Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Case Study: Road "Tuning" vs Dyno Tuning (Merged)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #601  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Lean and retarded timing = high egts and thermnal stress on pistons

Not at the lower engine speeds we are talking about. Max EGT at this speed will be in the 1300-1400F range-- well below what anyone would consider an over-temp condition. At high engine speeds the situation changes because thermal efficiency of the engine starts to suffer more and more. This is why it is common to counteract that trend with additional fueling. But thanks for trying.
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #602  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Warrtalon

Would you say that to consider something the "best" tune, you look just at how flat the AFR curve is? What if there is more fuel required right at 6k for whatever reason? Wouldn't you want to gradually add fuel as it reaches that point, then gradually remove fuel as you move away from that point? Again, not saying one or the other is the "best" just that pointing to the shape of the AFR curve with a non-standard scale is not the best way to form an argument.
Nope, that's not what I am saying at all. Gradually adding fuel is different than .6 AFR sweeps in and out. You also have timing changes to keep in mind like you said. You stated that you had to add fuel at 6k ish right? That was with your SAFC right? Before you where able to make timing changes correct?

I apologize if it sounds like I am attacking you everytime Warrtalon, I really don't mean to sound like that, I realize I can sound a bit aggressive when I post. I am just glad we are actually talking about tuning now, even if it is just between you and I at this point.

I think you are right about the AFR scaling being tighter on the other chart, but my AFR only fluctuates .2 AFR. Again, is the AFR curve the end-all of tuning? No, there is also timing and boost pressure to address, egt temps, etc. I had some knock in the 6k region and I took care of it with timing control and adding a very small amount of fuel. Notice how my AFR is ramping down very smoothly and ever so slightly towards 6400 rpm? Then ramps back up.
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #603  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Not at the lower engine speeds we are talking about. Max EGT at this speed will be in the 1300-1400F range-- well below what anyone would consider an over-temp condition. At high engine speeds the situation changes because thermal efficiency of the engine starts to suffer more and more. This is why it is common to counteract that trend with additional fueling. But thanks for trying.
With one fast dyno pull you may be correct

But what about in an agresive driving condition doing a full 3rd gear pull and then shifting into 4th comming off a corner for example ?

The work you do speaks for itself in black and white

12.0 / 1 a/f at 23 psi is certainly ONE way to tune - its just a very agressive style for 91 octane and IMHO does not leave any margin of saftey for a bad tank of gas

I choose to tune a bit more on tyhe lower boost side and richer a/f which makes the car virtually impossible to blow up on the stock ecu
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #604  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Sure, that's fine. Again, I am not even saying that this particular tune is any good and have no basis for defending its current shape. I was just trying to bring things back into perspective. It could have been a mail-in flash, it could have been a road tune, it could have been a dyno tune, it could have been any of the above with parts added after the tune. I don't know any of those details, but they would help...
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:02 PM
  #605  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I don't personally tune 23 psi of boost at 12:1 AFR's either on 91 octane nothing good can come of it.

Looking at the graphs Al copied and reposted it is easy to see how one tune would make more power than the other.

Substantially more boost and subrstantially leaner AFR's on the after tune. I would hope it would make more power. I would not run that tune in my personal car, regardless of who was doing the tuning.

Guess we all have different ways of making HP. I think in this case maybe an ego got in the way doing it. I do not feel that tune is safe on 91 octane looking at the boost/AFR's.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:11 PM
  #606  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
The IX I am tuning on pump gas and alochol just made 503 tq and 396 whp - stock turbo. I like the IX's
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #607  
x99percent's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, MI
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
With one fast dyno pull you may be correct

But what about in an agresive driving condition doing a full 3rd gear pull and then shifting into 4th comming off a corner for example ?
What RPM range are we talking about here...?

In the chart, all the AFRs are similar > ~5500rpm.
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #608  
Dyno4mance's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
From: NW Georgia
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Not at the lower engine speeds we are talking about. Max EGT at this speed will be in the 1300-1400F range-- well below what anyone would consider an over-temp condition. At high engine speeds the situation changes because thermal efficiency of the engine starts to suffer more and more. This is why it is common to counteract that trend with additional fueling. But thanks for trying.
Basic stuff really
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #609  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by Dyno4mance
Basic stuff really
I guess not basic enough from the looks of it
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:33 PM
  #610  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
I guess not basic enough from the looks of it

Flatterd of course that a master of tuning like yourself is now using my words in his signature, you honor me

Now will you answer the questions I have posed or will you continue to avoid discussing WHY has the car so detuned from the factory ?

BTW - do you think you are the only person on the planet who can adjust a fuel map lean and retard timing ? There is no "trick" to running a car lean. Going a bit richer does not cost you much power - but it may not get you as many bragging rights with your peak power #'s

I think most professional tuners would agree that 12/1 a/f and 23 psi at peak tq on 91 octane is a bit on the agressive side

I dont even run my race evo that goes on VP import that lean as I am the one who would have to pay to fix any blown motors - why risk popping a head gasket for another 15 whp ?

Last edited by DynoFlash; Jan 12, 2006 at 01:40 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #611  
pretend-evo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: high up in the mountains!!
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
The IX I am tuning on pump gas and alochol just made 503 tq and 396 whp - stock turbo. I like the IX's

what mods does this car have???
stock turbo really?? totally stock or a 20G or WR??
pure alky, or water mix???
what kind of dyno??????
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #612  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by pretend-evo
what mods does this car have???
stock turbo really?? totally stock or a 20G or WR??
pure alky, or water mix???
what kind of dyno??????
2.3L stroker
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=178448
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:43 PM
  #613  
pretend-evo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: high up in the mountains!!
one more question
how much has the evo 9 head been redesigned??
i have heard something about water cooling jackets being moved, but what else?

this may be off topic,, but atleast i'm not starting a flame fest.....
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #614  
sneakychaos's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
<e>

Last edited by sneakychaos; Jan 12, 2006 at 04:00 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #615  
pretend-evo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: high up in the mountains!!
Never before have I witnessed such poor grammar among a group of adults..
The worst part, I do it too.
crap.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:00 AM.