420 price is for those that don't have the Xede, right?
If the new software can eliminate the o2 CEL from running catless or hi-flow, can we not just completely eliminate the 2nd o2 sensor and run the wideband in that pre-existing bung? It is my understanding that the second o2 sensor serves no purpose other than to tell if the cat is working and give a CEL if it is not...so with this CEL problem eliminated, the 2nd o2 sensor should be of no use. right?
I just dont know if that bung is in a good place for the wideband sensor
I just dont know if that bung is in a good place for the wideband sensor
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
There are other management systems with built-in rear O2 sims, but whether an internal or external sim is used, a wideband can replace the rear O2 without a problem *if* you don't have a cat. Short of that, just spend the $$ to have a bung welded at the back of the downpipe and you can run a wideband whether you have a test pipe or not.
On that note, regarding which wideband(s) can/will be used, why wouldn't it be possible to have a small database of tables for various sensor Volts = AFR (or let end users enter this data for their WB). How different can a Bosch sensor really be whether it's used on an AEM or Innovative controller? A user defineable offset in the software for level matching measured voltage on the signal wire coming in to what the XEDE is reading would be all the calibration it would need then, no? The AEM EMS is setup just like that for the UEGOs.
Let me say that I've used a variety of management on my Evo over the years (SAFC, EMS, UTEC, ECU+) and if the autotune is for real, I may need to add another to the list
On that note, regarding which wideband(s) can/will be used, why wouldn't it be possible to have a small database of tables for various sensor Volts = AFR (or let end users enter this data for their WB). How different can a Bosch sensor really be whether it's used on an AEM or Innovative controller? A user defineable offset in the software for level matching measured voltage on the signal wire coming in to what the XEDE is reading would be all the calibration it would need then, no? The AEM EMS is setup just like that for the UEGOs.
Let me say that I've used a variety of management on my Evo over the years (SAFC, EMS, UTEC, ECU+) and if the autotune is for real, I may need to add another to the list
Originally Posted by BlackEVO
There are other management systems with built-in rear O2 sims, but whether an internal or external sim is used, a wideband can replace the rear O2 without a problem *if* you don't have a cat. Short of that, just spend the $$ to have a bung welded at the back of the downpipe and you can run a wideband whether you have a test pipe or not.
On that note, regarding which wideband(s) can/will be used, why wouldn't it be possible to have a small database of tables for various sensor Volts = AFR (or let end users enter this data for their WB). How different can a Bosch sensor really be whether it's used on an AEM or Innovative controller? A user defineable offset in the software for level matching measured voltage on the signal wire coming in to what the XEDE is reading would be all the calibration it would need then, no? The AEM EMS is setup just like that for the UEGOs.
Let me say that I've used a variety of management on my Evo over the years (SAFC, EMS, UTEC, ECU+) and if the autotune is for real, I may need to add another to the list
On that note, regarding which wideband(s) can/will be used, why wouldn't it be possible to have a small database of tables for various sensor Volts = AFR (or let end users enter this data for their WB). How different can a Bosch sensor really be whether it's used on an AEM or Innovative controller? A user defineable offset in the software for level matching measured voltage on the signal wire coming in to what the XEDE is reading would be all the calibration it would need then, no? The AEM EMS is setup just like that for the UEGOs.
Let me say that I've used a variety of management on my Evo over the years (SAFC, EMS, UTEC, ECU+) and if the autotune is for real, I may need to add another to the list
Originally Posted by asasin79
does this mean anything...i'll buy the LC-1 if i have to, but want to be sure my current setup isn't going to work.
that's why i posted this but nobody answered.
Last edited by asasin79; Jun 9, 2005 at 04:39 PM.