Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

STI vs EVO IX

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #46  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
Evo 9s make 295 whp with full exhaust and flash on 91. In the post by boomn it said a tuned 9 only makes 275 whp. Shiv may have made a mistake when he typed that.
I think he's tuned some to about 275whp recently; therefore, expect anywhere from 275 - 295whp on 91 octane
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #47  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by boomn29
I think what he said is correct. There's different dyno's and all that. He quoted numbers he sees on his dyno.

What I'm curious about is whether either have a bigger gain going from 91 to 93 octane? I would assume no, but curious since I live in the land of 93 and that's what my next car will be tuned for...
Yes u will see 290+ on 93 oct on a Shiv like Dyno. That is 330ish on a Dynojet. I could see u getting 340s on a DJ with 93oct.
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #48  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by IE Evo
Yes u will see 290+ on 93 oct on a Shiv like Dyno. That is 330ish on a Dynojet. I could see u getting 340s on a DJ with 93oct.
I hoping for 330whp on TT's Dynojet in April
Old Jan 13, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #49  
-adrenaline-'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
to add, I love sti's, they are great cars, but as everyone said, they are more for those who mod their cars lightly. They are reliable and good for those sticking close to warranty.

It also comes down to your taste. For example, I was looking into buying either an Evo or an STi (surprise surprise)...so I posted in both forums go both sides of advice, blah blah blah, talked to friends, some said they loved the boxer rumble, some said the Evo looked better, so all in all, i was pretty confused, even after many people explained to me their opinion.

so I went to test drive them. First was the STi. Dang, the first time I got in, I felt the car was bigger than I thought...sort of felt like a muscle car, with the hood scoop staring at me in the hood. If the car wouldve felt smaller or more compacted, like the Evo, the scoop wouldve serve another meaning, but I just felt i was in a heavy car...one of those mustangs. The nice boxer rumble helped reenforced this image as the hood scoop shook as the speeds increased. Needless to say, a once feature I liked about the STi, soon turned into annoyance when I felt it was sort of in my way. The wing was annoying to (same was the Evo's...a bit more since its thicker.), so all this didnt helped at that precised moment.

when I got in the Evo, i immediately noticed the seats hug tighter and the steering wheel was nicer. Car felt like I expected and liked it better.

The STI overall, felt like a muscle car. Why?

Hood scoop (that shook around...felt i was driving a freakin ford), big interior (feeling wise, probably smaller than the Evo's since I know for a fact the Evo has more leg room behind), a more linear power band (felt like the car was supercharged, rather than turbocharged), and boxer rumble (sort of like V8ish). Car just seems to get louder rather than faster as the RPMs go up.

After taking some curves, the Sti finally felt more musclelish as I remembered it had more body roll.

So yeah, i ended up liking the Evo better. Its just a matter of personal taste. Im sure many STi owners/enthusiasts love the features I just described as dislikes.

Last edited by -adrenaline-; Jan 13, 2008 at 10:41 PM.
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #50  
brodienuchies's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: N why C
Get an EVO IX with a Tuning Technologies Stage 1 or 2!
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #51  
Peteypab2133's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
From: Locally
STI is more relaible stock for stock.

After slight mods, i have alot of friends complaining about the STI having issues being modded.

My evo IX with only TBE, MBC TUNE ran a 12.1 @117 mph. soo... The STI turbo had its fastest time ever of like a low low 12... i have seen stock turbo evo's knock low 11's high 10's. (not reality though)
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #52  
mrdevo9mr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Danbury, CT
Get the IX

Get the IX. I have both an 05 sti and an 06 IX and the IX is the more fun car. The sti is fun, but the evo makes you feel like you are driving a race car. Every time I drive the sti I think it's a really nice car, then I get in my IX and end up saying what a great car! Fun, fun and then more fun!
Old Jan 14, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #53  
EVOlution561's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 853
Likes: 3
From: South Florida
The EVO IX is just a beast once you start modding but so is the 07 STi, however the EVO is a little bit cheaper to make it go fast.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #54  
mofoSTI's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: springtuckey, OR
STI makes more low end torque and mid range power and is a better daily driver. Better clutch, tranny and t-case. The evo makes way more top end power and the IX's have improved midrange power, but is more of a race car on the street especially the RS that hos roll up windows and no sound insulation to make it the lightes of the evos. They also have more clutch and tranny and t-case issues. I like the STI for a daily driver partially because of the tighter turning radious. The evo you gotta rev the crap out of it to really haul *** and its harder to make that U turn in the street unless you use the E brake.
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 01:27 AM
  #55  
EvoG8r's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Stavanger
The STI has a better manual in my opinion, but its short gearing makes it hard to get good 1/4 mile times.

STIs are harder to work on in my opinion. Try changing spark plugs, jeeze what a PITA. There is just crap all over the engine too. I like the simplicity of the Evo.

However, if you are going to just do a stage II STI and stop, that is a better daily driver and has better crash ratings which if you have seen some of the nasty accidents people get into in both cars, you'll see why this can be an important factor.

I have owned an 04 STI, 03 Evo VIII and Evo IX at the same time.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #56  
stuntman's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
EVOs are more fun on a roadcourse than STI imo. They turn-in better, are more neutral, and have better chassis dynamics than the STI.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3000ways
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
36
Nov 8, 2012 08:24 PM
Rotary Madman.
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
22
Jun 19, 2012 11:04 AM
jz3513
Evo General
39
Mar 31, 2011 03:34 AM
cookiedo!
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
54
Feb 5, 2010 10:27 AM
scoob4fun
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
85
Jul 5, 2006 08:48 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 PM.